92 bin 389
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:16 pm
How good are these?
We have a few cases at home and unsure of the current value.
Cheers.
We have a few cases at home and unsure of the current value.
Cheers.
Australia's First, and best, wine discussion board, and group ... Join Us!
https://forum.auswine.club/
gtr80y wrote:for what reason would the value decrease?
sorry, I'm not much of a wine connoisseur.
Red Bigot wrote:gtr80y wrote:for what reason would the value decrease?
sorry, I'm not much of a wine connoisseur.
The value could decrease as the wine is from a "lesser" vintage and is now 13 years old. Depending on cellaring conditions it could be starting to fade by now, increasing the risk of buying and thus reducing the price people may be willing to pay.
I only bought 3 of these on release just to keep a line going and thought it was going nowhere when I drank the last one last year.
gtr80y wrote:How good are these?
We have a few cases at home and unsure of the current value.
Cheers.
FatBoy wrote:Red Bigot wrote:gtr80y wrote:for what reason would the value decrease?
sorry, I'm not much of a wine connoisseur.
The value could decrease as the wine is from a "lesser" vintage and is now 13 years old. Depending on cellaring conditions it could be starting to fade by now, increasing the risk of buying and thus reducing the price people may be willing to pay.
I only bought 3 of these on release just to keep a line going and thought it was going nowhere when I drank the last one last year.
Bought one and one only to make sure I'd tried the lot, and this is possibly the worst (along with the 95 ??) 389 since the 80's. I even preferred those relative failures from 1999-2001 inc.
I wouldn't pay $20 for them.
FatBoy wrote:Red Bigot wrote:gtr80y wrote:for what reason would the value decrease?
sorry, I'm not much of a wine connoisseur.
The value could decrease as the wine is from a "lesser" vintage and is now 13 years old. Depending on cellaring conditions it could be starting to fade by now, increasing the risk of buying and thus reducing the price people may be willing to pay.
I only bought 3 of these on release just to keep a line going and thought it was going nowhere when I drank the last one last year.
Bought one and one only to make sure I'd tried the lot, and this is possibly the worst (along with the 95 ??) 389 since the 80's. I even preferred those relative failures from 1999-2001 inc.
I wouldn't pay $20 for them.
Guest wrote:I think 95 is actually a suprise. Its not a 94 or 96 etc but its not too bad.