Page 1 of 1

Melb East offline at Wildflower

Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:17 pm
by ChrisH
Sometime posters Anthony, Neville K, Rory, Sanjay, Pau and myself met at Wildflower restaurant in Canterbury to celebrate the fact that it was Tuesday 30th March :roll: (oh, and to congratulate (?) Anthony on becoming engaged). All wines were presented blind.


NV Devaux Champagne (Anthony)
Pale lemon colour, and a particularly fine, persistent bead. A fresh and vibrant apertif style, showing a good balance of yeast autolysis and chalky, lemony fruit. Quite rich on the mid-palate. A great way to commence proceedings.


1993 Jobard Meursault (Neville)
Lemon colour,. The nose smelled like French chardonnay (toast, hazelnuts, grapefruit and butter). After the first taste I had to check if I had any enamel left on my teeth however – jeez that is acidic ! Austere, a touch of minerality and plenty of acid summarised the palate – had to be Chablis surely? I still reckon the producer mis-labelled the wine. :lol:


2000 Rousseau Charmes-Chambertin (Anthony)
Translucent ruby. Complex and already quite open nose of perfumed black cherries, followed through to the palate. Some peacock’s tail evident on swallowing. Most of us went to Central Otago – this is amazingly open for a young Burgundy – suppose that is a characteristic of this vintage.


1994 Vieux Telegraphe Chateauneuf-du-Pape (Chris)
Ruby colour. Complex, multifaceted nose showing Johnson's baby powder, perfume, some sweatiness, spice and savoury Grenache fruit. Long, rich palate that, although drinking well, could be kept for some time without deterioration.


1995 Geyser Peak Alexander Valley Reserve Cabernet (Pau)
A new world ring-in. Deep youthful ruby. Unusually changed considerably over half an hour – started off with a strong vanillan-coconut aroma, which dissipated to reveal ripe Cabernet-style fruit and structure. Then became a bit harsh on the finish after some more time in the glass. Would need to look at this again before being able to assess its future.


1997 Greponne Mazzi Brunello di Montalcino (Sanjay)
Red-ruby. Chalky spice, earth and slightly bitter red cherry fruit, typical of Sangiovese clones. Went really well with my steak and Meditteranean Vegetables.


1995 Carpineto Vino Nobile di Montelpulciano (Sanjay)
Red in colour. Have written that is is a good Chianti style (ripe, bitter cherry fruit) – notes starting to deteriorate at this point.

1996 Mastrojanni Brunello di Montalcino (Rory)
Powerful wine, quite oaky as can be the case with some Brunellos. Rich fruit cam up more into balance as the wine opened up.

1998 Muller-Catoir Auslese (Sanjay)
Light lemon colour. Lovely aromatic nose of pears and lychees. Light, sweet middle palate, cleaned up by a crisp acid finish. More please.....


regards
Chris

Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 4:06 pm
by Anthony
Great notes chris.
The Devaux was a great fizz. It is listed as the cuvee 2000.

I highly recommend Wildflower in Canterbury. My duck was sensational and the service was professional and good.

Every dinner we seem to raise the bar on the wines we drink, we are going to be in trouble next dinner :lol:

cheers
anthony

Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 8:13 pm
by Guest
Hey Anth,....a Carey girl??? :wink:

Congratulations, you fool.

Cheers
Chris Judd
Brisbane

Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 9:05 pm
by Guest
Nah mate,
neighboring school, Genazanno!!!

Been a big week. Sitting at dinner tonight with my father and twin brother and family and we have had so far:
90 Cristal: awsome. So lively, almost perfect.
91 Lafite: too young, needs another 10 years.
79 Wolf Blass Cab/Shiraz/Malbec: drinking very well. In it's prime and should hang on for a few more years.

cheers and thanks
anthony

Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 10:48 pm
by Guest
what do you mean by peacock's tail on the finish?

peacock's tail

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2004 1:42 pm
by Neville K
peacock's tail: an oft used phrase, particularly in respect of good pinot noir, where the persistence of the wine fans out to reach the back palate, seemingly spreading wider and longer from initial mouthfeel.

my 2c

neville k

Re: peacock's tail

Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 2:45 am
by Guest
Neville K wrote:peacock's tail: an oft used phrase, particularly in respect of good pinot noir, where the persistence of the wine fans out to reach the back palate, seemingly spreading wider and longer from initial mouthfeel.

my 2c

neville k


actually it's used, correctly in context, almost exclusively for the finer wines of chambolle, specifically Le Musigny grand cru.

Re: peacock's tail

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:06 pm
by Guest
Anonymous wrote:
Neville K wrote:peacock's tail: an oft used phrase, particularly in respect of good pinot noir, where the persistence of the wine fans out to reach the back palate, seemingly spreading wider and longer from initial mouthfeel.

my 2c

neville k


actually it's used, correctly in context, almost exclusively for the finer wines of chambolle, specifically Le Musigny grand cru.


oh yes...of course guest...they would be the only wines that have this character....what a load of pedantic rubbish

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:28 pm
by Guest
I think the point is that this character ISN'T found on all wines, and is misapplied when it shouldn't be.

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2004 8:19 pm
by ChrisH
What is this - Guest versus Guest ? Log in under a name ! :?

regards
Chris

Re: peacock's tail

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2004 8:55 pm
by PaulV
Anonymous wrote:
Neville K wrote:peacock's tail: an oft used phrase, particularly in respect of good pinot noir, where the persistence of the wine fans out to reach the back palate, seemingly spreading wider and longer from initial mouthfeel.

my 2c

neville k


actually it's used, correctly in context, almost exclusively for the finer wines of chambolle, specifically Le Musigny grand cru.


Guest, I have never read such utter crap. Just go to google and you will find '000's of quotes from such respected burgundy critics as Clive Coates and Allan Meadows (Burghound) using the term for burgundies from all burgundy villages - it's a taste sensation not a terroir definition the person is describing.

Here's Burghound on a Gevrey Chambertin for example"




ALLEN MEADOWS
1st Quarter, 2003 - issue 9

Progress Report: Head to Head - Chambertin vs. Clos de Bèze
117 Wines from 1919 to 1999
17th. and 18th. October 2002 Tasting


1991 CHAMBERTIN CLOS DE BEZE : Classic Clos de Bèze nose that offers an explosion of incredibly complex aromas with a flavor spectrum so broad that is akin to the unfolding of a peacock's tail. Rich, dense and structured with a finish that is almost painfully intense. Still very young, though more expressive today than the Chambertin, and offers a wonderful combination of power and finesse. There are solid tannins but they are completely buffered by all of the mid-palate sap. An elegant, altogether exquisite Clos de Bèze. 94/2006-18.


Hoping to educate.
Cheers

Paul

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:40 pm
by Guest
Paul,
that's not "A" gevrey for a start. so far from it.

I happen to agree with this wine, I had it 3 weeks ago and it certainly did.
unlike the chambertin itself which is long dense and powerful, there is a wonderful chinese spice width on the finish, a panoply of flavours too broad to describe.
that was both the 1991's btw, how have you found them?

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:42 pm
by Guest
Anonymous wrote:Paul,
that's not "A" gevrey for a start. so far from it.

I happen to agree with this wine, I had it 3 weeks ago and it certainly did.
unlike the chambertin itself which is long dense and powerful, there is a wonderful chinese spice width on the finish, a panoply of flavours too broad to describe.
that was both the 1991's btw, how have you found them?


I can't help myself. I am a complete wanker.