griff wrote:plummy wrote:One of the most important things for longevity is balance, a balance between the fruit and the acid. Too much of one doesn't make for long life. Likewise with too little.
With red wines you can add the amount of tannin to the equation. Too much tannin always gives you a hard taste in aged reds, too little and it doesn't last the distance!
I've had a lot of trouble finding a riesling good enough to cellar for the long term. I particularly like aged rieslings. I've bought quite a number and still haven't found one.
Hope the above helps.
Kim
Hi Kim,
Which rieslings have you tried that have failed to last the distance for you and also which aged rieslings have you liked?
I should mention that I actually find this variety one of the easiest to cellar to be honest. Especially if one just looks at white varieties. Its chardonnay that I find hard.
cheers
Carl
Hi Kim
Acid vs fruit is certainly a big part of the equation for riesling. Alcohol is another (related) one, and those that are too high in alcohol don't have longevity. If anything, a touch of 'steeliness' and shyness when young might bode well for a glorious cellaring future....
Having said that, I have a reasonable amount of riesling in the cellar that I have confidence will cellar well (10+ years in some cases), and I've had a couple of stellar rieslings twice that age. Without listing labels, pick your location (Eden Valley, Clare Valley, Great Southern), try a couple and see if you find pristine fruit and balanced acid - maybe the Petaluma Hanlin Hill is a good starting point. PM if you want a list of my personal favourites.
Carl,
Have to agree with you on Chardonnay - of the white varieties, this is the one I would love to cellar more of, and spend the most money on, but don't go much beyond 5 years generally. I've been disappointed more often than not, at some expense. I have 30 or so in the cellar (including some big guns), but don't go back past 2004.
Cheers
Allan
Wine, women and song. Ideally, you can experience all three at once.