Craig(NZ) wrote:Go da all whites!
3 Points for NZ, Nothing much changes, always 1 behind Australia
Craig(NZ) wrote:Go da all whites!
3 Points for NZ, Nothing much changes, always 1 behind Australia
ChrisV wrote:Not sure this is true but I heard one of your players had to ask for time off his job as a bank teller so he could go be part of the World Cup squad? Hilarious if true.
rens wrote:Well, You'd never guess I like the world game... (look right)
Being a dutch born Australian, I have 2 teams in the mix. Australia to go down to England in the round of 16 and the dutch to win the whole bloody thing...
Green Gold and Oranje!
Michael McNally wrote:Wonder why you tipped the oranje Rens? Bias?
I agree that Brasil lost the match rather than the Dutch winning it, and I am sick or Arjen Robben throwing himself on the floor all the time. That said, the Dutch are capable of much better and the hallmark of a winning side is one that wins even when playing poorly.
Cheers
Michael
Michael R wrote:It amazing how much better tournaments become in the knock out stages, its all to play for and go for broke underdogs tend to force conservative teams into playing proper football. Group stages are so often dominated by tense teams using negative strategies.
So far the Germans counter attacking has been a joy to watch, the speed at which they run at stretched defences is awesome. I cannot wait to see the battle between them and Spain, who will surely be a lot better prepared than the clueless Argies (although what do you expect with ole Diego at the helm). Uruguay have justified many peoples ‘dark horse’ pick, and I’m delighted for them but feel terribly for Ghana. It’s one of the toughest misses I’ve had to watch in quite some time.
Holland, well I leave it to our Dutch forumites to better outline they’re chances, they look solid but honestly I’ll be surprised if they win it, even now as heavy favourites to qualify for the final. The Dutch keeper looks awesome however and that is a massive plus, (just ask English/Brazil fans). However recently any gifted Dutch team would have had a civil war by now, and gone out on penalties, so the fact they seem happy (van persie aside) and haven’t faced penalties yet makes me think I should back them.
Yet again the greatest show on earth has been slighted by appalling un-sportsmanlike conduct. I look forward to the day when FIFA introduces retrospective (referee) decisions. Its one thing to get it wrong during the heat of play, but failure to correct the error afterwards is irresponsible. Anyone who watched Brazil play Ivory Coast will no doubt have been sickened by what transpired. Unfortunately while players who ‘game’ the system go unpunished, what else can we expect. Luckily though the best teams (IMO) have qualified regardless. David Villa is surely player of the tournament, with Schweinsteiger and Mueller close behind. New Zealand has been the good story, Vuvuzelas being the bad, France being the ugly.
Cant believe it’ll be another 4 years until Brazil. Fingers crossed Australia gets to host soon. Despite its failings, its the true global contest.
orpheus wrote:Michael R wrote:It amazing how much better tournaments become in the knock out stages, its all to play for and go for broke underdogs tend to force conservative teams into playing proper football. Group stages are so often dominated by tense teams using negative strategies.
So far the Germans counter attacking has been a joy to watch, the speed at which they run at stretched defences is awesome. I cannot wait to see the battle between them and Spain, who will surely be a lot better prepared than the clueless Argies (although what do you expect with ole Diego at the helm). Uruguay have justified many peoples ‘dark horse’ pick, and I’m delighted for them but feel terribly for Ghana. It’s one of the toughest misses I’ve had to watch in quite some time.
Holland, well I leave it to our Dutch forumites to better outline they’re chances, they look solid but honestly I’ll be surprised if they win it, even now as heavy favourites to qualify for the final. The Dutch keeper looks awesome however and that is a massive plus, (just ask English/Brazil fans). However recently any gifted Dutch team would have had a civil war by now, and gone out on penalties, so the fact they seem happy (van persie aside) and haven’t faced penalties yet makes me think I should back them.
Yet again the greatest show on earth has been slighted by appalling un-sportsmanlike conduct. I look forward to the day when FIFA introduces retrospective (referee) decisions. Its one thing to get it wrong during the heat of play, but failure to correct the error afterwards is irresponsible. Anyone who watched Brazil play Ivory Coast will no doubt have been sickened by what transpired. Unfortunately while players who ‘game’ the system go unpunished, what else can we expect. Luckily though the best teams (IMO) have qualified regardless. David Villa is surely player of the tournament, with Schweinsteiger and Mueller close behind. New Zealand has been the good story, Vuvuzelas being the bad, France being the ugly.
Cant believe it’ll be another 4 years until Brazil. Fingers crossed Australia gets to host soon. Despite its failings, its the true global contest.
I agree completely that German's speed on the counter-attack is marvellous to watch. The Germans deserve to win the Cup, based on what I've seen. They have demolished Australia, ARgentina, England.
Reinforces the fact that the game that cost us the second round was the draw against Ghana.
Don't underestimate the Netherlands though, they are a very tight unit, and they are a chance. I would certainly pick them to make the final.
Germany's only concern must be the absence of Mueller in the semi-final. I hope they make it to the final, not because I have any particular allegiance to Germany, but because they are the most enjoyable team to watch, as far as I'm concerned.
BTW, silly article by Michael Cockerill attacking Australia's choices of foreign coaches rather than Australian. I say by all means encourage Australian coaches, give them assistant's roles, put them on mentoring programmes, whatever will improve their skills, but from what I've seen, we will get better results chosing whoever is the best coach, rather than whoever is the best Australian coach.
His argument; "No country has ever won with a foreign coach coaching their national side."
Does he think we will win with an Australian coaching our side? That fact is more a reflection of the fact that countries that win the World Cup have incredible depth of talent to draw on in their own country both as players and coaches, and don't need to look outside their own country.