TN: 1999 Grange v 1999 Hill of Grace
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:01 pm
The winner is HoG - by a long way.
1999 Grange: Disapointing to be honest. A tired wine out of balance. The nose was dominated by oak, the black fruits struggling to make an appearance, no lifted notes. The palate lacked concentration, the acid had faded, leaving a flabby wine. The saving grace was the exquisite fine grained tannins. Perhaps a dodgy bottle - although no TCA detected.
1999 HoG: An exceptional wine. Great Balance. Still youthful. At the bigger end of medium bodied. Reminiscient of great Bordeaux. The nose was lifted, fruit driven, very complex, oak in balance. The palate was intense, complex, supported by the finest of powdery tannins.
This was my first Hill of Grace. I am interested to know if anyone else prefers HoG to Grange - in general.
Cheers,
Stuart
1999 Grange: Disapointing to be honest. A tired wine out of balance. The nose was dominated by oak, the black fruits struggling to make an appearance, no lifted notes. The palate lacked concentration, the acid had faded, leaving a flabby wine. The saving grace was the exquisite fine grained tannins. Perhaps a dodgy bottle - although no TCA detected.
1999 HoG: An exceptional wine. Great Balance. Still youthful. At the bigger end of medium bodied. Reminiscient of great Bordeaux. The nose was lifted, fruit driven, very complex, oak in balance. The palate was intense, complex, supported by the finest of powdery tannins.
This was my first Hill of Grace. I am interested to know if anyone else prefers HoG to Grange - in general.
Cheers,
Stuart