Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
platinum
Posts: 301
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:09 am

Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by platinum »

Interesting read in the latest mailer. I wont type the whole page out (cant be bothered) but will quote a few points they make.

As we speak theres evidence accumulating the the quality of natural cork is on the rise, Mind you the French keep the best corks for themselves.

We have no intention of moving back to natural cork at this stage but for the long term health of the enviroment it would be the best option.

Give me a cork oak forest over an alluminium smelter anyday.

Next time you are enjoying a wine under SC ponder alluminium and its toxicity to brain cells, the enviromental cost of the smelting process, the air and ground pollution associated with smelting (flurosis in particular) and the large amounts of energy (electricity) required to produce aluminium. If thats not enough consider the copper that is added to wines under SC to keep sulphides at bay. This ludicrous situation is a direct result of the SC suffocating the wine. The appropriately named SC screws the biochemistry of the bottle. We should also be interested in the amount of copper we are ingesting. Managing the overuse of copper in the vineyard is bad enough (key component of some fungicides) but adding it directly to wine is anothermatter all together- bon apetite. Strangely enough the biodynamic lobby has generously overlooked the toxicity of both copper and sulphur, deeming them 'natural; control agentsfor fungal disease. Why is it that substances that occur naturally are considered not only safe but good for us? Uranium,1080,alkaloids, lead, death cap mushrooms, hemlock, deadly nightshade and taipan venom all occurr naturallyso by this misguided logic these must be good for us. Whos first to dig in?

User avatar
griff
Posts: 1906
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by griff »

Don't forget how bad the bottle contents are. Alcohol consumption isn't exactly a panacea much as we would like to think ;)

cheers

Carl
Bartenders are supposed to have people skills. Or was it people are supposed to have bartending skills?

User avatar
Craig(NZ)
Posts: 3246
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Craig(NZ) »

...and the air I breathe is killing me too through the awful process of oxidisation. The air I breathe is killing me too through the awful process of oxidisation. :mrgreen:
Follow me on Vivino for tasting notes Craig Thomson

User avatar
Michael McNally
Posts: 2084
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Michael McNally »

Some interesting points.

However....

We don't make cork here so transportation is a pollution factor.
Cork grown organically would be great, but is it? (I honestly don't know but would imagine there are some chemicals used in growing cork trees).
There is a fairly small amount of aluminium in a screwcap - the energy production value of each cap would be quite small I imagine. Less than the embedded energy of the transpoart costs?
What are the energy costs of harvesting cork?
Sulphur is used as a preservative in other foods/drinks such as processed meats (mortadella/ salami etc) and as a cleaning agent for winey equipment.
Many things that are 'toxic' in large amounts are fine in small amounts (that's what livers and kidneys are for). Tomatoes have naturally occuring monosodium glutamate - should we ban them?
Aluminium does not contain TCA!!!!!!!!!!!


That said, I love a good rant!!!

Thanks for sharing

Michael

PS I doubt the French "keep the best corks for themselves" - money talks. The best corks would be going to the highest bidder
Bonum Vinum Laetificat Cor Hominis

User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 369
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Roscoe »

We need copper in our diets. The upper limits legislated in Australian wines are many orders of magnitude less than what is considered toxic. There are a small number of people who have a problem with copper metabolism who may need to watch this, but most of us would develop toxic levels of alcohol well before our copper intake became a problem from wine (as Carl mentions).
There is no evidence that I know of that aluminium levels in wine are anywhere near toxic levels or indeed that they are higher in stelvin bottles. Anyone else?
Stelvins don't "suffocate wine", they just work as well as the best corks in restricting air ingress.
Copper is "natural" in that we need it as a nutrient. But I always think when people use the word "natural" that they are trying to sell me something. I cringe when I heard it used. It could be the most abused word in the English language.
"It is very hard to make predictions, especially about the future." Samuel Goldwyn

User avatar
rens
Posts: 1425
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by rens »

Roscoe wrote:We need copper in our diets. The upper limits legislated in Australian wines are many orders of magnitude less than what is considered toxic. There are a small number of people who have a problem with copper metabolism who may need to watch this, but most of us would develop toxic levels of alcohol well before our copper intake became a problem from wine (as Carl mentions).
There is no evidence that I know of that aluminium levels in wine are anywhere near toxic levels or indeed that they are higher in stelvin bottles. Anyone else?
Stelvins don't "suffocate wine", they just work as well as the best corks in restricting air ingress.
Copper is "natural" in that we need it as a nutrient. But I always think when people use the word "natural" that they are trying to sell me something. I cringe when I heard it used. It could be the most abused word in the English language.

