The winner is HoG - by a long way.
1999 Grange: Disapointing to be honest. A tired wine out of balance. The nose was dominated by oak, the black fruits struggling to make an appearance, no lifted notes. The palate lacked concentration, the acid had faded, leaving a flabby wine. The saving grace was the exquisite fine grained tannins. Perhaps a dodgy bottle - although no TCA detected.
1999 HoG: An exceptional wine. Great Balance. Still youthful. At the bigger end of medium bodied. Reminiscient of great Bordeaux. The nose was lifted, fruit driven, very complex, oak in balance. The palate was intense, complex, supported by the finest of powdery tannins.
This was my first Hill of Grace. I am interested to know if anyone else prefers HoG to Grange - in general.
Cheers,
Stuart
TN: 1999 Grange v 1999 Hill of Grace
-
- Posts: 2747
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am
HOG is a bit more up and down in my experience (which i admit is getting a bit dusty). Price means I seldom try it now and only have one bottle in the cellar which once gone wont be replaced
Agree with mike the 90 HOG was awesome also loved the 94. if you like your wines exotic then HOG is the go, if you like them more compact and structured Grange??
Agree with mike the 90 HOG was awesome also loved the 94. if you like your wines exotic then HOG is the go, if you like them more compact and structured Grange??
Follow me on Vivino for tasting notes Craig Thomson
-
- Posts: 3754
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 7:40 am
- Location: Fragrant Harbour.
-
- Posts: 3754
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 7:40 am
- Location: Fragrant Harbour.