Page 1 of 2
wine cliches: the favourite and hated
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:18 pm
by Scanlon
For me - it's time to give the phrase 'punches above its weight' a rest.
definitely suffering from overexposure.
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:26 pm
by malliemcg
anything but Chardonnay
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:30 pm
by jeremy
Scanlon says
For me - it's time to give the phrase 'punches above its weight' a rest
Ouch!!! I used that one this week
Hate "finish like a peacock's tail" meself
cheers
jeremy
ps- struggling to find the appropriate usage of the descriptor "interesting". Think it has it's place, but also overused (once again I'm a culprit)
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:44 pm
by ross67
Probably more descriptors then cliches/phrases:
It all gets very complicated....
dark fruit.....dark red fruit.... rich dark fruit.... red fruit.....round red......smooth fruit......smooth sweet fruit.......ripe fruit......cherry fruit......sour cherry fruit.....rich cherry.........
and so on..........................
ross
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:55 pm
by Rawshack
'Slurpable' - been creeping into more reviews I've been reading recently. User should be publically flogged and forced to drink Yellowtail chardonnay for three years
'Lip smacking' - see above. Ralph Kyte-Powell, you are a repeat offender and you may want to seek legal advice
'ABC'. Fck me with a kipper, it's like being back into the 90's when people say this
'I'll have a Sav Blanc' - try something else, you might like it. Then again you might not. Either way, you're financing an evil Kiwi Terrorist cell and your children are at risk by drinking that filth
'Seamlessly' - Please.
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:07 am
by GraemeG
ross67 wrote:Probably more descriptors then cliches/phrases:
It all gets very complicated....
dark fruit.....dark red fruit.... rich dark fruit.... red fruit.....round red......smooth fruit......smooth sweet fruit.......ripe fruit......cherry fruit......sour cherry fruit.....rich cherry.........
and so on..........................
ross
I kind of know what you mean, and yet... shopping lists of specific fruits always seem a bit tedious to me. I very much identified with Len Evans when he spoke on this subject in his posthumous memoir. "An old Hunter tastes like an old Hunter" he said, and more or less argued that if you haven't tasted one, no number of words or fruit descriptors will convey the experience. Sometimes, I just figure that 'dark/black fruit' is a shorthand way of saying 'appropriately varietal cabernet flavours', with red berries/spice doing for shiraz and cherries for pinot. A bit simple I know, but an effective shorthand anyway.
The terms I try to avoid (not always successfully) are the ones that lose context withour further elaboration; just saying 'complex' for instance, is almost meaningless without a bit more data.
cheers,
Graeme
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:01 am
by Scanlon
[quote="Rawshack"]
'ABC'. Fck me with a kipper, it's like being back into the 90's when people say this
[quote]
At the risk of sounding naive do you mean this in some sort of wine situation, or as in 'easy as ABC'?
ps great imagery with the kipper
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:11 am
by jeremy
GraemeG
Inbetween you and Ross here. Think there is a place for both general fruit and specific fruit descriptors dependent on what the wine gives you.
As for the term "complex", overused maybe but no problems with it myself. To me, simply means that there are a lot of different facets to the wine, that is, it is far from a one song wine.
Cheers
jeremy
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:13 am
by Craig(NZ)
try something else, you might like it. Then again you might not. Either way, you're financing an evil Kiwi Terrorist cell and your children are at risk by drinking that filth
oh god here we go with the "im too sophisticated to touch sauvignon blanc" twaddle
there's one in every crowd
if i wanna drink yqeum, i will drink yquem no matter what you think of the grape that goes into it
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:18 am
by jeremy
Life is too short to squabble over any one grapes merits other than in jest or light heartedness. Didn't think there was enough in the post to warrant the "im too sophisticated..." remark. OK running for cover now, not looking for a fight, its monday.
