TVs: Brief impressions on Rockford StonewallerÂ’s CD wines
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 10:06 am
<b>NV Rockford RD Pinot Chardonnay (Sparkling White)</b>
Pretty simple bouquet and largely innocuous on the palate with barely a hint of fruit. Very soft and easy to swill but lacks character, nuance and individuality. CanÂ’t complain too much given the price. A$16
<b>Good 16.5 / 20</b>
<b>2001 Rockford Eden Valley Riesling</b>
Not bad. Involving mix of fresh lime and minerals. Nice acid backbone. Still rather tight but drinks well. I expected less but it delivered more than my expectations. A$17.50
<b>Very Good 17.0 / 20</b>
<b>2001 Rockford Local Growers Semillon</b>
Very old style and really not to my tastes. Seems more advanced than its years. Not a fan. A$17
<b>Good 16.0 / 20</b>
<b>2004 Rockford White Frontignac </b>
Very pleasant nose with myriad sweet fruits. Nice palate augmented with medium length finish. Refreshing wine and not at all bad for the style. A$13
<b>Very Good 17.0 / 20</b>
<b>2004 Rockford Alicante Bouchet</b>
Fresh and intoxicating bouquet. No hint of oak or tannin. Quite delicious. I have long been a fan of this wine for some years – especially nice slightly chilled. Good stuff! A$16
<b>Good 17.5 / 20</b>
<b>1999 Rockford Moppa Springs Grenache/Shiraz/Mataro</b>
Nice nose and palate, filled with berries, some spice and pepper. Good follow through with nice finish. Very good wine for the price. Only criticism – bit simple. A$21.50
<b>Very Good 17.0 / 20</b>
<b>2001 Rockford Rod & Spur Cabernet/Shiraz</b>
Ahh, now this is better! Much more weight, better structure and more singularly focussed black berry fruit with dry tannin finish. A$28
<b>Very Good 17.5 / 20</b>
<b>1998 Rockford Cabernet Sauvignon</b>
Originally an export order that didnÂ’t make it! Riper lush cabernet fruit with tannins still kicking in. Needs another 2-3 years IMO to be at its peak but drinking very well. Still quite primary and hasnÂ’t shutdown. A$45
<b>Very Good 17.7 / 20</b>
<b>1998 Rockford SVS Shiraz Pressings</b>
2nd Pressings released after the 1984. This is a powerhouse wine but not over the top. Some semblance of balance and potential complexity down the line but well contained in its seamless structure. Massive dark fruits and a chunk of tannin with some hint of the American oak. In short, long and powerful. Keep for 10 years. A$70
<b>Excellent 18.0 / 20</b>
<b>1998 Rockford SVS Flaxman Valley Shiraz</b>
Half of this comes from Chris Ringland’s low yielding and dry grown old vines. More restrained than the Pressings but too me not enough stuffing to make it memorable. I don’t mean it should’ve been bigger, but needed a finer delineation of the Shiraz fruit than it provided. It was – believe it or not –almost one-dimensional and boring! A good wine to be sure, but for $70 I expect a lot more and blind would have guessed it to be a $30 wine at most. It did have a silkiness to it but lacks excitement. From the outset I should’ve stated that I am not a huge fan of the several Rockford SVS Shiraz’s I’ve had (much preferring the blended Basket Press). A$70
<b>Very Good 17.5 / 20</b>
Pretty simple bouquet and largely innocuous on the palate with barely a hint of fruit. Very soft and easy to swill but lacks character, nuance and individuality. CanÂ’t complain too much given the price. A$16
<b>Good 16.5 / 20</b>
<b>2001 Rockford Eden Valley Riesling</b>
Not bad. Involving mix of fresh lime and minerals. Nice acid backbone. Still rather tight but drinks well. I expected less but it delivered more than my expectations. A$17.50
<b>Very Good 17.0 / 20</b>
<b>2001 Rockford Local Growers Semillon</b>
Very old style and really not to my tastes. Seems more advanced than its years. Not a fan. A$17
<b>Good 16.0 / 20</b>
<b>2004 Rockford White Frontignac </b>
Very pleasant nose with myriad sweet fruits. Nice palate augmented with medium length finish. Refreshing wine and not at all bad for the style. A$13
<b>Very Good 17.0 / 20</b>
<b>2004 Rockford Alicante Bouchet</b>
Fresh and intoxicating bouquet. No hint of oak or tannin. Quite delicious. I have long been a fan of this wine for some years – especially nice slightly chilled. Good stuff! A$16
<b>Good 17.5 / 20</b>
<b>1999 Rockford Moppa Springs Grenache/Shiraz/Mataro</b>
Nice nose and palate, filled with berries, some spice and pepper. Good follow through with nice finish. Very good wine for the price. Only criticism – bit simple. A$21.50
<b>Very Good 17.0 / 20</b>
<b>2001 Rockford Rod & Spur Cabernet/Shiraz</b>
Ahh, now this is better! Much more weight, better structure and more singularly focussed black berry fruit with dry tannin finish. A$28
<b>Very Good 17.5 / 20</b>
<b>1998 Rockford Cabernet Sauvignon</b>
Originally an export order that didnÂ’t make it! Riper lush cabernet fruit with tannins still kicking in. Needs another 2-3 years IMO to be at its peak but drinking very well. Still quite primary and hasnÂ’t shutdown. A$45
<b>Very Good 17.7 / 20</b>
<b>1998 Rockford SVS Shiraz Pressings</b>
2nd Pressings released after the 1984. This is a powerhouse wine but not over the top. Some semblance of balance and potential complexity down the line but well contained in its seamless structure. Massive dark fruits and a chunk of tannin with some hint of the American oak. In short, long and powerful. Keep for 10 years. A$70
<b>Excellent 18.0 / 20</b>
<b>1998 Rockford SVS Flaxman Valley Shiraz</b>
Half of this comes from Chris Ringland’s low yielding and dry grown old vines. More restrained than the Pressings but too me not enough stuffing to make it memorable. I don’t mean it should’ve been bigger, but needed a finer delineation of the Shiraz fruit than it provided. It was – believe it or not –almost one-dimensional and boring! A good wine to be sure, but for $70 I expect a lot more and blind would have guessed it to be a $30 wine at most. It did have a silkiness to it but lacks excitement. From the outset I should’ve stated that I am not a huge fan of the several Rockford SVS Shiraz’s I’ve had (much preferring the blended Basket Press). A$70
<b>Very Good 17.5 / 20</b>