Combine it with the phrase '99% fat free' and I think of doing something violent to the person uttering the words :evil:
never underestimate the predictability of stupidity

User avatar
kirragc
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: central victoria

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by kirragc »

In a way the environmental argument against aluminium based seal isnt too bad. Bauxite is strip mined in the north od australia under favourable goverment conditions. Transported to plant 1000s of Ks away (Weipa to Portland) where it is refined with energy provided from the Latrobe Valley coal fired plants of which they pay bugger all for compared to the rest of us. Then that plant is cooled by water from the Thompson dam which is theoretically there for the drinking water of the greater melbourne area. When you realise that Alcoa Portland consumes something in the vicinity of a third of Vics electricity output then it does seem Kinda ridiculous to manufacture closures at such a huge cost when trees will grow them at a far cheaper rate rate using a far greener energy consumption method.

Ima let you finish.......... just saying............


edit spellling godammit
Futue te ipsum

User avatar
Adair
Posts: 1534
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 9:01 am
Location: North Sydney
Contact:

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Adair »

Roscoe wrote:There is no evidence that I know of that aluminium levels in wine are anywhere near toxic levels or indeed that they are higher in stelvin bottles. Anyone else?
Stelvins don't "suffocate wine", they just work as well as the best corks in restricting air ingress.
Hi Roscoe,

Based on my discussion with winemakers, there are, in general, higher levels of copper (I think you mean this as opposed to alumimium) in SC wines rather than cork or DIAM sealed wines, due to no air being allowed out of the wine at the time and just after bottling. From memory (not 100% certain), if I winemakerthinks that a wine has a chance of becoming reductive in the bottle, they would put more copper in the wine if the wine is under SC.

Happy to be corrected on the technicality and detail, but I think the general comment is correct. However, winemakers seems to have learnt much over the past decade of SC use to not require as much copper than in the early 2000s.

Kind regards,
Adair
Wine is bottled poetry.

Nayan
Posts: 504
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 9:59 pm
Location: Kazakhstan

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Nayan »

Michael McNally wrote:Some interesting points.

However....

We don't make cork here...

Actually, you do...

DaveB
Posts: 442
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 11:38 am
Location: The Greenock Hotel Lunch Club
Contact:

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by DaveB »

Adair wrote:
Roscoe wrote:Happy to be corrected on the technicality and detail, but I think the general comment is correct. However, winemakers seems to have learnt much over the past decade of SC use to not require as much copper than in the early 2000s.

Kind regards,
Adair


Hi Adair,

The study that I've seen from the AWRI showed that the numbers of wines submitted for PFC (blue fining) trials was very low in the early '00's, peaked around '05/'06 and was still fairly high in '07/'08 when the paper was published.

Not sure if there has been a further study after that paper though....I presume so.

There is some stuff on it on the following link or more in depth stuff if you trawl the AWRI website.

http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=get ... taId=58431

User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 369
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Roscoe »

Hi Adair and Dave
The copper levels found by the AWRI are still quite low. The highest average is 0.49mg/l. The upper level of intake advised (by the nhmrc) is 10mg/day - this probably includes a fair margin of safety. Assuming an average intake from other sources of 3 mg/day, it would take 14 litres of wine to lift you into the potentially toxic territory. I think toxicity from ethanol is a much bigger problem than copper at these concentrations.
My comments about the aluminium were not an error. I don't know of any measurements of aluminium levels in wine. IMHO aluminium from cans or cookware is likely to be a much bigger issue but public health experts don't seem to concerned with them.
Cheers
"It is very hard to make predictions, especially about the future." Samuel Goldwyn

DaveB
Posts: 442
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 11:38 am
Location: The Greenock Hotel Lunch Club
Contact:

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by DaveB »

Hi Roscoe,

True...regardless the wines in our country are manipulated enough IMHO...if wineries had to put what actually goes into the wine of the label nobody would buy the stuff and the increase in blue fining is a concern as I'm sure not many people would be too happy having potassium ferrocyanide in contact with their evening tipple.

