Page 1 of 1

TN: 1993 James Irvine Grand Merlot

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:50 pm
by n4sir
1993 James Irvine Grand Merlot, Eden Valley (cork): The cork was fairly well soaked but pretty intact overall; there’s more crusting than the 1999 recently, but it’s not much and relatively fine. Medium red/brick. Aromatic bouquet with fresh/buttery herbs, cedar/coffee, tangy raspberries, camphor, tomato dust and green liquorice/green peas, becoming slightly more vegetal with breathing. Tangy/sweet entry followed by rather tart raspberries and caramel/coffee, sweet & sour and medium-weight with very fine, powdery tannins, finishing very long but very slender. It reminds me more than a little of a cooler Coonawarra, an old-school Leconfield kinda way - I like the way it’s drinking now, but haters of DMS characters should steer clear.

Cheers,
Ian

Re: TN: 1993 James Irvine Grand Merlot

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:59 pm
by Muscat Mike
n4sir wrote:[b] haters of DMS characters should steer clear.

Cheers,
Ian


Ian, DMS would that be Dusky Male Sweat?

Mike.

Re: TN: 1993 James Irvine Grand Merlot

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 11:25 pm
by Jay60A
DMS = di-methyl sulphide from memory.

Some DMS influenced wines can be very good from memory - Henschke Cyril 1993 and Yalumba FDR 1A(?) 2000. Generally considered a winemaking flaw though ...

Re: TN: 1993 James Irvine Grand Merlot

Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:07 am
by redstuff
I love trace amounts of dimethyl sulfide. Because DMS is very volatile (b.p. 37 C), swirling your glass will get rid of it quite easily. I think all of the Grand merlots i have tried 96,98,99 were full of it. Great wine though. Thanks for the tasting note Ian.