Blends vs Varietal

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
Panda 9D
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:01 am

Blends vs Varietal

Post by Panda 9D »

This topic might be elsewhere so feel free to move it/delete it if need be. I was wondering what people thought about this. I think Australia should be making more blends with their A-grade fruit and not just putting their B-grade into a GSM or something like that. Is anyone noticing a shift toward blends in Australian wine?

User avatar
Waiters Friend
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 4:09 am
Location: Perth WA

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by Waiters Friend »

A good subject, Panda 9D

I think the emphasis on varietals, and the inherent assumption that a wine was somehow better or purer as a varietal, has been slowly reducing since around 2000, and heading back towards equilibrium - where whatever makes the best wine should go into it.

I was at a barrel tasting on Sunday with a small Perth Hills producer, who makes a large number of hatfuls of wine, and explores blending opportunities. They make varietals as well, but their flagship red is always a blend, and there is no shortage of national and international icons that use blending to make the best wine.

Also, most varietal wines are blends of different parcels, pickings and sites, that make the best example of that variety for the winery concerned.

Cheers

Allan
Wine, women and song. Ideally, you can experience all three at once.

Mike Hawkins
Posts: 2796
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by Mike Hawkins »

Penfolds make some really good blends from time to time with their Special Bin and Cellar Reserve labels. The fruit in those are definitely A grade, and the same for Wolf Blass Black Label. To your point, it would be good to see more like them.

Panda 9D
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:01 am

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by Panda 9D »

Yeah, Penfold's is the obvious exception but the majority of wineries put their best fruit into varietal wines. I just wonder if people see this continuing into the future.

User avatar
phillisc
Posts: 3544
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:24 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by phillisc »

Majella Mallea
Yalumba signature
Petaluma Coonawarra
Cullen DM
Howard Park
MM Quintet
YY blends
Wendouree blends
Redbank Sally's
Bleasdale Frank Potts
Rockford rod and spur...
Pennies 389

Wynns centenary and old Virgin Hills...the best blends i have ever had

all crackers happily sitting in the cellar
Yep agree should be more of these

cheers
Craig
Tomorrow will be a good day

Rossco
Posts: 1074
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:49 am

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by Rossco »

I used to be in the exact same boat a few years ago refusing to drink blends believing they were all made from inferior fruit.

THEN i had the David Franz Cab/Shiraz and was absolutely blown away. Its was rich, sumptuous and even though it was a few years
ago, I still remember the taste, how much i enjoyed it & where I was (at Moo Moo's on the GC)

Since then, Majella The Malleea & John Duval Plexus GSM have become favourites as well as my first blend love Uncle Dave :-D

User avatar
rens
Posts: 1425
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by rens »

I had similar thoughts the other day. I was at the local big chain looking at the Teusner FG range. Grenache, Shiraz and Mataro all single vineyard stuff. Every time I've had it (I've only had the shiraz- 06 and 09)I've thought they were very good wines. But I did wounder what an GSM FG would be like. Perhaps I'll send Kym an email because surely he would have experimented... surely?
never underestimate the predictability of stupidity

Peter Schlesinger
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:32 pm

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by Peter Schlesinger »

rens wrote:I had similar thoughts the other day. I was at the local big chain looking at the Teusner FG range. Grenache, Shiraz and Mataro all single vineyard stuff. Every time I've had it (I've only had the shiraz- 06 and 09)I've thought they were very good wines. But I did wounder what an GSM FG would be like. Perhaps I'll send Kym an email because surely he would have experimented... surely?


Rens I'm not sure you need to spend all those bucks on a bottle from the FG range to get a feel for what Kym can do with a blend. The current sub $20 shiraz/mataro release of "The Independent" has been very well received. Still haven't tried it myself but it's on my to do list. Seems like shiraz/mataro is the new cabernet/shiraz combination that Penfolds worked so beautifully last millenium.

