TN: Chave Hermitage 89, 94, 95, 97, 99, 02, 03 + Yquem 86

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
Phil Wilkins
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 7:25 am
Location: Cambridge, UK.

TN: Chave Hermitage 89, 94, 95, 97, 99, 02, 03 + Yquem 86

Post by Phil Wilkins »

Traveled to the big smoke for what I thought was going to be a simple lunch with a few good wines with friends. But oh no… we had a monumental wine line up which just showing the phenomenal generosity of the board members here.


The wines…

Chave Hermitage Blanc 2002
A delight when this opened. Hazelnuts, mineral, pear & flowers on the nose. The palate has a nice waxy note with rich yellow fruits, cleansing acidity, good depth & elegance and a fine finish. Drinking nicely right now. 91pts

Chave Hermitage 1989
Showing some age to the eye. The nose is delicious showing roasted meats, black fruits, cedar(!!!), leather and black tea. Great depth & interest on the medium bodied palate, with fine acids & a great finish. A very good bottle and probably needs more time. 95pts

Chave Hermitage 1994
The second bottle from my TWS purchase. This again is a delight with black fruits, bacon, spice and other secondary notes with a touch of Brett. The palate is more powerful than I remembered, beautifully balanced and a delight to drink now. I’ll have trouble keeping my hands off the remaining 4 bottles. 93pts

Chave Hermitage 1995
A very classic Chave on the nose with black/red fruits, violets, spice, earth and tar. The medium to full bodied palate is youthful, nicely focused with it’s pure fruit & high acidity. Very young. 94pts

Chave Hermitage 1997
This seemed, with hindsight, to be the odd one out. A delightful nose of black fruits, liquorice, caramel and currants. However the palate seemed ever so slightly disjointed, with jammy fruits & a slightly clipped mid palate. Perhaps I didn’t spend enough time with it? Very high acidity too, slightly masking the fruit. N/R

Chave Hermitage 1999
This was a delight & again classic Northern Rhone. Spice, mocha, bacon fat, blackberries & roasted meat. The full bodied palate was stunning and showed great structure, freshness, balance and length. Very young but still it was an absolute delight. 97pts

Chave Hermitage 2003
Holy s#it. The nose was identical copy of the same wine we had 26 months ago – absolutely unmistakable. There is something incredibly captivating and enchanting about it – velvet layered black fruit, minerals, espresso bean, incense, creosote and smoke and so utterly complex. The palate had changed slightly, still huge but it had lost a bit of its baby fat making the tannins slightly more prominent, great body, flavour, concentration and balance and a monumental finish. But it really is all about what’s on the nose with this wine for me, hence the big score. 100pts

Chateau d'Yquem 1986
Holy s#it, again. Charles really pulled out the stops here. This looks comparatively pale compared to the Kracker & boy what a stunning nose that shows incredible precision and complexity with pineapple, peach, vanilla pod, honeysuckle and chopped nuts. But the palate on this wine is for me has the marvellous magic. It has length & persistence that changes from second to second and flows over the palate in awe-inspiring complex waves with a finish that lasts well over a minute. Very young but what a super wine now. 97pts.

Kracher TBA #3 Nouvelle Vague 1999
This was the Chardonnay/Welschriesling cuvee. Far more flamboyant than the Yquem with orange & yellow fruits on the nose, sweet stewed apple, spice and honey. Slightly over ripe on the palate for me and lacks real depth & complexity, but it does have great cleansing acids & a long slightly cloying finish. But thankfully I’ve never had a bad Kracher. Lets hope Gerhard can fill his fathers steps since his untimely death. 90pts

Image

Mike Hawkins
Posts: 2747
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am

Post by Mike Hawkins »

Nice one Phil. You really dislike the Rhones don't you !

Great line up. I've never had the 03 Chave but I agree the 99 is a super wine, as is the 86 d'Yquem.

Have you had the 90 Chave ? If so, how does it compare to the 03?

Thanks Mike

monghead
Posts: 1769
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 10:28 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by monghead »

Great one Phil. Thanx.

What boards do you sit on... :shock:

dlo
Posts: 860
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: Canberra

Post by dlo »

I drank the 1989 in August last year and the wine was, intially, most unready. We decantered it and were forced to leave it for 24 hours due to its lack of composure. The next night the wine was utterly sublime and I awarded it 94 points.

Chave are so incredibly expensive these days it's not even mildly funny.

Luckily, I still have a magnum of the '82, some '83 (a surprisingly lovely wine) and a solitary '89 in the batcave.

Thanks for the report, Phil.
Cheers,

David

dlo
Posts: 860
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: Canberra

Post by dlo »

duplicate post
Last edited by dlo on Wed May 06, 2009 8:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers,

David

User avatar
Wayno
Posts: 1633
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 6:31 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Post by Wayno »

Is that Brian McGuigan there in the background, left? :)
Cheers
Wayno

Give me the luxuries of life and I will willingly do without the necessities.

Gianna
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: The world's most liveable city - Melbourne

Post by Gianna »

Once again Phil, a fantastic post and boy what a lunch ! :!: :!:

Generous friends and board members indeed...

I've not tried Chave ever, but will certainly find a few bottles to enjoy now.
At every turn, it pays to challenge orthodox ways of thinking

Post Reply