The Great Shiraz Challenge

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
Nick
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 9:40 am
Location: Adelaide

The Great Shiraz Challenge

Post by Nick »

Well OK, if no-one else is going to start this thread I might as well.

My first one of these events, and after a relatively heavy Saturday night, the first few tastes were fairly heavy going. I have never had a blacker tongue, or teeth, and would you believe I ran into my dentist right at the end of the day. Fortunately her teeth looked about as bad as mine, so all's well.

Anyway, my top 6 ended up:
1. 2002 Mitchelton Print Shiraz
2. 200? Gibson Old Vine Shiraz
3. 2004 Turkey Flat Shiraz
4. 2004 Marius Symphony Shiraz
5. 2004 Torbreck The Struie Shiraz
6. 2004 Kalleske Greenock Shiraz

Very difficult to get accurate and effective tasting notes when you're tasting that many wines, so general impressions were:

I still can't get my head around Coonawarra Shiraz. With the exception of the Majella (which almost made it to top 6), the remaining Coonawarras just didn't have the generosity of fruit and came off a little weedy and/or flat.

Top value pick probably goes to 2003 Hugo Shiraz. I reckon this is a belter at $16 or $17 cellar door. Beautiful ripe fruit, nicely handled oak, drinking smoothly at present.

My palate's tolerance for oak goes down the more Shiraz I drink. By the end of the day I'd smell something like the Hardy's Tintara and know I wasn't going to love it before it even hit my tongue.

There's probably a lot more specific memories floating around somewhere in my head, but that'll do for now.

As an interesting sidetrack, how much alcohol can you absorb through the mouth? According to my tasting sheet I tasted and spat 66 wines, then drove home. About half way home, realised that if I'd only swallowed 10ml of each wine then I'd almost consumed a bottle! Any thoughts or evidence?

Cheers
Nick

Alex F
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:45 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Alex F »

n4sir wrote:I went to the Edinburgh's 200 Shiraz Challenge Sunday & caught up with Gavin, quite a few of the Blacktongues (who actually decided to show up this week) and a couple of lurkers from here too.

My votes for the day went to (in order):

1. 2004 Turkey Flat
2. 2004 Gibson Old Vine
3. 2004 Kalleske Greenock
4. 2004 Marius Simpatico
5. 2002 Majella
6. 2004 Schild Estate Barossa

From what I heard my top three were in quite a lot of other peoples votes too - it will be interesting to find out the final results.

Cheers,
Ian

Ian S
Posts: 2759
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:21 am
Location: Norwich, England

Re: The Great Shiraz Challenge

Post by Ian S »

Nick wrote:As an interesting sidetrack, how much alcohol can you absorb through the mouth? According to my tasting sheet I tasted and spat 66 wines, then drove home. About half way home, realised that if I'd only swallowed 10ml of each wine then I'd almost consumed a bottle! Any thoughts or evidence?

Cheers
Nick

No evidence, but there always used to be a bit of debate about if you got a breathalyser test positive, whether it would be beneficial to ask for a blood test (you used to be able to ask for one of these in UK). I suspect your breath might show a higher reading than your blood in that situation.

regards

Ian

Alex F
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:45 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Alex F »

At the good food and wine show I tasted a lot of wines, swallowed 4 tasting glasses worth, went to the breathalyser place an hour later and read 0. Now I wonder whether that was an accurate read... or maybe my breath just smelt bad.

User avatar
Jordan
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Canberra

Post by Jordan »

A great day had and a fantastic opportunity to try before I buy. Only problem is, I didn't realise how much I now want to buy.

1. Coriole Lloyd Reserve 2004
2. Turkey Flat 2004
3. Marius Symphony 2004
4. Gibson 2004
5. Kalleske 2004
6. Two Hands Lily's Garden

Great Value Wine: Longhop 2004 @ $13
Premierships and great wine... that is what life is all about

Nick
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 9:40 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by Nick »

Sorry Ian, hadn't noticed your post on the other thread.

Reading other people's votes I've just realised there's one problem with the format of the day - so much to taste, so little time. I didn't get to Schild or Longhop, and they'd run out of the Lloyd by the time I got to Coriole. I guess there's always next year...

I was thinking while I was tasting that it was a shame that the spread was so heavily weighted South Australian. I know we make great Shiraz over here and all, but I got to the point at one stage where I was looking for anything but another big in-your-face McLaren Vale Shiraz.

Cheers
Nick

caper
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:22 pm
Location: UK and Cape winelands

Post by caper »

was the Giaconda Warner Vineyards shiraz in this tasting? Surely one of the greatest wines made in Australia.
stretch your mind----drink wine blind

User avatar
n4sir
Posts: 4023
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 10:53 pm
Location: Adelaide

Post by n4sir »

For those of you who are interested, the official final results of the day's voting:

Best Shiraz over $25:

1st: 2004 Kalleske Greenock - $40.00
2nd: 2004 Gibson Old Vine - $77.00
3rd: 2001 Classic McLaren La Testa - $43.00
4th: 2004 Battle of Bosworth White Boar - $37.00
5th: 2004 Two Hands Lily's Garden - $47.00
6th: 2000 Woodstock The Stocks - $40.00

Best Shiraz under $25.00

1st: 2004 Tiltili - $17.00
2nd: 2004 Beresford - $15.00
3rd: 2004 Wicks Estate - $16.00
4th: 2003 Morgan Simpson - $15.00
5th: 2004 Petaringa Undercover - $17.00
6th: 2005 Mr. Riggs The Gaffer - $17.00

Cheers,
Ian
Forget about goodness and mercy, they're gone.

User avatar
rednut
Posts: 302
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:07 pm
Location: South Aust.

Re: The Great Shiraz Challenge

Post by rednut »

Ian S wrote:
Nick wrote:As an interesting sidetrack, how much alcohol can you absorb through the mouth? According to my tasting sheet I tasted and spat 66 wines, then drove home. About half way home, realised that if I'd only swallowed 10ml of each wine then I'd almost consumed a bottle! Any thoughts or evidence?

Cheers
Nick

No evidence, but there always used to be a bit of debate about if you got a breathalyser test positive, whether it would be beneficial to ask for a blood test (you used to be able to ask for one of these in UK). I suspect your breath might show a higher reading than your blood in that situation.

regards

Ian


As a person in this line of work I can only say that to my knowledge you would absorb some alcohol through your mouth particularly under your tongue but as it is in and out fairly quickly not a lot has time to enter the blood stream.
I you were to keep it in your mouth for a longer period of time well thats a different story I would suppose.

Interesting site on alcohol absorption:

http://www.science.org.au/nova/052/052key.htm

http://www.arrivealive.co.za/medical.as ... absorbtion

As for the blood test after every person is subjected to a breath analysis they are given the option to a blood test.
I am yet to see one come back lower than the breath test result though. .
Last edited by rednut on Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:53 am, edited 2 times in total.
"A woman drove me to drink, and I'll be a son of a gun but I never even wrote to thank her" WC Fields

User avatar
griff
Posts: 1906
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Sydney

Post by griff »

Seem to remember a reference to absorbing about 10% of the alcohol in the mouth but is variable. Wish I could remember where I read that.

Got to remember buccal absorption is a valid absorption method (think chewing tobacco) and ethanol is quite a small molecule and can dissolve in water and in fat (both important for buccal/oral obsorption). Lastly, the amount of time in the mouth is quite important.

cheers

Carl
Bartenders are supposed to have people skills. Or was it people are supposed to have bartending skills?

Post Reply