Polymer
Posts: 1775
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:40 pm

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by Polymer »

I think a lot of the Cabernet Sauvignon we see are actually blends but because they hit that 85% mark they just say Cabernet Sauvignon....I think more so in WA....Bordeaux blends are pretty normal IMO..but I do agree that a lot of people seem to perceive blends as inferior and that is reinforced by the fact that most of the blends they see ARE inferior because the fruit used was not as good...
A lot of good Cab Shiraz blends though...as as Peter said, Shiraz Mataro is looking pretty good as they're figuring out how to balance the fruit w/ some savoury characters and getting some good acidity from the Mataro...
GSM blends, given their place in the market right now as far as what they can get price wise...not sure we will see top tier fruit in there or in there often ...although there are some really good examples (John Duval Plexus).

kaos
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:44 pm

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by kaos »

I thought it was roundly agreed that Cabernet Sauvignon SHOULD be blended for best results. I, for one, would like to see a lot more Cab Franc planted and used in this country.... I'm not a big fan of cab/shiraz blending - hard for me to really articulate why. But doing wacky things can have very pleasing results. I had a pinot/shiraz blend from the Bellarine region that was a perfectly harmonious and successful blend. I reckon we could see more of that (I'd rather aromatics and mouthfeel from a small percentage of pinot than viognier)......

User avatar
rens
Posts: 1425
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by rens »

Peter Schlesinger wrote:
rens wrote:I had similar thoughts the other day. I was at the local big chain looking at the Teusner FG range. Grenache, Shiraz and Mataro all single vineyard stuff. Every time I've had it (I've only had the shiraz- 06 and 09)I've thought they were very good wines. But I did wounder what an GSM FG would be like. Perhaps I'll send Kym an email because surely he would have experimented... surely?


Rens I'm not sure you need to spend all those bucks on a bottle from the FG range to get a feel for what Kym can do with a blend. The current sub $20 shiraz/mataro release of "The Independent" has been very well received. Still haven't tried it myself but it's on my to do list. Seems like shiraz/mataro is the new cabernet/shiraz combination that Penfolds worked so beautifully last millenium.



Hi Peter. I'm a big fan of Avatar (I must have more than 2 dozen accross 6 vintages in the cellar) and just wondered what it would be like with the very best fruit.

FG, I'd imagine (Just before a smart arse gets in)...
never underestimate the predictability of stupidity

Peter Schlesinger
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:32 pm

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by Peter Schlesinger »

Hi Peter. I'm a big fan of Avatar (I must have more than 2 dozen accross 6 vintages in the cellar) and just wondered what it would be like with the very best fruit.

FG, I'd imagine (Just before a smart arse gets in)...[/quote]

I'm with you on that Rens. I'm also drinking Roger Pike's 2007 shiraz mouvedre (Symposium) while I'm typing. Normally this would not have lasted the night it was opened but lots of things got in the way. Three days on and it's still singing. Now to track down that Independent.

Mike Hawkins
Posts: 2796
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by Mike Hawkins »

kaos wrote:I thought it was roundly agreed that Cabernet Sauvignon SHOULD be blended for best results. I, for one, would like to see a lot more Cab Franc planted and used in this country.... I'm not a big fan of cab/shiraz blending - hard for me to really articulate why. But doing wacky things can have very pleasing results. I had a pinot/shiraz blend from the Bellarine region that was a perfectly harmonious and successful blend. I reckon we could see more of that (I'd rather aromatics and mouthfeel from a small percentage of pinot than viognier)......


I guess I'm on the other side of the fence - I think cab / shiraz (or vice versa) blends are the wines Oz does the best. The structure of cabernet is a great starting point, and the lushness of shiraz fills any mid-palate weakness..... I absolutely love the Yalumba blends (Sig and The Reserve) and pre-97 Bin 389, as well as St Henri when it was blend. These wines are only just hitting their stride at 20 years of age...

User avatar
griff
Posts: 1906
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by griff »

Mike Hawkins wrote:
kaos wrote:I thought it was roundly agreed that Cabernet Sauvignon SHOULD be blended for best results. I, for one, would like to see a lot more Cab Franc planted and used in this country.... I'm not a big fan of cab/shiraz blending - hard for me to really articulate why. But doing wacky things can have very pleasing results. I had a pinot/shiraz blend from the Bellarine region that was a perfectly harmonious and successful blend. I reckon we could see more of that (I'd rather aromatics and mouthfeel from a small percentage of pinot than viognier)......


I guess I'm on the other side of the fence - I think cab / shiraz (or vice versa) blends are the wines Oz does the best. The structure of cabernet is a great starting point, and the lushness of shiraz fills any mid-palate weakness..... I absolutely love the Yalumba blends (Sig and The Reserve) and pre-97 Bin 389, as well as St Henri when it was blend. These wines are only just hitting their stride at 20 years of age...


