Guess the Wine - wk begin 5/6

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
User avatar
Andrew Jordan
Posts: 775
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:53 am
Location: Sydney

Guess the Wine - wk begin 5/6

Post by Andrew Jordan »

Ok ... this is getting harder than I thought. :?

But let's try once more. If you guys (Maximus) can Google this then I give up!

This weeks wine (part II), and hopefully Google proof:

TASTING NOTE 1
"Deep purple-red ... lusciously ripe and powerful black fruits/blackberry/blackcurrant fruit ... powerful lingering tannins ... oak absorbed".

TASTING NOTE 2
" ... heavyweight, tannic ... luscious flesh of black, intense, mulberry ... the smoky swirl of oak ... drenched in sweet rich chocolate ... minted blackcurrant, and the bright lift of red ripe plums. It’s a strong, tannic, concentrated beast, and in its style it’s a terrific drop.".


I have provided a few options in a couple of the categories.

Country - Australia
State - Vic/Nsw/Sa
Region - :roll:
Varietial - Shiraz/Cabernet/Cabernet-Shiraz
Year - 1998/2000/2002
Winery - :roll:
Name of Wine - :roll:

Have fun. Will reveal State tomorrow.



WINNER LEADERBOARD - YEAR
1 win - Maximus, SueNZ




RULES
Each week 1 or more tasting notes from published wine critics will be given (that will remain anonymous) that all refer to the same wine. It is then up to the Forum to try and guess what the wine is. Points will be given to each Forum member that guess the correct answer about the wine before it is revealed. The categories that will attract points for the right answers are the following:

Country - Will always be Australia (no points awarded)
State - 2 points
Region - 2 points
Varietial - 3 points
Year - 4 points
Winery - 5 points
Name of Wine - 1 point

Guess the Reviewer - 1 point for each correct guess


Everyday one/two categories will be revealed, which will then allow each Forum member to change their guesses for the remaining categories if they want to. This will continue each day until the wine is revealed. The winner is the person with the most points at the end of the week. Unfortunately, there are no prizes, just a chance to show off your wine guessing prowess on the WWW.
Last edited by Andrew Jordan on Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:11 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Cheers
AJ

Cabernet is ... and will always be ... KING!

User avatar
Winefront Monthly
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 1:33 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by Winefront Monthly »

Can I take a guess?

:D

Campbell.

User avatar
Gavin Trott
Posts: 1860
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:01 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Post by Gavin Trott »

Winefront Monthly wrote:Can I take a guess?

:D

Campbell.


Depends if you wrote one of the notes!!

:lol: :lol:
regards

Gavin Trott

User avatar
Winefront Monthly
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 1:33 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by Winefront Monthly »

I always recognise my own words.

Not that I'm giving anything away.

Campbell.

:D

GraemeG
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:53 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by GraemeG »

Winefront Monthly wrote:I always recognise my own words.

Not that I'm giving anything away.

Campbell.

:D


Yes, I thought Note 2 read like one of Campbell's...
cheers,
Graeme

User avatar
GRB
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by GRB »

Now you just have to keep Campbell quiet :roll:

State - SA
Region - Barossa
Varietial - Shiraz Cab
Year - 2002
Winery - Kaesler
Name of Wine - WOMS

Campbell and someone else.

Glen
Winner of the inaugural RB cork-count competition
Runner up RB-NTDIR competition
Runner up TORB TN competition
Leave of absence second RB c-c competition

MartinE
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 8:47 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by MartinE »

GRB wrote:Now you just have to keep Campbell quiet :roll:

State - SA
Region - Barossa
Varietial - Shiraz Cab
Year - 2002
Winery - Kaesler
Name of Wine - WOMS

Campbell and someone else.

Glen


What he said with Campbell and JO as the critics.

M.

Davo
Posts: 1120
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:09 pm

Post by Davo »

SA
Barossa
Shiraz CAb
2002
Kaesler
WOMS

Oliver and Campbell

User avatar
Winefront Monthly
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 1:33 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by Winefront Monthly »

I apologise. I will be quiet in future.

Campbell.

User avatar
cranky
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 1:27 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by cranky »

Country - Australia
State - SA
Region -Clare
Varietial - Shiraz
Year -2002
Winery - Killikanoon
Name of Wine - Oracle

reviewers Huon and Campbell (bandwagon time!)

(even though it sounds like it has some cabernet characters...)

User avatar
Christo
Posts: 373
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 5:16 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Christo »

..follow the leader!

SA
Barossa
Shiraz CAb
2002
Kaesler
WOMS
8)

cd

oh CM & JO
"You are what u drink!"

