Page 1 of 1

Peter Lehmann 'The Barossa' Shiraz 2002

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:46 am
by grasshopper
I opened a bottle of Peter Lehmann 'The Barossa' Shiraz 2002 last night. My tasting note writing skills are not quite developed so I won't even try here. However, I must say that this relative cheapie was excellent. The best way I can describe it is that it was extremely smooth and balanced with no harsh aftertaste and great flavour.

I had tried the Heartland Shiraz on the previous night and can say that the Peter Lehmann compares favourably to that.

For all the quaffer drinkers out there, this one might be worth having a crack at. I think I bought a 6 pack in a mixed case for about $12.00 each a couple of months back. I think you can get it for around $14.00 now.

If anyone else has a proper tasting note on this wine then please let me know as I'd like to see what characteristics my palate obviously enjoys at the moment.

Cheers,
Andrew

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:41 am
by 707
This is typical of what happens in a great vintage when almost all the fruit is of high quality. The 1998 was great here as well as was the 1998 Cabernet.

Excellent value, these wines will cellar and improve.

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:43 am
by Andrew Jordan
Steve/Andrew,

Totally agree with both of you. The 1998 Cabernet and Shiraz are both drinking very well right now. Unfortunately we are down to our last case of each. :cry: But the 2002's are just as good and have bought a few cases of each to enjoy over the next 2 - 6 years. IMHO the cabernet is the better of the two ... just.

Tasting note...

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 12:00 pm
by The lone gunmen
Yup, its good alright. I dont really write "notes" I just remember the good ones and forget the rest. I liked its ripe berry tones and its meandering length.

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 12:43 pm
by bacchaebabe
I had the 98 shiraz of this the other night. Found it a bit too acoholic and disjointed and maybe just a little musty on the nose. Might have been very mildly tainted as the mustiness wasn't evident on the palate at all. At first I thought it was just bottle stink that might blow off but it didn't.

It was Ok but I wasn't super impressed as there was little fruit to speak of.

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 3:31 pm
by Davo
Brief TNs from a CD tasting earlier this year

Colour - Deep Garnet lighter at the rim

Nose - Violets and vanillin oak

Palate - Mocca, vanilla, Blackberry, soft tannins, mid finish

Overall impression - excellent VFM at $18 CD price