Mount Mary & mailer theme
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:08 pm
Curious of the forums thoughts on the following-
I've noticed a continuous theme in the Mt Mary mailer over the years (which I kind of get bored with reading) & following are a couple quotes from the current mailer-
'judging from those wines that are being sold these days with their excessively high alcohols and high levels of extraction producing high tannin levels, it is obvious that too many winemakers are having real trouble with knowing what a good wine should be like'
'the medical profession has the ancient dictum of "primo non nocere" as a guide to good practice. Translated it is simply, 'firstly do no harm'. Maybe some winemakers would benefit by adopting it for their winemaking and the wine writers too for recommending today's blockbusters as great wines'.
It appears the good doctor is saying;
-too many winemakers are having real trouble with knowing what a good wine should be like,
-blockbusters are not great wines.
And and on the other hand, it appears Parker is saying Australia should stick with what it does best and not try to compete with the French.
I enjoy certain blockbusters & I don't buy Mt Mary because of the mailer prices.
So what is a good wine ?
Which blockbusters are no good ?
I've noticed a continuous theme in the Mt Mary mailer over the years (which I kind of get bored with reading) & following are a couple quotes from the current mailer-
'judging from those wines that are being sold these days with their excessively high alcohols and high levels of extraction producing high tannin levels, it is obvious that too many winemakers are having real trouble with knowing what a good wine should be like'
'the medical profession has the ancient dictum of "primo non nocere" as a guide to good practice. Translated it is simply, 'firstly do no harm'. Maybe some winemakers would benefit by adopting it for their winemaking and the wine writers too for recommending today's blockbusters as great wines'.
It appears the good doctor is saying;
-too many winemakers are having real trouble with knowing what a good wine should be like,
-blockbusters are not great wines.
And and on the other hand, it appears Parker is saying Australia should stick with what it does best and not try to compete with the French.
I enjoy certain blockbusters & I don't buy Mt Mary because of the mailer prices.
So what is a good wine ?
Which blockbusters are no good ?