98 reds in my cellar

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
Pete

98 reds in my cellar

Post by Pete »

I have alot of 98 reds in my cellar and need some advice.
Which ones should be drunk when?

They are:
Wynns riddock cab sav 98
Wynns michael shiraz 98
Wynns cab sav 98
St Hugo cab sav 98
Richmond Grove Limited Release shiraz 98
Jacobs Creek Limited Release cab Sav 98

Hacker
Posts: 1358
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 7:07 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Hacker »

Pete,

depends on how cool your cellar is and how many of each you have. I would suggest the Richmond Grove Shiraz is ready now....I presume this is the Barossa one. The Jacobs Creek should be ready now or very soon, followed by the St Hugo and the Wynns Black Label, although these two would see out another 10 years. The John Riddoch and Michael would be nowhere ready, and I wouldn't touch them for 5-8 years till they settle down.

However.......

If you have a dozen of each, it is good to try each of them now to monitor their evolution, and to see how they suit your own palate. Just because someone says to cellar for x years, doesn't mean they are not right for your own tastes now.

cheers,

David M.

User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Post by Red Bigot »

Pete,

I agree with David. The Jacobs Ck Ltd Release cabernet 98 is drinking well now, it's not in the same longevity class as the $50 JC Limited Releases, hence around $20 price, so probably drink over the next 2-3 years.
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)

707
Posts: 1173
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 1:24 pm
Location: Adelaide, centre of the wine universe

Post by 707 »

I think the 98 Wynns Cabernet (BL) might come to hand sooner than this label usually does, it seemed to lighten off from 98.

I'd leave the John Riddoch and Michael longer term.

Richmond Grove and Jacobs Creek should be ready.
Cheers - Steve
If you can see through it, it's not worth drinking!

GraemeG
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:53 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by GraemeG »

It's like the British Open golf - a knowledgeable crowd!

Jacob's Creek - definitely drink now. Probably Richmond as well. Wait for the Wynns. Not tasted St H.

cheers,
Graeme

Mike Hawkins
Posts: 2747
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am

Post by Mike Hawkins »

I vaguely recall the label on the JCLRCS indicated it would cellar for up to 20- 25 years. There is no way that wine will be in great nick in 2023.

I had a bottle last year and suggest drink now - 2009.

Cheers

Mike

FatBoy
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Kensington, Melbourne

Re: 98 reds in my cellar

Post by FatBoy »

Pete wrote:Wynns riddock cab sav 98

About 2030

'82 I had last week is still youthful at 23 years of age. Wish I'd waited now.

Guest

Post by Guest »

My brother has a 96 Wynns Cab and a 98 Wynns Cab when should these be drunk?

707
Posts: 1173
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 1:24 pm
Location: Adelaide, centre of the wine universe

Post by 707 »

Fatboy, the 98 JR ain't no 82 JR which is a stunningly great wine by any standard. Longevity will be a bit less IMO.

Guest, depends how your brothers bottles have been stored. If they are just kept in a house without proper cellaring conditions, I'd suggest they are both ready. If they have been in a cool cellar then another couple of years won't hurt.

"It's like the British Open golf - a knowledgeable crowd" I like that one Graeme, as well as the sentiment intended!
Cheers - Steve
If you can see through it, it's not worth drinking!

Guest

Post by Guest »

707 They have been in his wine fridge at 15 Celcius since near release.

TORB
Posts: 2493
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: Bowral NSW
Contact:

Post by TORB »

Mike Hawkins wrote:I vaguely recall the label on the JCLRCS indicated it would cellar for up to 20- 25 years. There is no way that wine will be in great nick in 2023.
Mike


My origional TN said "up to 15 years" and there is no doubt it has developed a bit faster than I expected by 10 years for a $23 wine isn't bad.
Cheers
Ric
TORBWine

707
Posts: 1173
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 1:24 pm
Location: Adelaide, centre of the wine universe

Post by 707 »

In a wine fridge there's no rush. They'll both drink at their peak around the same time, probably another two years would be ideal. Maybe try both at the same time?
Cheers - Steve
If you can see through it, it's not worth drinking!

Bobsi

Post by Bobsi »

Will deffinatly try them both together 707. Should be an interesting Comparison for two of the same wine both from good vintages and both stored next to each other.

Interestingly last night we cracked a 96 yellow Label Wolf Blass Cab/Shiraz thats been in his fridge since release and i had been pressuring him to open this for the last 12 months as i thought it would be past its best given a} Its only a yellow b}Appart from Platinums and some Blacks Wolf Blass wines are usually medium term wines for the cellar at best. I must say it has probly been in its peek for a while but it was deffenatlly still there last night and we beleive that it probly had another 12 months there. I guess it shows that storing correctly at a temperature on the lower end of the scale will prolong a wines life. He has a 97 yellow which will be interesting to see if thats held up given the vintage. Also a 96 Grey Label Cab/Shiraz which on paper should long outlive the little brother yellow.

Post Reply