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:14 am
by ufo
Calling Sav. Blanc "Cat's piss"
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:17 pm
by Craig(NZ)
Life is too short to squabble over any one grapes merits other than in jest or light heartedness.
i dunno about that, im still reasonably young
Trolls like the ones you see often about sauvignon blanc just highlight the fact (more often than not) that the poor fool has tried a few labels which they didnt like and moved on. Generalising a bit here but hey, to me it doesnt show sophistication at all it shows ignorance and dismissiveness.
Ive tried more than a few sauvignon blancs i dont like. In fact ive tried truckloads of rubbish (just as ive tried truckloads of rubbish shiraz). However that doesnt mean there a no great ones about in either regard. Ive tried some sensational Sauvignon Blanc over the years which would hold their own in the company of any other white wine variety.
Those that order Sauvignon Blanc at the bar are usually hot females anyway so long may it continue!
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:21 pm
by winetastic
ufo wrote:Calling Sav. Blanc "Cat's piss"
I assume this is a suggestion as your favorite cliche?
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:45 pm
by ufo
winetastic wrote:ufo wrote:Calling Sav. Blanc "Cat's piss"
I assume this is a suggestion as your favorite cliche?
No, totally the opposite.
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:51 pm
by Rawshack
Craig(NZ) wrote:try something else, you might like it. Then again you might not. Either way, you're financing an evil Kiwi Terrorist cell and your children are at risk by drinking that filth
oh god here we go with the "im too sophisticated to touch sauvignon blanc" twaddle
there's one in every crowd
if i wanna drink yqeum, i will drink yquem no matter what you think of the grape that goes into it
Craig craig craig. Take a deep breath, it's all OK. I know we may have crossed swords before on this subject, but surely even people from New Zealand can appreciate (admittedly a poor attempt at) humour....
Sorry, I was just fushing.
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:59 pm
by winetastic
ufo wrote:winetastic wrote:ufo wrote:Calling Sav. Blanc "Cat's piss"
I assume this is a suggestion as your favorite cliche?
No, totally the opposite.
I realised this... should have picked an emoticon with a more ironic expression?
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:29 pm
by orpheus
I hate "a very smart wine".
I have found very few that I could have a good conversation with, though they are good listeners, and certainly capable of improving conversation (or at least create the perception of a better conversation).
I have no problem with the "berry fruit" or "dark berry fruit" descriptors; after all, it is very difficult to describe most Australian shiraz or cabernet without them!
Much wisdom in the Len Evans remark.
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:41 pm
by ufo
winetastic wrote:ufo wrote:winetastic wrote:ufo wrote:Calling Sav. Blanc "Cat's piss"
I assume this is a suggestion as your favorite cliche?
No, totally the opposite.
I realised this... should have picked an emoticon with a more ironic expression?
you should have !
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:03 pm
by Rawshack
orpheus wrote:I hate "a very smart wine".
Good shout - a most annoying phrase.
'Ripper of a wine' is another one.
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:53 pm
by jeremy
Craig
Those that order Sauvignon Blanc at the bar are usually hot females anyway so long may it continue!
Best argument for SB of the day
and so true...
I've said it on other forums but I liked the lees action on the Teusner 2008 Woodside SB from the Adelaide Hills. Then again I haven't met a Teusner I didn't get along with.
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:29 pm
by TORB
orpheus wrote:I hate "a very smart wine".
It also means:
dashingly or impressively neat or trim in appearance, as persons, dress, etc.
socially elegant; sophisticated or fashionable: the smart crowd.
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:51 pm
by orpheus
TORB wrote:orpheus wrote:I hate "a very smart wine".
It also means:
dashingly or impressively neat or trim in appearance, as persons, dress, etc.
socially elegant; sophisticated or fashionable: the smart crowd.
I could not accuse a writer of tasting notes of resorting to a cliche were they to describe a wine in any of these terms.
I would like to taste a "socially elegant" wine, and also a wine that is dashingly neat in appearance.
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:28 pm
by dkw
...and certainly capable of improving conversation (or at least create the perception of a better conversation). ...
