Last night I opened a Lindemans 1998 Pyrus. I must admit I was not wrapped in the wine. To my way of thinking, it was an Oz wine pretending to look like a Bordeaux. At 9 years of age, the fruit is not as bright as it would have been as a baby, the tannins are resolving nicely, but the acid is still as fresh as the day it was bottled. When the acid combines with the "green characters" (tobacco and mint) the result comes across as an acidic green wine.
I wondered why the hell I bought it, as I knew I had tried it years ago. My original tasting note shows it was rated as Recommended with ** for value. It seems that Brian found some for $29 a bottle, and that's why I bought it.
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
I then checked Oliver and JO's TN's......
JH Medium to full red-purple; luscious, deep, dark berry/blackcurrant aromas flow into a blackcurrant and cassis-flavoured palate. The wine has good structure thanks to clearly defined but ripe tannins, and will (by the standards of Pyrus) be long lived. 94 points drink 03-13
JO Very stylish and elegant; at last a Pyrus you can take seriously. From its perfume of wild violets, sweet red cherries and raspberries to its bright, shapely and crystal-clear palate of pure red and black fruits, spicy fine-grained oak and light tobaccoey merlot influences, it's an accomplished, finely crafted and willowy wine. (18.8, Drink 2006-2010+, $53 retail approx.)
Oliver nailed with "willowly" but my origional Recommended wiould still the today's rating. I woinder how the other two would rate it now?
If 13% alcohol means wines like this, I am glad they are generally higher.
Now what have you guys been drinkin? Lists, vibes or TN's welcome.