Penfolds 407 1997-2002

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
graham
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 8:24 pm
Location: Brisbane

Penfolds 407 1997-2002

Post by graham »

Retired all my 407 ( 97-2002) to the drinking rack last month. Not surprisingly the 00 and 01's had fallen apart, not a lot of fruit and a little stale. Opened a 97 last night with a wagu steak, what a nice surprise :P
Lots of fruit still (blackcurrent) and mint on the back palate, tannins still firm and a touch of oak. Yet to hit the 98's and 02's hope they aren't dead.

Only problem with stashing wine away year after year is when you realise that you have let a number sit in the racks unnoticed for too long. Other retirees in the rack to be hit in the near future:
Tahbilk Shiraz 99-02
Craiglee Shiraz 00-02
389 96-04, not touching the St Henri :D
Clonakilla hilltops 00-02
All my Rosemount Balmoral ( I'll get burnt here)

Lesson? Take greater note of my spreadsheet and drink windows!

Graham
Nothing is so effective in keeping one young and full of lust as a discriminating palate thoroughly satisfied at least once a day.

AndrewCowley
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 9:52 pm

Re: Penfolds 407 1997-2002

Post by AndrewCowley »

I had an 04 Bin 389 recently. Was really good. Still has plenty of life, so no need for you to rush.

burges
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 9:44 am

Re: Penfolds 407 1997-2002

Post by burges »

I had the Rosemount Balmoral ’98 recently. It was drinking well and should be good for a few more years.

Mahmoud Ali
Posts: 2954
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:00 pm
Location: Edmonton, Canada

Re: Penfolds 407 1997-2002

Post by Mahmoud Ali »

I would have thought that all the wines on your list would be on the younger side. They may be drinking well but should have plenty of life yet.

Cheers........................Mahmoud.

graham
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 8:24 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Penfolds 407 1997-2002

Post by graham »

Mahmoud
My thoughts as well but the wine gods proved fickle ; many wines have proved to be very hit and miss. As I like to say, some are like an angel pissing down your throat( I tend to get in a bit on trouble with this wine description) while other make me wonder why I purchased them in the first place.
I am pleased to say however my vat 1,47 and 9's rarely let me down as do my Yara Yering, Clonakilla, Lakes Folly, Cullen and Rockford.
But at the end of the day that's half the excitement :D
Graham
Nothing is so effective in keeping one young and full of lust as a discriminating palate thoroughly satisfied at least once a day.

User avatar
cuttlefish
Posts: 1014
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 1:46 pm
Location: Sunbury

Re: Penfolds 407 1997-2002

Post by cuttlefish »

graham wrote:Retired all my 407 ( 97-2002) to the drinking rack last month. Not surprisingly the 00 and 01's had fallen apart, not a lot of fruit and a little stale. Opened a 97 last night with a wagu steak, what a nice surprise :P
Lots of fruit still (blackcurrent) and mint on the back palate, tannins still firm and a touch of oak. Yet to hit the 98's and 02's hope they aren't dead.

Only problem with stashing wine away year after year is when you realise that you have let a number sit in the racks unnoticed for too long. Other retirees in the rack to be hit in the near future:
Tahbilk Shiraz 99-02
Craiglee Shiraz 00-02
389 96-04, not touching the St Henri :D
Clonakilla hilltops 00-02
All my Rosemount Balmoral ( I'll get burnt here)

Lesson? Take greater note of my spreadsheet and drink windows!

Graham


I disagree about the 01 407's having fallen over. That has to have been a bottle that wasn't quite right for some reason. I had that wine in the last 6 months or so, and it seemed ok to me.
Smack my [insert grape type here] up !

George Krashos
Posts: 474
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 7:26 pm

Re: Penfolds 407 1997-2002

Post by George Krashos »

Yep, I had the 01 Bin 407 on Friday night and it was singing. Left the 01 Bremerton Old Adam Shiraz for dead.

-- George Krashos

graham
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 8:24 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Penfolds 407 1997-2002

Post by graham »

I'll try another 01 407 this week. Bottle variation? Hopefully :lol:
Although up until 6 years ago I had all my wines stored off site in professional storage facility, after the 3 rd weekend in a row of seeing the temp at 18.4 I decided to build my own cellar . Here is hoping that's not the problem :|
Graham
Nothing is so effective in keeping one young and full of lust as a discriminating palate thoroughly satisfied at least once a day.

Mike Hawkins
Posts: 2747
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am

Re: Penfolds 407 1997-2002

Post by Mike Hawkins »

I really wanted to like 407, but other than the first two releases, i just dont think they reach the expected heights. For that matter, i feel the same about Cullen (now diane madeleine). All of them went to auction.......

Broughy
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Hobart

Re: Penfolds 407 1997-2002

Post by Broughy »

389 96 onwards all fine and will go further although some in their window now for drinking. 407 had some odd results that i am now putting down to bottle variation

fred
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:35 pm

Re: Penfolds 407 1997-2002

Post by fred »

Always disappointed by bin 407 - yes even those first 2 vintages 1990 & 1991.

The 2000 & 2002 Craiglee shiraz are both in great form and no hurry to knock them off (despite the conservative drinking window on the label the good vintages improve for more than the specified 7-8 years and both 00 & 02 are excellent for Craiglee). BTW the 2000 needs a big decant...

389s are not really ready on any scale (except possibly forward cellaring conditions) albeit 1996 is always going to be supreb (best 389 since 71) and the 98 is a monster...

Balmoral generally makes 407 look good IMHO - and even better as vfm, so just not my preference but YMMV

Agree that you want to knock off the hilltops about now and they should be fine...

regards

Post Reply