James Suckling Top 100 Australian Wines

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
User avatar
Craig(NZ)
Posts: 3246
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: James Suckling Top 100 Australian Wines

Post by Craig(NZ) »

TiggerK wrote:Very interested here too.... can't help but feel it might still be a bit oak heavy for my tastes, I'm becoming very obvious-oak-averse and while I try to be patriotic, oak isn't something NZ has handled well over the past 20 years IMHO. Yet by all accounts the times they are a changing which is an exciting prospect for NZ wine.
On the whole you are correct, though still I would say making in NZ has on average been more subtle than Australia

I don't think you will have the same criticism with 2015 Homage. It is definitely a watershed wine and one that I think anyone serious about following the development of wine over time in NZ has to try

User avatar
michel
Posts: 1356
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:51 am
Location: Helsinki

Re: James Suckling Top 100 Australian Wines

Post by michel »

Craig(NZ) wrote:
michel wrote:
TiggerK wrote:Very interested here too.... can't help but feel it might still be a bit oak heavy for my tastes, I'm becoming very obvious-oak-averse and while I try to be patriotic, oak isn't something NZ has handled well over the past 20 years IMHO. Yet by all accounts the times they are a changing which is an exciting prospect for NZ wine.
http://www.geoffkellywinereviews.co.nz/inde ... icleID=217

Looking at a bottle of Esk Valley Terraces 100% new oak
Compare the tasting notes and comments of the top two wines
For example


; Tanzer, 96: intensely perfumed (NZ winemakers please note, how do you smell floral components if the wine is over-oaked, vanillin alone is not enough)



La Chapelle 20% new oak
At some stage balance has to realised.......
I never thought I would see the day that over-oaking was a topic on an auswine thread lol

My opinion on Terraces is that after losing its way 2000-2009, the 2013-2015 are back on form and are brilliant wines. They have some real structure and depth and have performed very well in the last two blind tastings I have attended with them in the mix
Over 10 or so years the notes here are more eclectic with Italian & French...
I personally have noted a creeping appreciation for wines in balance-especially oak and alcohol
I am practicing on a 2014 Trinity Hill The Gimblett as warmup to the Shiraz Homage in a few days.
International Chambertin Day 16th May

User avatar
Craig(NZ)
Posts: 3246
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: James Suckling Top 100 Australian Wines

Post by Craig(NZ) »

michel wrote:
Craig(NZ) wrote:
michel wrote:

I am practicing on a 2014 Trinity Hill The Gimblett as warmup to the Shiraz Homage in a few days.
The 2014 is ok, but not as good as the 2013 in my lauded opinion

User avatar
michel
Posts: 1356
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:51 am
Location: Helsinki

Re: James Suckling Top 100 Australian Wines

Post by michel »

Craig(NZ) wrote:
michel wrote:
Craig(NZ) wrote:
The 2014 is ok, but not as good as the 2013 in my lauded opinion
2014 bit unyielding
2013 earlier in the week blossomed with haunting perfume
International Chambertin Day 16th May

Post Reply