dingozegan wrote:I'm not a fan of Kiwi Sauv Blanc, but I think most international Sauv Blanc lovers consider NZ has the edge over Australia when it comes to Sauv Blanc. If the article's drinking statistic is true, clearly the average drinker thinks so too, which suggests the Aussie industry needs to either improve the Sauv Blanc/crisp white wine quality (or offer an attractive alternative), or improve the marketing (more likely), or both. Protectionism is (ultimately) not in the best interests of the Aussie wine industry IMO.
Protectionism is not in the best interests of Australian wine makers, no. The Aussie wine industry should say "we now have a market of new wine drinkers into this style of thing - lets show them what wine really is". I do not like any Sauv Blanc's, but my wife does. Whenever she buys one, I will open a Hunter Sem or a riesling. Problem is, "Savvy's" are so accesible and are usually about as subtle as a brick to the face, requiring no wine appreciation knowledge to enjoy. I think this is their appeal. (My wife also loves Riesling and a number of other whites - she does have great taste, but this is her one flaw

)
There is definitely a divide in quality/price trade-offs though, because you can spend 10 bucks and get an NZ sauv blanc that tastes like.... an NZ sauc blanc. 10 bucks on an Aussie riesling or sem will get you a generic, unbalanced, unloving and unrewarding drop 7 times out of 10. The reverse is also true, however - spend 25 on an NZ sauv blanc and you get, again, an NZ sauv blanc. Spend 25 on a riesling, you can buy a Petaluma Hanlin Hill, a Clonakilla etc etc. Spend 25 on a semillon, you can get a Thomas Braemore, a Tyrrell's HVD/Belford/Stevens. I think my point is the accesibility and quality rises substantially with price in Aus with white varietals. I have had my share of NZ sauv blancs (no more!) and find the difference is greater balance, intensity of fruit flavours, ageability blah blah - it is that you can taste less cat pee.