Hear, hear. A 1974 Wolf Blass Black Label tasted in May has made me think of the blend in a different light. It certainly can age!

cheers

Carl
Bartenders are supposed to have people skills. Or was it people are supposed to have bartending skills?

Mahmoud Ali
Posts: 2960
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:00 pm
Location: Edmonton, Canada

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by Mahmoud Ali »

Mike Hawkins wrote:I guess I'm on the other side of the fence - I think cab / shiraz (or vice versa) blends are the wines Oz does the best. The structure of cabernet is a great starting point, and the lushness of shiraz fills any mid-palate weakness..... I absolutely love the Yalumba blends (Sig and The Reserve) and pre-97 Bin 389, as well as St Henri when it was blend. These wines are only just hitting their stride at 20 years of age...


I agree wholeheartedly. More producers should use their best wines to go into the blends. I think Penfolds showed the way with some of their early Koonunga Hills and, of course, the Bin 389s. Mike, I did not know that the St Henri was at one time a blend.

Mahmoud.

User avatar
rens
Posts: 1425
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by rens »

Mahmoud Ali wrote:
Mike Hawkins wrote:I guess I'm on the other side of the fence - I think cab / shiraz (or vice versa) blends are the wines Oz does the best. The structure of cabernet is a great starting point, and the lushness of shiraz fills any mid-palate weakness..... I absolutely love the Yalumba blends (Sig and The Reserve) and pre-97 Bin 389, as well as St Henri when it was blend. These wines are only just hitting their stride at 20 years of age...


I agree wholeheartedly. More producers should use their best wines to go into the blends. I think Penfolds showed the way with some of their early Koonunga Hills and, of course, the Bin 389s. Mike, I did not know that the St Henri was at one time a blend.

Mahmoud.



Even Grange is a blend by definition. A splash of Cabernet in every bottle.
never underestimate the predictability of stupidity

Milan
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 12:56 pm
Location: Sydney CBD

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by Milan »

Most consumers in Australia still hold their nose up at Aussie blends...yet will happily drink a Bordeaux! Go figure!

User avatar
odyssey
Posts: 658
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:06 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by odyssey »

Milan wrote:Most consumers in Australia still hold their nose up at Aussie blends...yet will happily drink a Bordeaux! Go figure!


I don't know about you, but I don't know a lot of Aussie straight-variety consumers who drink Bordeaux. As soon as you bring out a bottle with a foreign word on it they suddenly start sounding like Darryl Kerrigan from The Castle "what do you call this?!".

The ones I know who appreciate a foreign wine have no problem drinking a cab-blend or GSM. And the ones I know who enjoy a good Bordeaux love Lake's Folly and Mt Mary.

User avatar
rens
Posts: 1425
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by rens »

odyssey wrote:
Milan wrote:Most consumers in Australia still hold their nose up at Aussie blends...yet will happily drink a Bordeaux! Go figure!


I don't know about you, but I don't know a lot of Aussie straight-variety consumers who drink Bordeaux. As soon as you bring out a bottle with a foreign word on it they suddenly start sounding like Darryl Kerrigan from The Castle "what do you call this?!".

The ones I know who appreciate a foreign wine have no problem drinking a cab-blend or GSM. And the ones I know who enjoy a good Bordeaux love Lake's Folly and Mt Mary.


Blends are probably not that popular with many, but I think that is to our advantage. Imagine if everyone found out about Teusner Avatar or some of the Bordeaux blends comming from Margaret River. Those of us that love them would be paying a premium. I'm glad not many people go for these.
never underestimate the predictability of stupidity

paulf
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:31 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Blends vs Varietal

Post by paulf »

You just have to look at France, Spain, Portugal and Italy for examples of high end blending.
Having been in Portugal recently, I got to taste quite a range of table wines from various producers and in all cases the top wine of each of these producers was a blend. All of them had varietal wines, usually Touriga Nacional, but I also saw Tinta Roriz (aka Tempranillo) and even a couple of examples of Sousau, but the blend was always better. Quinta do Crasto Vinha Maria Teresa, which is a field blend, is probably the best wine I have ever tasted. Also, to my knowledge there is only one Vintage Port on the market that is not a blend (Maghalaes).

I'd add Castagna Un Segreto (Shiraz/Sangiovese) to the list of top class Australian blends.

Post Reply