If you'd been the sober judge as I was, hearing an unfortunately very loud drunken 3am to 4am conversation between our neighbours last Friday night, you might agree that 'perception' is the key word...
Mind you, they were drinking beer, not wine.
Dave
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:01 pm
by Michael McNally
Scanlon wrote:Rawshack wrote:'ABC'. Fck me with a kipper, it's like being back into the 90's when people say this
At the risk of sounding naive do you mean this in some sort of wine situation, or as in 'easy as ABC'?
ps great imagery with the kipper
ABC = Anything But Chardonnay. I dislike it too. Good chardy to be had if you look for it.
I'm happier with generic "dark black fruits" then trying to emphasise a particular fruit or fruits for the sake of it. It means the same to me as saying "dark plum, cherry and blackberry".
I think almost anything anyone uses to try to describe the bouquet, flavours and structure rather than the wine overall is fine, though some of the more obtuse ones like "nose of pigeon feathers and kibbled rye" get to me a bit. Redundant phrases like "goes down easy", as well as being grammatically sloppy, do annoy me a tad.
My 3c
Michael
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:12 pm
by TORB
orpheus wrote:
I could not accuse a writer of tasting notes of resorting to a cliche were they to describe a wine in any of these terms.
I would like to taste a "socially elegant" wine, and also a wine that is dashingly neat in appearance.
"Socially elegant" wines are those consumed by two groups of people.
1. The oh so social set.
2. Wine wankers that reckon they very sophisticated and drinking "the in thing" - low alcohol, low oak, low preservatives, yet highly priced enough so that it does not appeal to the riff raff!
And if its French, so much the better!
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 7:34 am
by ufo
TORB wrote:orpheus wrote:
I could not accuse a writer of tasting notes of resorting to a cliche were they to describe a wine in any of these terms.
I would like to taste a "socially elegant" wine, and also a wine that is dashingly neat in appearance.
"Socially elegant" wines are those consumed by two groups of people.
1. The oh so social set.
2. Wine wankers that reckon they very sophisticated and drinking "the in thing" - low alcohol, low oak, low preservatives, yet highly priced enough so that it does not appeal to the riff raff!
And if its French, so much the better!
spot on Rick
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:17 am
by orpheus
TORB wrote:orpheus wrote:
I could not accuse a writer of tasting notes of resorting to a cliche were they to describe a wine in any of these terms.
I would like to taste a "socially elegant" wine, and also a wine that is dashingly neat in appearance.
"Socially elegant" wines are those consumed by two groups of people.
1. The oh so social set.
2. Wine wankers that reckon they very sophisticated and drinking "the in thing" - low alcohol, low oak, low preservatives, yet highly priced enough so that it does not appeal to the riff raff!
And if its French, so much the better!
But Rick, have you encountered a dashingly neat wine?
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:55 pm
by TORB
orpheus wrote:But Rick, have you encountered a dashingly neat wine?
Absoludle..... its a wine that does not spill a drop when it is extracted from a barrel via a pipette, and is then transferred to a tasting glass, also without any spillage or leakage.
Extra points are awarded if it spells well too.
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:21 am
by David
What gets on my goat are descriptions of flavours in wine that i am sure no-one has ever tasted. Coal tar comes to mind. '
Could it be that wine writers who use these types of descriptions use them to place themselves far above the ordinary people to whom wine tastes like wine? I can see theses flavours therefore i'm an expert.
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:47 am
by orpheus
David wrote:What gets on my goat are descriptions of flavours in wine that i am sure no-one has ever tasted. Coal tar comes to mind. '
Could it be that wine writers who use these types of descriptions use them to place themselves far above the ordinary people to whom wine tastes like wine? I can see theses flavours therefore i'm an expert.
Yes. Sometimes, I think they are talking about what the smell of something would taste like, if that convoluted concept means anything to anybody else. For instance "the taste of a hot bitumen road", which I sometimes sense in a good, honest, McLaren Vale cabernet or shiraz.