Cork Count Competition 2009 - The winner is...

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
pcjm
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 5:34 pm

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by pcjm »

566 please
Top
jester
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 1:57 am
Location: Hobart

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by jester »

I recon 477
Top
bigmac
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:58 pm

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by bigmac »

An even 550 for me.
Top
PaulG
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:50 am
Location: Adelaide
Contact:
Contact PaulG

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by PaulG »

I'll put in for 563!
Top
User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:
Contact Red Bigot

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Red Bigot »

Loztralia wrote:There seems to be a lot of entering based on last year's result. In 2010 would you consider filling the jar with screwcaps? :wink:

Hmm, not quite ready for that, still have a lot of wine, especially pre-2003 which is mostly under cork.
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)
Top
User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:
Contact Red Bigot

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Red Bigot »

mf wrote:532 (would have said more but I can see some wasted space)

That's just a quirk of the photo I think, I could only cram 1-2 more corks in there and it's been shaken down a couple of times too.

BTW I don't know the answer, I haven't actually counted them yet, but will do this weekend.
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)
Top
User avatar
rednut
Posts: 302
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:07 pm
Location: South Aust.

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by rednut »

396 :D
"A woman drove me to drink, and I'll be a son of a gun but I never even wrote to thank her" WC Fields
Top
Loztralia
Posts: 334
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:47 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Loztralia »

I'm going to say 525.
3, 65, 7, 50
Top
User avatar
Maximus
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Central Otago
Contact:
Contact Maximus

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Maximus »

476
Max
-----
Avant d’être bon, un vin doit être vrai
Top
Brucer
Posts: 597
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 12:48 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Brucer »

541

Will the next question be.........

"How many have TCA?"
When not drinking a fine red, I'm a cardboard claret man!
Top
User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:
Contact Red Bigot

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Red Bigot »

Brucer wrote:541

Will the next question be.........

"How many have TCA?"


Good question, already thought of that, but the answer is zero. I don't put the tainted corks in there, they either go back with the bottle to claim a replacement or go in the bin.
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)
Top
User avatar
Tim Smith
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Barossa Valley South Australia
Contact:
Contact Tim Smith

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Tim Smith »

553, based on my scientific average of the first ten guesses, rounded down.....
Top
mf
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 12:52 am

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by mf »

Red Bigot wrote:
mf wrote:532 (would have said more but I can see some wasted space)

That's just a quirk of the photo I think, I could only cram 1-2 more corks in there and it's been shaken down a couple of times too.

BTW I don't know the answer, I haven't actually counted them yet, but will do this weekend.


I was only joking - trying to pretend I was taking a scientific approach. I am sure you did your best :D - although after what you have said I will also be claiming victory for 530 and 531 and in any other case I will blaming my loss on optical illusion.

This makes me think to fill this jar (as someone with not much old wine) that I would take about 10 years to fill this jar.
Top
seddo
Posts: 281
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 4:42 pm

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by seddo »

552
Top
User avatar
n4sir
Posts: 4020
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 10:53 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by n4sir »

533.
Forget about goodness and mercy, they're gone.
Top
Mike Hawkins
Posts: 2747
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Mike Hawkins »

519
Top
User avatar
Alan Foo
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 11:34 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Alan Foo »

I will say 318
Top
User avatar
TiggerK
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:29 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by TiggerK »

Put me down for 539.
Top
burgster
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:15 am

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by burgster »

Where do you get them all from. Do they still use corks in Australia?
Top
User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:
Contact Red Bigot

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Red Bigot »

burgster wrote:Where do you get them all from. Do they still use corks in Australia?

:lol:
Unfortunately yes, but many of them would be from wines pre 2003 vintage rather than new buys, although I still do buy some new-release wines sealed with cork where the wine is desirable enough. My cellar has enough wines sealed with cork to continue the competition for a few years yet, but I'll have to find another container for next time.
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)
Top
Matt
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:54 pm
Location: Perth

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Matt »

334 :)
Top
Blue
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 7:38 pm

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Blue »

540!!
Top
monghead
Posts: 1769
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 10:28 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by monghead »

544
Top
quip
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 3:21 pm

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by quip »

573
Top
User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:
Contact Red Bigot

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Red Bigot »

I've got some bad news for some of you who may not have checked the prior year post or read bacchaebabe's early post.
Last year the answer was 527.
Last year there were sparkling corks in the mix.
Sparkling corks on average take up slightly more space than regular corks.
There are no sparkling corks this year.
It stands to reason that any calculation/guess under 527 has little chance of being correct.
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)
Top
SueNZ
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 6:22 am
Location: Auckland, NZ
Contact:
Contact SueNZ

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by SueNZ »

555

Cheers,
Sue
Top
Eddy B
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:26 am
Location: Canberra

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by Eddy B »

I guess 496
Top
User avatar
GRB
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by GRB »

It's obvious, 534 the rest of you are wrong so you can give up now :twisted:

GB
Winner of the inaugural RB cork-count competition
Runner up RB-NTDIR competition
Runner up TORB TN competition
Leave of absence second RB c-c competition
Top
richard
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:55 pm

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by richard »

I think that 548 could be the number
Top
A_n_d_r_e_w
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 10:10 pm

Re: Cork Count Competition 2009

Post by A_n_d_r_e_w »

588
Top
Post Reply

Return to “All About Wine”