1998 Jacobs Creek Limited Release Cab Sauv

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
Matthew Moate
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:15 am
Location: Adelaide

1998 Jacobs Creek Limited Release Cab Sauv

Post by Matthew Moate »

Guys, I was lucky enough to attend the opening of the Jacobs Creek Visitor Centre in the Barossa a few years ago. At the event everyone who attended recieved a bottle of 1998 Jacobs Creek Limited Release Cab Sauv. One of those numbered jobbies and at the time I think I remember someone telling me they only release about 500 cases of this wine. Which while this is the production of some small wineries is a relative limited release for Orlando.

It is in a nice box / foam and has been cellared well.

I have a couple of quetions:

1. What would you think the drinking window of this wine would be.
2. Would this wine have increased in value and what would it be worth today?
3. Has anyone had one recently?

Look forward to some responses. Matt

User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Post by Red Bigot »

Matthew,

If this is the wine I think it is, it was originally sold at a price much less than the previous and subsequent Limited Release wines. I got my dozen for $23pb delivered in March 2002. It was intially a lovely wine, but didn't seem to have the structure of the other LR reds, and peaked around 2005-2006 for my palate. I've either drunk or sold to friends all of mine, thought I had one left but can't find it.

There ar a few at auction or other specialists in older wines, some at very optimistic prices, it last sold at Langtons for $27++.
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)

Matthew Moate
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:15 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by Matthew Moate »

Yeah thanks for that. I had a look at Stirling Auctions price history and they have been selling them for about $24 - $27 recently. It was just one of those bottles that was 'Special' to me because of the event. So I shoud get meal together and enjoy it now... Thanks for your help. Got it fot free so can't complain... Matt

TORB
Posts: 2493
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: Bowral NSW
Contact:

Post by TORB »

I had my last one a couple of weeks ago and it was certainly enjoyable, but as Brian said it didn't have the structure to improve with age. Initially when I tried it at the winery, I thought differently and thought it would be long lived, but it just held on and didn't go anywhere.
Cheers
Ric
TORBWine

Anthony Basilone
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 11:39 am
Location: Newport

Post by Anthony Basilone »

TORB wrote:I had my last one a couple of weeks ago and it was certainly enjoyable, but as Brian said it didn't have the structure to improve with age. Initially when I tried it at the winery, I thought differently and thought it would be long lived, but it just held on and didn't go anywhere.


Ric, have you tried the '99 since your TN of Dec. '03 and if so do you have the same concerns for it as the '98?

I had a '99 about 10 months ago, thought it was an absolute pup. Have not had the '98 so can't compare, but the '99 (IMHO) didn't want for any structure.

TIA

TORB
Posts: 2493
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: Bowral NSW
Contact:

Post by TORB »

Hi Anthony,

Sorry I have not tried the 99 since. many of those 99's are pretty good and may last a lot longer than the 98's, so your finding is not a surprise.
Cheers
Ric
TORBWine

User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Post by Red Bigot »

Anthony Basilone wrote:
TORB wrote:I had my last one a couple of weeks ago and it was certainly enjoyable, but as Brian said it didn't have the structure to improve with age. Initially when I tried it at the winery, I thought differently and thought it would be long lived, but it just held on and didn't go anywhere.


Ric, have you tried the '99 since your TN of Dec. '03 and if so do you have the same concerns for it as the '98?

I had a '99 about 10 months ago, thought it was an absolute pup. Have not had the '98 so can't compare, but the '99 (IMHO) didn't want for any structure.

TIA


Anthony, the Limited Release Shiraz-Cabernets usually want for nothing in terms of structure and ageing potential, the one-off (so far) LR Cabernet Sauvignon seems to be a batch they had that was too good for the Reserve level, excess to blending requirements but not really good enough for the LR level, hence the price below the usual level of the LR series. There was also a 98 Shiraz-Cabernet Limited Release. I think the LR series has now become the Johann label.
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)

User avatar
n4sir
Posts: 4020
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 10:53 pm
Location: Adelaide

Post by n4sir »

TORB wrote:Hi Anthony,

Sorry I have not tried the 99 since. many of those 99's are pretty good and may last a lot longer than the 98's, so your finding is not a surprise.


Is Anthony talking about the same wine Ric? :?

I thought the 1998 wine being discussed in the thread was the Jacobs Creek 25th Anniversary Barossa Cabernet Sauvignon (as far as I know a one-off) as opposed to the Jacobs Creek Limted Release Barossa Shiraz Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon (now the Johann) which has been made a few times (including 98 & 99) which is a vastly superior wine.

Cheers,
Ian
Forget about goodness and mercy, they're gone.

User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Post by Red Bigot »

Ian, read AB's post above that Ric responded to... You missed the subtle thread drift. :-)
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)

Anthony Basilone
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 11:39 am
Location: Newport

Post by Anthony Basilone »

Red Bigot wrote:
Anthony Basilone wrote:
TORB wrote:I had my last one a couple of weeks ago and it was certainly enjoyable, but as Brian said it didn't have the structure to improve with age. Initially when I tried it at the winery, I thought differently and thought it would be long lived, but it just held on and didn't go anywhere.


