1982 Chateau Pontensac + 2002 Evasham Wood Cuvee J Pinot

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
Gianna
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: The world's most liveable city - Melbourne

1982 Chateau Pontensac + 2002 Evasham Wood Cuvee J Pinot

Post by Gianna »

1982 Chateau Pontensac - Bourdeaux

Picked this up cheaply at auction recently and was looking forward to drinking. So given Sat night in Melb was the first coldie for 8 months, I chopped some wood for the fire and opened the bottle up early.

The cork crumbled to pieces and was hard to get out. Totally stained.
The nose was pungent. Blah I thought, and about as bad as a wine could smell without forcing you to tip it down the sink. One hour later....the same. 2 hours later....the same, but I knew it would come good.

Decanted for about 3 hours and when it finally blew off all the bottle stink and had time to breath, this was a beautiful wine.

Reminicent of the best Cab / Shiraz blends that we have in Australia.
Perhaps what the 1996 Bin 389 will taste like in 10 years.

Very smooth and silky presence on the tongue. Glided down effortlessly.

Very leathery, charcoal, cedar and smoked bacon flavours. Yet it still retained a core of red berry fruits. This wine delivered on all fronts.

Great structure with a excellent balance between savoury and mature fruit. It seemed to continually change throughout the night and evolve.

Perhaps not in the league of other high end Bourdeaux, but an extremely enjoyable wine. 92 Pts

2002 Evasham Wood Cuvee J - Pinot Noir

4th bottle from of a 1/2 case.
Perfumed nose of berries, plums, sweet strawberries, confectionary, in fact almost musky lollies. But in no way sickly.

A little thin and lacking in overall complexity. The palate was a little spicy, with hints of cloves and pepper and dark plums.

As noted in my previous TN, the 99 Bannockburn Serre was easily the best Pinot that I have had in a long time and although this was good, it was no match at all. But still good. 90 Pts


As my next post is my 100th , I will try and select a wine to drink that will inspire even the most seasoned of forumites. So it is deep, deep, deep into the cellar I go..... :wink:
Last edited by Gianna on Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
At every turn, it pays to challenge orthodox ways of thinking

wine bloke
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by wine bloke »

Don't you love picking up something at auction that is interesting and cost you all of your back pocket.

Good tasting notes once again on the Pontensac. I agree that it would compare to a '96 389 or even a '91, but have you tried current vintage 389? My thoughts were that it was very one dimensional, with very little underlying primary fruit. Even from a tough vintage I expected more complexity from Penfold's/Foster's.

Cheers, Wine Bloke.
wine woman & song all night long! If it get's too much give up the singing!

Gary W
Posts: 993
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 10:41 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by Gary W »

Potensac are usually light bodied on release and build up a bit with bottle age (in my experience) where as 389 is usually pretty powerful straight off. The current release 389 is 2004.....top wine.

Bordeaux.

GW

Mahmoud Ali
Posts: 2960
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:00 pm
Location: Edmonton, Canada

Post by Mahmoud Ali »

GW wrote; "Potensac are usually light bodied on release and build up a bit with bottle age (in my experience) where as 389 is usually pretty powerful straight off."

I hadn't thought of it but what you say rings true. When a friend and I were dividing our case and a half of 1989 Potensac we decided to try a bottle right away. We were quite disappointed at the time, thinking the wine was light-bodied and a bit characterless. Years later when I finally opened a bottle I found that it had filled out considerably and was an excellent drop. And it still had years ahead of it.

As for the 389, the only one I have had young was the 1998 and it was powerful, concentrated, rigidly built, but closed. A real keeper. I have not had a chance to try the current release.

Cheers..............Mahmoud

Post Reply