Page 1 of 1

TN: New Petaluma releases

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:36 pm
by GraemeG
Tasted at the release thingy on Sept 1st.

2007 Petaluma Riesling (Clare Valley) [screwcap, A$20]
The palest of lemon yellow colours; the nose is a mix of late harvest Riesling floral notes with almost a whif of gewürztraminer – emphatically not the lemon/lime notes you often find in Clare Riesling. Initially very soft and cuddly on the palate; the acidity, although steely, makes a very late appearance on the palate. An interesting non-mainstream style, but I’d suggest drinking within a few years. …

2006 Petaluma Viognier (Mt Barker SA) [screwcap, 14.5%, A$35]
Mid lemon. Rich, ripe nose, less of apricot than of rich stone fruits with a mineral tinge. Little oak is evident here. The palate is nicely balanced, and the wine has a decent length finish, with enough acidity to keep it clean, and the alcohol in check – it certainly didn’t taste warm. Enjoyable wine, and outside the mainstream of Australian viognier, which is probably a good thing.

2005 Petaluma Chardonnay (Adelaide Hills) [cork, A$35]
Mid lemon. Creamy French oak on the nose, with figs & nuts, ripe white fruits. This was served very cold, and I found the palate a bit muted; there’s decent weight to the mid-palate, but the finish wasn’t all that long. Good but anonymous.

2005 Petaluma Shiraz (Mt Barker SA) [screwcap, 14.5%, A$35]
Ruby/purple. Not just co-fermented, but co-crushed (?) with a touch of viognier. It’s not hugely obvious on the palate, but does seem to give the nose a little lift. Light fresh spicy notes, seemingly minimal oak, this fresh chewy shiraz is only medium-bodied at best and seems to lack depth and focus. Drink now or keep a few years. Nice enough but overpriced.

2004 Petaluma Coonwarra Cabernet Merlot [cork, A$40]
Ruby/garnet. Lovely nose of ripe cabernet (65% of the blend), missing the hard green touch present in the 2002. Still new-world-fruity, but there’s some restraint and sophistication here. Lovely palate, with the ripe fruit coating all parts of the tongue, and the ultra-fine powdery tannins remain in subtle support. A class act.

2004 Petaluma Merlot (Coonawarra) [cork, A$40]
They persist with this – I don’t know why. Deep ruby. A sort-of varietal nose, in a new-world way, plummy, coconut, red fruits. Tidy oak. The palate is big; solidly chalky grape tannins dominate – you might think it’s a brooding monster, likely to bloom over many years’ aging. Apart from one bottle of 1990, that’s not been my (admittedly limited) experience with this label. I find the finish harsh, and one-dimensional. But if this merlot is your cup of tea, I’m sure this vintage will be a high point.

Apparently those wnes still remaining in cork will switch over to screwcap with the 2005 vintage. Didn't see any Tiers for tasting, didn't think to ask!
cheers,
Graeme

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:50 am
by Wayno
Agreed, the 04 Coonawarra is a great wine and will develop very well over time. One of the better examples of this label, from my experience.

I have always thought the Viognier a bit pricey for what it is. Having tried a couple of vintages of this, I have never been overly impressed with it, for the dollars asked.

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:24 am
by Von Ridler
Purchased some of the 2004 Petaluma Coonawarra, very nice wine.
I have all vintages back to 1995 excluding 2003.
Never seen a 2003 Petaluma Coonawarra, was one released?

Regards,
Ron.

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 7:59 am
by Gary W
Von Ridler wrote:Never seen a 2003 Petaluma Coonawarra, was one released?

Regards,
Ron.


It will be released after the 2004. Small quantities too.
GW

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:15 am
by Jordan
Had a bottle of the 2007 Riesling last night. Excellent wine.

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:07 pm
by JamieBahrain
I hated the 06 Petaluma riesling. It was bizarre for my tastes.

Are the 06 & 07 similar?

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:45 pm
by Nayan
JamieBahrain wrote:I hated the 06 Petaluma riesling. It was bizarre for my tastes.

Are the 06 & 07 similar?

Haven't had the 07 since the tank samples I tried, but then it was looking very similar to the 02. Agree with you on the 06.

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:51 am
by Jordan
Much better than the 2006 from memory.