Ric, have you tried the '99 since your TN of Dec. '03 and if so do you have the same concerns for it as the '98?

I had a '99 about 10 months ago, thought it was an absolute pup. Have not had the '98 so can't compare, but the '99 (IMHO) didn't want for any structure.

TIA


Anthony, the Limited Release Shiraz-Cabernets usually want for nothing in terms of structure and ageing potential, the one-off (so far) LR Cabernet Sauvignon seems to be a batch they had that was too good for the Reserve level, excess to blending requirements but not really good enough for the LR level, hence the price below the usual level of the LR series. There was also a 98 Shiraz-Cabernet Limited Release. I think the LR series has now become the Johann label.


Sorry guys. Brian and Ian are right i was talking about the LR Shiraz-Cab. :oops:

User avatar
n4sir
Posts: 4020
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 10:53 pm
Location: Adelaide

Post by n4sir »

Red Bigot wrote:Ian, read AB's post above that Ric responded to... You missed the subtle thread drift. :-)


Yeah, the thread drift was so subtle it seems we both needed to point it out about the same time :oops: :lol:
Forget about goodness and mercy, they're gone.

Jay60A
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:01 pm
Location: Richmond, Surrey

Post by Jay60A »

Red Bigot wrote:
Anthony Basilone wrote:
TORB wrote:I had my last one a couple of weeks ago and it was certainly enjoyable, but as Brian said it didn't have the structure to improve with age. Initially when I tried it at the winery, I thought differently and thought it would be long lived, but it just held on and didn't go anywhere.


Ric, have you tried the '99 since your TN of Dec. '03 and if so do you have the same concerns for it as the '98?

I had a '99 about 10 months ago, thought it was an absolute pup. Have not had the '98 so can't compare, but the '99 (IMHO) didn't want for any structure.

TIA


Anthony, the Limited Release Shiraz-Cabernets usually want for nothing in terms of structure and ageing potential, the one-off (so far) LR Cabernet Sauvignon seems to be a batch they had that was too good for the Reserve level, excess to blending requirements but not really good enough for the LR level, hence the price below the usual level of the LR series. There was also a 98 Shiraz-Cabernet Limited Release. I think the LR series has now become the Johann label.


Brian fwiw I saw a Jacobs Creek LR Cabernet Sauvignon 2002 in Bangkok airport a couple of weeks ago, so not sure it was a one-off. Nearly picked it up to try but as the tax on wine in Thailand is 100% I passed in the end.

Otherwise the old LR Shiraz Cabernet has become the Johann.
“There are no standards of taste in wine. Each mans own taste is the standard, and a majority vote cannot decide for him or in any slightest degree affect the supremacy of his own standard". Mark Twain.

User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Post by Red Bigot »

Bloody typical, nothing on their web site of course.

How much was it in Baht?
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)

Jay60A
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:01 pm
Location: Richmond, Surrey

Post by Jay60A »

Red Bigot wrote:Bloody typical, nothing on their web site of course.

How much was it in Baht?


Either 1200 or 1400 baht, I forget which but either 50 or 60aud is a bit exy for this wine! I love the JC premiums as they are often real value for money ...

I was tempted as I'd never seen it elsewhere but not at that price. Doesn't show up on Wine Searcher Pro at all but I swear I saw it at the new Bangkok airport.

In fact I remember the '02 label and specifically checking it was *not* Centenary Hill shiraz ...

Anyone tried it (or even seen it?)

Jay
“There are no standards of taste in wine. Each mans own taste is the standard, and a majority vote cannot decide for him or in any slightest degree affect the supremacy of his own standard". Mark Twain.

User avatar
Wayno
Posts: 1633
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 6:31 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Post by Wayno »

The 99 LR was way too young when last I tried it. I-ve only heard good reports about the 98 though, FWIW.
Cheers
Wayno

Give me the luxuries of life and I will willingly do without the necessities.

User avatar
dazza1968
Posts: 444
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:36 pm
Location: Perth Australia

time to drinkit

Post by dazza1968 »

It sounds like i better try a bottle to let you know how they are traveling as i still have a six pack hiding in its box, mind you when i had the first half they were great so thats why i left it alone and knowing a couple of people at the wi nery they still rate it 8)
Some people slurp it,others swill it,a few sip on it,some gaze at it for hours ,enough now wheres the RED

User avatar
dazza1968
Posts: 444
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:36 pm
Location: Perth Australia

time to drinkit

Post by dazza1968 »

It sounds like i better try a bottle to let you know how they are traveling as i still have a six pack hiding in its box, mind you when i had the first half they were great so thats why i left it alone and knowing a couple of people at the wi nery they still rate it 8)
Some people slurp it,others swill it,a few sip on it,some gaze at it for hours ,enough now wheres the RED

Post Reply