Page 1 of 1

Guess the Wine - wk begin 5/6

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:10 pm
by Andrew Jordan
Ok ... this is getting harder than I thought. :?

But let's try once more. If you guys (Maximus) can Google this then I give up!

This weeks wine (part II), and hopefully Google proof:

TASTING NOTE 1
"Deep purple-red ... lusciously ripe and powerful black fruits/blackberry/blackcurrant fruit ... powerful lingering tannins ... oak absorbed".

TASTING NOTE 2
" ... heavyweight, tannic ... luscious flesh of black, intense, mulberry ... the smoky swirl of oak ... drenched in sweet rich chocolate ... minted blackcurrant, and the bright lift of red ripe plums. It’s a strong, tannic, concentrated beast, and in its style it’s a terrific drop.".


I have provided a few options in a couple of the categories.

Country - Australia
State - Vic/Nsw/Sa
Region - :roll:
Varietial - Shiraz/Cabernet/Cabernet-Shiraz
Year - 1998/2000/2002
Winery - :roll:
Name of Wine - :roll:

Have fun. Will reveal State tomorrow.



WINNER LEADERBOARD - YEAR
1 win - Maximus, SueNZ




RULES
Each week 1 or more tasting notes from published wine critics will be given (that will remain anonymous) that all refer to the same wine. It is then up to the Forum to try and guess what the wine is. Points will be given to each Forum member that guess the correct answer about the wine before it is revealed. The categories that will attract points for the right answers are the following:

Country - Will always be Australia (no points awarded)
State - 2 points
Region - 2 points
Varietial - 3 points
Year - 4 points
Winery - 5 points
Name of Wine - 1 point

Guess the Reviewer - 1 point for each correct guess


Everyday one/two categories will be revealed, which will then allow each Forum member to change their guesses for the remaining categories if they want to. This will continue each day until the wine is revealed. The winner is the person with the most points at the end of the week. Unfortunately, there are no prizes, just a chance to show off your wine guessing prowess on the WWW.

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 3:41 pm
by Winefront Monthly
Can I take a guess?

:D

Campbell.

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 3:45 pm
by Gavin Trott
Winefront Monthly wrote:Can I take a guess?

:D

Campbell.


Depends if you wrote one of the notes!!

:lol: :lol:

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 3:47 pm
by Winefront Monthly
I always recognise my own words.

Not that I'm giving anything away.

Campbell.

:D

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 3:53 pm
by GraemeG
Winefront Monthly wrote:I always recognise my own words.

Not that I'm giving anything away.

Campbell.

:D


Yes, I thought Note 2 read like one of Campbell's...
cheers,
Graeme

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:07 pm
by GRB
Now you just have to keep Campbell quiet :roll:

State - SA
Region - Barossa
Varietial - Shiraz Cab
Year - 2002
Winery - Kaesler
Name of Wine - WOMS

Campbell and someone else.

Glen

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:26 pm
by MartinE
GRB wrote:Now you just have to keep Campbell quiet :roll:

State - SA
Region - Barossa
Varietial - Shiraz Cab
Year - 2002
Winery - Kaesler
Name of Wine - WOMS

Campbell and someone else.

Glen


What he said with Campbell and JO as the critics.

M.

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:29 pm
by Davo
SA
Barossa
Shiraz CAb
2002
Kaesler
WOMS

Oliver and Campbell

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:29 pm
by Winefront Monthly
I apologise. I will be quiet in future.

Campbell.

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:34 pm
by cranky
Country - Australia
State - SA
Region -Clare
Varietial - Shiraz
Year -2002
Winery - Killikanoon
Name of Wine - Oracle

reviewers Huon and Campbell (bandwagon time!)

(even though it sounds like it has some cabernet characters...)

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:54 pm
by Christo
..follow the leader!