Mike Hawkins
Posts: 2747
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am

Post by Mike Hawkins »

Obviously I'm late to the game - time zones don't help. As soon as I read the TNs, 2002 WOMS stood out to me as well.....

User avatar
Sharkey
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Post by Sharkey »

OK. I'll play left field.

Country - Australia
State - Victoria
Region - Pyrenees
Varietial - Cabernet
Year - 2000
Winery - Redbank
Name of Wine – Sally’s Paddock
Sharkey

I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

User avatar
Maximus
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Central Otago
Contact:

Post by Maximus »

Tip:

Don't follow the leader. :wink: 8)
Max
-----
Avant d’être bon, un vin doit être vrai

mphatic
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:59 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by mphatic »

Country - Australia
State - Vic
Region - Heathcote
Varietal - Shiraz
Year - 2002
Winery - WDCE
Wine - Duck Muck

Deejay
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:36 pm
Location: Perth

Post by Deejay »

Country - Australia
State - SA
Region - Clare
Varietal - Shiraz
Year - 1998
Winery - Jim Barry
Wine - Armagh

Cellar Rat
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 7:57 pm
Location: Canberra

Post by Cellar Rat »

Kaesler Barossa Valley W.O.M.S. Shiraz Cabernet 2002

I suggest you use TN's from people that don't have online databases, like White, White, Hooke, etc.
Cheers,

CR

Deejay
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:36 pm
Location: Perth

Post by Deejay »

I suggest you use TN's from people that don't have online databases, like White, White, Hooke, etc.


Or people could just guess based on the notes, without searching - It is more fun having a blind guess - it is not as if you win anything

Dave

User avatar
Andrew Jordan
Posts: 775
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:53 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Andrew Jordan »

Ok State is ....

Country - Australia
State - South Australia

Region - McClaren Vale/Barossa/Clare
Varietial - Shiraz/Cabernet/Cabernet-Shiraz
Year - 1998/2000/2002
Winery - :roll:
Name of Wine - :roll:

Will reveal Region tomorrow.

Change the rest of your guesses if you want to. Still plenty of points out there on offer.

Remember to make sure you put your guesses down for reviewers as well.

WEEKLY LEADERBOARD SO FAR:

2 points - GRB, MartinE, Davo, cranky, Christo, Mike Hawkins, Deejay, Cellar Rat
0 points - Sharkey, mphatic
-2 points - Campbell
Cheers
AJ

Cabernet is ... and will always be ... KING!

Deejay
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:36 pm
Location: Perth

Post by Deejay »

Hooke and Mattinson

SueNZ
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 6:22 am
Location: Auckland, NZ
Contact:

Post by SueNZ »

I obviously missed something here. I'm late to the thread, it is Thursday, and region hasn't been revealed.
So was it the Kaesler WOMS - which I had to look up to find meant Weapon of Mass Destruction - to someone's liver no doubt?
LOL.
I couldn't find it on Google, for what it is worth, and I don't have Oliver's and Mattinson's online databases. Though I would have gone SA with those options and those notes.

Alex F
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:45 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Alex F »

always thought it meant weapons of mass seduction... but...

SueNZ
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 6:22 am
Location: Auckland, NZ
Contact:

Post by SueNZ »

Alex F wrote:always thought it meant weapons of mass seduction... but...


Yeah - you're right, I got it wrong. Never seen or tasted the wine. Don't even know if it comes to NZ. But I am sure it is seductive.

Apologies to the crew.

User avatar
Maximus
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Central Otago
Contact:

Post by Maximus »

Sue,

Yes, it comes into New Zealand. I sourced half a dozen for myself last year, and I was greedy. I only have two left. I had to show it off to all the Aussies that came over to visit me. Last I heard there were only a couple of loose bottles floating around. Brought in by Hancocks. Let me know if you want some tracked down. It's a superb wine. Contrary to the tasting notes of this thread (if in fact it was the WOMS), I wouldn't have called it a tannic wine. I think it sells circa $60-$70 over here.

Cheers,
Max
-----
Avant d’être bon, un vin doit être vrai

SueNZ
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 6:22 am
Location: Auckland, NZ
Contact:

Post by SueNZ »

Thanks Maximus,
Now I remember Glengary is the agent for Kaesler. Maybe they will have it for tasting at their next road show, if I get invited.
Everyone is saying this WOMS is a Shiraz-Cab, yet the option is Cabernet-Shiraz !!
I looked up the Kaesler website and they don't actually say what the blend is. In fact they don't say much at all.
Cheers,
Sue

User avatar
cranky
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 1:27 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by cranky »

Well, it has been a week without an update... is everyone okay out there?

Or was it all just too googlin' disappointing? :wink:

Post Reply