Aluminium isn't so nice for the environment, I think there can be no doubt on that, the verdict is still out on how it reacts over time with the acids and alcohol in wine...I'd certainly prefer a CONSISTENT cork closure, they may well be getting better but it's probably a bit late isn't it :)

Cheers

Dave

User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 369
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Roscoe »

My understanding is that the wine is not actually in contact with aluminium- unless the Stelvin is faulty. Isn't the aluminium screwcap merely a method to keep the liner snugly in place, and the liner actually provides the seal? Am I mistaken in this? Then there are aluminium wine bottles :!: - I guess these are used for wines to be drunk very young? Can't say I'm keen on this concept.
"It is very hard to make predictions, especially about the future." Samuel Goldwyn

User avatar
Michael McNally
Posts: 2084
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Michael McNally »

Nayan wrote:
Michael McNally wrote:Some interesting points.

However....

We don't make cork here...

Actually, you do...


We don't make significant amounts of cork here?

Funny that the press releases stop in 2004.......

Cheers

Michael
Bonum Vinum Laetificat Cor Hominis

GraemeG
Posts: 1737
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:53 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by GraemeG »

I think the argument was against copper being in the wine and bad for your health, and aluminium being used for the screwcap and being bad for the environment.
There was no suggestion there was aluminium in the wine.

Of course, aluminium can be recycled too, so perhaps it's not quite that bad. And if cork-TCA-ruined bottles are regarded as completely wasted, well, there's an environmental cost there too that's no longer being incurred when that wastage isn't happening under screwcap.

But the environmental argument is capable of extending in infinitely-widening circles, and without resolution, I'm sure...
cheers,
Graeme

User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 369
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Roscoe »

Deleted. Re-edited below.
Last edited by Roscoe on Mon May 10, 2010 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"It is very hard to make predictions, especially about the future." Samuel Goldwyn

User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 369
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Roscoe »

platinum wrote: Next time you are enjoying a wine under SC ponder alluminium and its toxicity to brain cells,

Hi Graeme
I was responding to this, which I took to be a comment in the Mount Mary mailer. I assumed that it refers to aluminium ingestion in the wine rather than environmental aluminium pollution, because I would be even more surprised if the latter was at potentially toxic levels.
Cheers
"It is very hard to make predictions, especially about the future." Samuel Goldwyn

User avatar
Sharkey
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Sharkey »

Nayan wrote:
Michael McNally wrote:Some interesting points.

However....

We don't make cork here...

Actually, you do...

In a first for Australia, two Portuguese 'cork strippers' - Manuel Silva and Manuel Graça - have harvested the Glenloch Cork Oak Plantation in Canberra's Stromlo Forest.


It looks like cork stripping involves a lot of Manuel labour :lol:
Sharkey

I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 369
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Roscoe »

Sharkey wrote:
Nayan wrote:
Michael McNally wrote:Some interesting points.

However....

We don't make cork here...

Actually, you do...

In a first for Australia, two Portuguese 'cork strippers' - Manuel Silva and Manuel Graça - have harvested the Glenloch Cork Oak Plantation in Canberra's Stromlo Forest.


It looks like cork stripping involves a lot of Manuel labour :lol:

A Quercy job. :roll:
"It is very hard to make predictions, especially about the future." Samuel Goldwyn

tpang
Posts: 283
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 7:47 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by tpang »

Would anyone be able to post a scan of the mailer? It would be great just to read exactly what it contained.

User avatar
Michael McNally
Posts: 2084
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Mount Mary Mailer Re; Closures

Post by Michael McNally »

Sharkey wrote:
Nayan wrote:
Michael McNally wrote:Some interesting points.

However....

We don't make cork here...

Actually, you do...

In a first for Australia, two Portuguese 'cork strippers' - Manuel Silva and Manuel Graça - have harvested the Glenloch Cork Oak Plantation in Canberra's Stromlo Forest.


It looks like cork stripping involves a lot of Manuel labour :lol:


Thanks for the belly laugh Sharkey!
Bonum Vinum Laetificat Cor Hominis

Post Reply