SA
Barossa
Shiraz CAb
2002
Kaesler
WOMS
8)

cd

oh CM & JO

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 2:22 am
by Mike Hawkins
Obviously I'm late to the game - time zones don't help. As soon as I read the TNs, 2002 WOMS stood out to me as well.....

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 9:20 am
by Sharkey
OK. I'll play left field.

Country - Australia
State - Victoria
Region - Pyrenees
Varietial - Cabernet
Year - 2000
Winery - Redbank
Name of Wine – Sally’s Paddock

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 9:36 am
by Maximus
Tip:

Don't follow the leader. :wink: 8)

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:49 pm
by mphatic
Country - Australia
State - Vic
Region - Heathcote
Varietal - Shiraz
Year - 2002
Winery - WDCE
Wine - Duck Muck

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 1:32 pm
by Deejay
Country - Australia
State - SA
Region - Clare
Varietal - Shiraz
Year - 1998
Winery - Jim Barry
Wine - Armagh

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 1:51 pm
by Cellar Rat
Kaesler Barossa Valley W.O.M.S. Shiraz Cabernet 2002

I suggest you use TN's from people that don't have online databases, like White, White, Hooke, etc.

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 2:03 pm
by Deejay
I suggest you use TN's from people that don't have online databases, like White, White, Hooke, etc.


Or people could just guess based on the notes, without searching - It is more fun having a blind guess - it is not as if you win anything

Dave

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:12 pm
by Andrew Jordan
Ok State is ....

Country - Australia
State - South Australia

Region - McClaren Vale/Barossa/Clare
Varietial - Shiraz/Cabernet/Cabernet-Shiraz
Year - 1998/2000/2002
Winery - :roll:
Name of Wine - :roll:

Will reveal Region tomorrow.

Change the rest of your guesses if you want to. Still plenty of points out there on offer.

Remember to make sure you put your guesses down for reviewers as well.

WEEKLY LEADERBOARD SO FAR:

2 points - GRB, MartinE, Davo, cranky, Christo, Mike Hawkins, Deejay, Cellar Rat
0 points - Sharkey, mphatic
-2 points - Campbell

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:29 pm
by Deejay
Hooke and Mattinson

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:02 pm
by SueNZ
I obviously missed something here. I'm late to the thread, it is Thursday, and region hasn't been revealed.
So was it the Kaesler WOMS - which I had to look up to find meant Weapon of Mass Destruction - to someone's liver no doubt?
LOL.
I couldn't find it on Google, for what it is worth, and I don't have Oliver's and Mattinson's online databases. Though I would have gone SA with those options and those notes.

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:04 pm
by Alex F
always thought it meant weapons of mass seduction... but...

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:12 pm
by SueNZ
Alex F wrote:always thought it meant weapons of mass seduction... but...


Yeah - you're right, I got it wrong. Never seen or tasted the wine. Don't even know if it comes to NZ. But I am sure it is seductive.

Apologies to the crew.

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:31 pm
by Maximus
Sue,

Yes, it comes into New Zealand. I sourced half a dozen for myself last year, and I was greedy. I only have two left. I had to show it off to all the Aussies that came over to visit me. Last I heard there were only a couple of loose bottles floating around. Brought in by Hancocks. Let me know if you want some tracked down. It's a superb wine. Contrary to the tasting notes of this thread (if in fact it was the WOMS), I wouldn't have called it a tannic wine. I think it sells circa $60-$70 over here.

Cheers,

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:40 pm
by SueNZ
Thanks Maximus,
Now I remember Glengary is the agent for Kaesler. Maybe they will have it for tasting at their next road show, if I get invited.
Everyone is saying this WOMS is a Shiraz-Cab, yet the option is Cabernet-Shiraz !!
I looked up the Kaesler website and they don't actually say what the blend is. In fact they don't say much at all.
Cheers,
Sue

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:25 pm
by cranky
Well, it has been a week without an update... is everyone okay out there?

Or was it all just too googlin' disappointing? :wink: