2001 Burgundy TNs: some impressions
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:18 pm
2001 Burgundy Tasting 23 March 2004 Prince Tasting: $50 Tasted from Riedel Chianti stemware
* Earlier Tasting 19 March 2004 No contemporaneous notes
*2001 Nicolas Potel Bourgogne Rouge $31.50-35[mixed doz price v single bottle price]. Very pleasant
*2001 Nicolas Potel Gevey-Chambertin $77- 86
Punched well above its weight. quite charming and VFM; not lean and hard as G-C can be.
*2001 Nicolas Potel Vosne Romanee. $77-86
Regarded as better real estate, but not a better wine. On par.
2001 Domaine Frederic Esmonin Gevrey-Chambertin Estournelles St Jacques [Near top of hill; near but not Clos St Jacques](1er cru) $88-98
Bit closed; initially attractive. Sprightly. Fresh. Rich, full mouthfull. Direct attack. Very young at the moment and given 3-4 years I should think it would fill out nicely. A bit of a peacockÂ’s tail on the finish. Impressive start. On retaste post Bonnes- Mares looked considerably less impressive. Was I too generous with an Aussie John 87pts.
Last year FWIW re 2000 I noted: "Harder, grippier, firmer.Nice fruit. Solid masculine wine. Tannic. OK. Serious structure but lacking in plumpness. Assertive, but not aggressive."
Makes me think the 2001 was more attractive than 2000,albeit an earlier developer.
2001 Nicolas Potel Volnay Les Caillerets (1er cru) $105-117
Excellent clarity; bit more vegetative and autumnal leaf than no.1[:Gevrey E St J.] perfumed. Nice weight and balance. Charming. Firm acid structure on initial attack. Nice richness on palate. More astringent on finish than no 1, but neverthelesss soft and in balnce with a chunky velvety more substantive mouthfeel. 88 pts.
2001 Domaine Comte de Vogue Chambolle Musigny $135-150
Deeper in colour. Sturdy, spicy racy. Nice balance; not weighty. I suspect more alcohol or evident chaptalisation. Seems somewhat worked. Rich middle palate, but finishes a tad short and strained oak dominance. 86
FWIW last yearÂ’s2000 note:" Brick tuile, light in colour. some developed miniscus. Far more fragrant than Roumier. Ripe and intense. Really lovely. Simple velvet. Good mouthfeel and weight. Juicy. Persistent. Good, very honest pinot."
Notes suggest 2000 is preferable.
2001 Henri Gouges Les St Georges (1er cru) $140-156
Really closed. Very hard to comment. Yields very little. . Mealy; meaty; compact, fine. No personality expressed. Quite dank, tightly coiled and concentrated. 88
2001 Nicolas Potel Bonnes Mares $342-380
Fragrant. Perfume leaps out of the glass. Concentrated, voluptuous nose. Explosive, enveloping, enriched, expressive and encouraging. Powerful. Lovely balance. Harmonious. Full metal jacket. Originally 94 remarked 93 after de Vogue.
2001 Domaine Compte de Vogue Bonnes Mares $441-490
Powerful, compelling; rich yet fine and delicate. Beautifully expressed. Magisterial. Gorgeous balance; not tough or sinewy; undeniably grand cru+++
Vibrato, velvety structure. Absolutely classical. Pure Bonnes Mares. 95.
A hell of a lot of money. Only for the rich or truly decadent malhereusement.
* Earlier Tasting 19 March 2004 No contemporaneous notes
*2001 Nicolas Potel Bourgogne Rouge $31.50-35[mixed doz price v single bottle price]. Very pleasant
*2001 Nicolas Potel Gevey-Chambertin $77- 86
Punched well above its weight. quite charming and VFM; not lean and hard as G-C can be.
*2001 Nicolas Potel Vosne Romanee. $77-86
Regarded as better real estate, but not a better wine. On par.
2001 Domaine Frederic Esmonin Gevrey-Chambertin Estournelles St Jacques [Near top of hill; near but not Clos St Jacques](1er cru) $88-98
Bit closed; initially attractive. Sprightly. Fresh. Rich, full mouthfull. Direct attack. Very young at the moment and given 3-4 years I should think it would fill out nicely. A bit of a peacockÂ’s tail on the finish. Impressive start. On retaste post Bonnes- Mares looked considerably less impressive. Was I too generous with an Aussie John 87pts.
Last year FWIW re 2000 I noted: "Harder, grippier, firmer.Nice fruit. Solid masculine wine. Tannic. OK. Serious structure but lacking in plumpness. Assertive, but not aggressive."
Makes me think the 2001 was more attractive than 2000,albeit an earlier developer.
2001 Nicolas Potel Volnay Les Caillerets (1er cru) $105-117
Excellent clarity; bit more vegetative and autumnal leaf than no.1[:Gevrey E St J.] perfumed. Nice weight and balance. Charming. Firm acid structure on initial attack. Nice richness on palate. More astringent on finish than no 1, but neverthelesss soft and in balnce with a chunky velvety more substantive mouthfeel. 88 pts.
2001 Domaine Comte de Vogue Chambolle Musigny $135-150
Deeper in colour. Sturdy, spicy racy. Nice balance; not weighty. I suspect more alcohol or evident chaptalisation. Seems somewhat worked. Rich middle palate, but finishes a tad short and strained oak dominance. 86
FWIW last yearÂ’s2000 note:" Brick tuile, light in colour. some developed miniscus. Far more fragrant than Roumier. Ripe and intense. Really lovely. Simple velvet. Good mouthfeel and weight. Juicy. Persistent. Good, very honest pinot."
Notes suggest 2000 is preferable.
2001 Henri Gouges Les St Georges (1er cru) $140-156
Really closed. Very hard to comment. Yields very little. . Mealy; meaty; compact, fine. No personality expressed. Quite dank, tightly coiled and concentrated. 88
2001 Nicolas Potel Bonnes Mares $342-380
Fragrant. Perfume leaps out of the glass. Concentrated, voluptuous nose. Explosive, enveloping, enriched, expressive and encouraging. Powerful. Lovely balance. Harmonious. Full metal jacket. Originally 94 remarked 93 after de Vogue.
2001 Domaine Compte de Vogue Bonnes Mares $441-490
Powerful, compelling; rich yet fine and delicate. Beautifully expressed. Magisterial. Gorgeous balance; not tough or sinewy; undeniably grand cru+++
Vibrato, velvety structure. Absolutely classical. Pure Bonnes Mares. 95.
A hell of a lot of money. Only for the rich or truly decadent malhereusement.