1994 Leasingham Classic Clare Sparkling Shiraz

Adair · Post by **Adair** » Mon Mar 14, 2005 2:34 pm

1994 Leasingham Classic Clare Sparkling Shiraz Ãƒâ€šÃ¢â‚¬â€œ Clare Valley, SA

Ripe blackcurrants and blackberries with hints mushroom and earth. Smooth with very good palate weigh, good length and lovely sweet fruit balance but seems to lack depth and complexity. Very enjoyable but nothing great. A little disappointing, especially after the great 1992. 16.9/20. $50.

Adair

Brucer · Post by **Brucer** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:30 pm

Hi Adair,
Wine is a strange thing.
I love the 94, had another bottle last week, and have a dozen still to drink.
Maybe your bottle was crook?
I hate the 92. Fruit seems to have faded, leaving hard bitter tannins. It went to langtons.
The 91 is very good also.
Bruce

TORB · Post by **TORB** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 pm

Boy, wat would use guys no! Use are both rong!!

I loved the 92 and the last bottle what I drunk at the Mad Hungarians was triffic. The 94 aint no slouch either, I also love it, but not quite as much as the 92.

markg · Post by **markg** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:26 pm

Brucer wrote:Hi Adair,
Wine is a strange thing.
I love the 94, had another bottle last week, and have a dozen still to drink.
Maybe your bottle was crook?
I hate the 92. Fruit seems to have faded, leaving hard bitter tannins. It went to langtons.
The 91 is very good also.
Bruce

I Agree with you Brucer, I shared this bottle at the same table with Adair and I personally liked it alot. Others at the table thought it not complex enough (which is somewhat true), but I think it made up for it in sheer lushness and juiciness.

Attila · Post by **Attila** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am

I certainly hope that the 1994 Leasingham will at least be as good or better than the 1994 Seppelt Show Reserve because it will open this year's overseas Shiraz tasting later this year.
The 1992 for me was a true stunner, drunk it three times last year but I haven't tried the 1994 yet, only the Seppelt.
I hope people will like the Leasingham.
Cheers,
Attila

markg · Post by **markg** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:39 am

Attila wrote:I certainly hope that the 1994 Leasingham will at least be as good or better than the 1994 Seppelt Show Reserve because it will open this year's overseas Shiraz tasting later this year.
The 1992 for me was a true stunner, drunk it three times last year but I haven't tried the 1994 yet, only the Seppelt.
I hope people will like the Leasingham.
Cheers,
Attila

Hi Attila,

The Seppelt SR is a level of complexity above the Leasingham for sure. On its own though, without comparing it, the Leasingham is a very nice, enjoyable wine, but I don't know how it will be received with your very trig European wine buddies, if you want to impress then the 94 Seppelts SR would probably be best.

Gary W · Post by **Gary W** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 11:08 am

Attila wrote:I certainly hope that the 1994 Leasingham will at least be as good or better than the 1994 Seppelt Show Reserve because it will open this year's overseas Shiraz tasting later this year.

Cheers,
Attila

Should not even be mentioned together so far ahead is the Seppelt 94. The 94 Classic Clare fizz is a bit sickly and reeks of coconut oil. Well that is what I think anyway.

GW

Attila · Post by **Attila** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 8:26 am

Great...my morale has been lifted!
The courier took the 1994 Leasingham overseas already....I'll just have to take it as it comes.
Cheers,
Attila

Sean · Post by **Sean** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 12:39 pm

deleted

TORB · Post by **TORB** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:42 pm

Hi Sean,

All three vintages are most enjoyable and I would be happy to suck on a glass of them at any time.

In my opinion, the 1992 is the most complex and also has the best structure followed by the 1994; however the 1995 has seductive fruitand is probably the easiest and most luscious to drink.