Page 1 of 1
Pirathon Shiraz 2005 question
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:55 pm
by drlev
Hi, all.
I have a question which some of you may be able to shed some light on and settle an argument.
I have just tasted a bottle of 2005 Kalleske Pirathon Shiraz (or to be correct Pirathon by Kalleske) and my tastebuds tell me there is a hint of grenache in there. It is not mentioned on the label or in any info from the winery.
Has anyone else tried this and do you taste granche or am I just hallucinating (again)?
Cheers, Lev
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:35 am
by TORB
Lev,
Under Oz law there can be 14.9% Grenache in there and it does not have to be on the label, so it is perfectly possible. Many winemakers fiddle with a small percentage of something, often its the addition of the current vintage to freshen up the wine, to name just one example.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 5:08 am
by Craig(NZ)
not sure about that, but its a pretty tidy wine thats for sure!
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:33 am
by Bick
Yep, super wine.
With regard to Grenache - it could have some of course, but my guess would be that its pure shiraz. The bumpf on the Pirathon website goes into some detail about the wine making process, and doesn't mention any post-fermentation blending, whereas to make their Clarry's Grenache-Shiraz blend, the blending takes place after fermentation. Just a hunch... but I couldn't tell you from taste alone - its so tasty I could easily believe there were all sorts of things in there. If you find out for sure, let us know!
[Incidentally, I had the 05 Clarry's recently - very nice though I was more impressed by the Pirathon]
Re: Pirathon Shiraz 2005 question
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:29 am
by Red Bigot
drlev wrote:
Has anyone else tried this and do you taste granche or am I just hallucinating (again)?
Cheers, Lev
Lev, I have it on good authority that there are indeed two rogue grenache vines in the vinyard from which Pirathon is made. You should take out insurance on your palate.
And if you fell for that I have a thousand cases of a $5 cleanskin red that is better than Grange, as determined by a panel of VB drinkers at the Oxford Arms hotel.
Seriously though, I have no idea if there is or not, but when I tried it I thought the partial red fruit spectrum flavours were just part of the beautiful sweet-shiraz-fruit package of this wine.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:46 am
by Wayno
Yessir, a top little package in a nice little package. And well priced to boot.
Re: Pirathon Shiraz 2005 question
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:08 pm
by beef
drlev wrote:Hi, all.
I have a question which some of you may be able to shed some light on and settle an argument.
I have just tasted a bottle of 2005 Kalleske Pirathon Shiraz (or to be correct Pirathon by Kalleske) and my tastebuds tell me there is a hint of grenache in there. It is not mentioned on the label or in any info from the winery.
Has anyone else tried this and do you taste granche or am I just hallucinating (again)?
Cheers, Lev
** This sort of thing certainly happens. The Woodcutter's Shiraz from Torbreck, for example, is obviously an S/V blend. But it's not mentioned on the label.
Stuart
Re: Pirathon Shiraz 2005 question
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:29 pm
by Gary W
beef wrote:drlev wrote:Hi, all.
** This sort of thing certainly happens. The Woodcutter's Shiraz from Torbreck, for example, is obviously an S/V blend. But it's not mentioned on the label.
Stuart
No so sure of that. Often Barossa shiraz can taste juicy and apricotty without the viognier.
GW
Re: Pirathon Shiraz 2005 question
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:43 pm
by beef
Gary W wrote:beef wrote:drlev wrote:Hi, all.
** This sort of thing certainly happens. The Woodcutter's Shiraz from Torbreck, for example, is obviously an S/V blend. But it's not mentioned on the label.
Stuart
No so sure of that. Often Barossa shiraz can taste juicy and apricotty without the viognier.
GW
** I've never tasted another "straight" Shiraz with such overt Viognier characteristics. Care to name one?
Stuart
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:57 pm
by Gary W
Many of those fruity low oak early drink styles. Teusner Riebke is one.
Rutherglen Estates Shiraz another. Loose End Barossa Shiraz...and the Torbreck wines that don't have Viognier declared certainly have that juicy stonefruit quality. It is a known attribute (amongst certain tasters) of Barossa. Even Langi in certain vintages shows it (1999 when young).
GW
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 5:04 pm
by Red Bigot
Gary W wrote:Rutherglen Estates Shiraz another.
Funny you should mention that one, the 2006 vintage of this won a silver in the NWS Cl 13, which is a Shiraz-Viognier class, for entry it must have 1% or more Viognier.
Edit: Only 5 more to overtake TORB now.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c33a3/c33a39f552ca3f92ef4865fec73ce2a7be0da67c" alt="Smile :-)"
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 5:17 pm
by Gary W
Hmm. Yes I think I remember them saying the RE may have some V. in it..
Torbreck state that there is no Viognier in Woodcutters. I asked them about it of the 2005 vintage.
"No Viognier. We don’t have much (only in the Descendant vineyard) and it get’s used in Descendant and RunRig."
GW
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:22 pm
by beef
I'll try the Teusner Riebke over the weekend, and post my thoughts.
Stuart
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:52 pm
by griff
The Torbreck Factor tasted more apricot than the Descendant at Wine Australia last year. They swore blind that it hadn't any apricot in it. That was my experience.
cheers
Carl
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:53 pm
by beef
griff wrote:The Torbreck Factor tasted more apricot than the Descendant at Wine Australia last year. They swore blind that it hadn't any apricot in it. That was my experience.
cheers
Carl
** Maybe they use old S/V barrels. I know sod-all about wine-making and the various factors which influence the final product. But it seems feasible.
Stuart
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:07 am
by Gary W
There would not be any (significant) flavour carry through the barrels I would guess...being as they would be high pressure washed and scrubbed before use on a new wine. I think the answer may lie (apart from the fruit) more in the yeasts and type of ferment to build aromatics - but could be totally wrong.
GW
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 8:29 pm
by drlev
Thank you, all - what a nice bunch (pun intended) of people hang out on this forum!
Brian, at $5 and better than Grange, I'd better take your offer!
And Carl, I have to ask: what are snozzberries?
Cheers, Lev
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 9:58 pm
by griff
drlev wrote:Thank you, all - what a nice bunch (pun intended) of people hang out on this forum!
Brian, at $5 and better than Grange, I'd better take your offer!
And Carl, I have to ask: what are snozzberries?
Cheers, Lev
A quote from Gene Wilder in Willy Wonka. Reminded me of a tasting note
cheers
Carl
Pirathon
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:45 pm
by Leigh
Tasted a bottle tonight. I am sure that it has a small % of viognier in the mix.
Cheers
Leigh
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:34 pm
by drlev
For all who contributed, here is the definitive answer from the source:
Good Morning Lev,
Thanks for your query….
100% Shiraz!
Sorry to say there is no Grenache or any other varieties in here for that matter. However the different flavours and complexity is derived from the grapes which come from 9 x growers / vineyards in the north-west Barossa and then various types of oak from a range of coopers is used.
Hope this clears things up for you and enjoy.
With Warm Regards,
Tony
Tony Kalleske
Kalleske Wines Pty Ltd
Pirathon Wines Pty Ltd
PO Box 650 Greenock
South Australia 5360
T: 0403 811 433 F: 08 8562 8118
www.kalleske.com
www.pirathon.com
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:50 pm
by seanwines
I tried this wine, it was ok