What's the story with Chateau Lafite Rothschild?

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
User avatar
bigkid
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:06 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

What's the story with Chateau Lafite Rothschild?

Post by bigkid »

Hi all,

Tried a bottle of this in the eighties and recall it being right up there with the best we'd had at the time. Can't remember the vintage. I was having a look at Langtons today and noted the 1996 go for between $240-300 at auction, but the 2003 goes for btn $800-1000. WineSearcher notes a bottle for around $800 as does cellartracker.com.

Parker notes 1996 as an extraordinary year in Pauillac and 2003 as a lesser vintage but outstanding nonetheless. The 1996 seems to rate around same scores as the 2003 in the reviews I have seen. Why is the 1996 Lafite selling so reasonably at auction compared to the 2003?

Regards,

Allan

Baby Chickpea
Posts: 582
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 12:17 pm

Post by Baby Chickpea »

Allan, don't know where you got $240-300 for 96 Lafite coz last price paid in 2007 was $900 at Langtons irrespective of what range is.

2003 Lafite is a 100pointer hence the price I suspect.

Bottom line is the 03 is currently cheaper ($783 last price for 03 lafite in 2007).
Danny

The voyage of discovery lies not in finding new landscapes but in having new eyes. We must never be afraid to go too far, for success lies just beyond - Marcel Proust

camw
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by camw »

Looks like you misread 1966 as 1996 Allan ...

User avatar
Craig(NZ)
Posts: 3246
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Craig(NZ) »

2003 Lafite is the best of the 4 2003 Firsts ive tried (havent tried the Latour). However I struggled a bit with the 2003's. They arent as good as the 2000s thats for sure and the prices being asked of them maybe make them one of the worst bang for buck vintages ever?

The only 03 I bought was langoa barton, and I dont regret not buying anything else.

1996 a much better prospect. They seem to be getting better and better write ups and prices compared to some of the noughties vintages appear saintly. I remember the revolt against the 95/96 prices, but now they seem pretty good even!!
Follow me on Vivino for tasting notes Craig Thomson

User avatar
bigkid
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:06 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by bigkid »

camw wrote:Looks like you misread 1966 as 1996 Allan ...


Doh! Well that leaves me a little red faced - Any chance you could delete this thread Gavin to save me any further embarrassment? Thanks camw. Apologies for wasting time. Regards, Allan

Mike Hawkins
Posts: 2747
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am

Post by Mike Hawkins »

Craig,

I cant agree with you, especially for Pauillac & St Julien 03s. Now that they're starting to settle down, I think many will turn out better than their siblings from 2000 (and they currently sell for much less here). Try the 03 Latour if you get a chance, its mind blowingly good. OTOH, the 03's from Pomerol are not a patch on their 00 counterparts.

Mike

User avatar
bigkid
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:06 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by bigkid »

so......what would a '66 be like...assuming proper cellaring. Still have plenty of life left in it?

a

Post Reply