TN Bleasdale Sparkling Shiraz (NV)

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
John #11
Posts: 483
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:57 am
Location: Adelaide

TN Bleasdale Sparkling Shiraz (NV)

Post by John #11 »

Dense, plummy, rich and delicious.
Nary a hint of sweetness, just some juvenile leather notes, and the complexity of a $50 SS.

A class above the Seppelts OSS (vintage).

They should vintage this, and ask a few dollars more!

$15-18
13% alcohol
high quality cork / cage

Drink now, or within 5 years.

Excellent. 92/100

User avatar
griff
Posts: 1906
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Sydney

Post by griff »

I agree it is very good (as good as Seppelt Original in the better vintages) but not as good as SS in the $50 bracket.

cheers

Carl
Bartenders are supposed to have people skills. Or was it people are supposed to have bartending skills?

pstarr
Posts: 373
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Post by pstarr »

John, I have to disagree here. The Bleasdale is decent sparkling red in its price bracket, and has an attractive profile of mulberry fruit, but is no better than that (for my tastes), and does come across a bit sweet. I drank several bottles of it alongside the settling-well 2004 vintage of the Seppelt's Original Sparkles while in Adelaide this Christmas. With groups including some keen red bubbles drinkers, the Bleasdale was enjoyed but the 2004 Seppelt OSS was preferred.

It is then a very long way from there to reach the complexity, depth, length and interest of top-tier Australian sparkling shiraz. This includes good bottles of the Seppelt Show, Leasingham Classic Clare, the Joseph from Primo Estate, Rockfords, Melton's etc. Not to mention the emerging mid-range options, such as the excellent first release of the Seppelt Silverband, or the first Pondalowie red bubbles release.
Paul.

ChrisV
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:07 pm

Post by ChrisV »

I have also found the Bleasdale pretty sweet. I much preferred the 04 Seppelt's but have tasted the 05 and am a bit dubious.

John #11
Posts: 483
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:57 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by John #11 »

Thanks guys.

I perhaps should have said I've had a few in the cellar for about 1 year, and they have improved significantly, particularly losing some of the early sweetness that you mention.

John

mattECN
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 9:22 am
Location: Adelaide Hills

Re: TN Bleasdale Sparkling Shiraz (NV)

Post by mattECN »

John #11 wrote:Dense, plummy, rich and delicious.
Nary a hint of sweetness, just some juvenile leather notes, and the complexity of a $50 SS.

A class above the Seppelts OSS (vintage).

They should vintage this, and ask a few dollars more!

$15-18
13% alcohol
high quality cork / cage

Drink now, or within 5 years.

Excellent. 92/100


I like it too. I tried it at cellar door a while ago and thoroughly enjoyed it.

ChrisV
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:07 pm

Post by ChrisV »

Yeah a lot of red bubbles seem to have a tendency to lose sweetness with a year or two in the cellar. The Seppelt's 04 was the same - I drank several of them young and enjoyed them, but one that I left until recently had really shaped up, less overtly sweet - drinking beautifully.

The Karatta Sparkling Shiraz Cabernet, which just took second place in sparkling wines (top sparkling red) in Winestate's WOTY contest, is the same - a bit cloyingly sweet right now. I have a couple of them left and intend to leave them for a year or so to see if they can pull off the same trick.

Post Reply