TN: Koonunga Hill Shi Cab 2007
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:58 pm
Yong at wine taste. pls give comments.
1st day=no breathing
Smell: upon open, lots of young fruity aroma-berries like. Upon swirl, more vanilla + a bit oak smell . very little oak though.
Palate: fruity & a bit acid, however a bit of tanin comes back. a bit of alcoholic hotness. medium body wine (not as thick as the yellow label I think) -easy drinking but lack depth.
aftertaste: short
Overall - light to medium body fruity wine, not as good as expected-no way near a 389 as some comments claimed. The lack of tanin gives the wine little no structure. If Yellow Label (the 2nd day with enough breathe) shiraz had been rated 81/100. This one should be a bit lower 79/100.
1 hour later ( 1/3 gone with screwd cap on)
Smell: getting more complex, a bit sweetness. The fragrant improved a lot after the 1st hour=it starts to smell like 389.
Palate: The oak seems come back-more balanced. the wine Seems have awakened but again no way near a 389 taste in my memory.
Overall - still medium body- fragrant improved as breathe longer. It just don't like that it has spend 20 months in used barrels in aging as said in the website - there are many many others whom spend just 5-9 months in barrel that displays much more oak than this KH SC.
5 hour later (1/2 gone with screwed cap on)
Smell; initally still lots of blackcurrent; smell fruity & good but the aroma disappear fairly quickly in glass even with heavy swirl.
Palate; sounds a bit like 389 with rather 1 dimension taste-still oak prescence is not much & aftertaste a bit acidic. => the wine has peaked ??
Look forward to taste it on 2nd day to see if can improve or not. Stocked 6 at a px of AUD$8.67 per bottle on special price.
1st day=no breathing
Smell: upon open, lots of young fruity aroma-berries like. Upon swirl, more vanilla + a bit oak smell . very little oak though.
Palate: fruity & a bit acid, however a bit of tanin comes back. a bit of alcoholic hotness. medium body wine (not as thick as the yellow label I think) -easy drinking but lack depth.
aftertaste: short
Overall - light to medium body fruity wine, not as good as expected-no way near a 389 as some comments claimed. The lack of tanin gives the wine little no structure. If Yellow Label (the 2nd day with enough breathe) shiraz had been rated 81/100. This one should be a bit lower 79/100.
1 hour later ( 1/3 gone with screwd cap on)
Smell: getting more complex, a bit sweetness. The fragrant improved a lot after the 1st hour=it starts to smell like 389.
Palate: The oak seems come back-more balanced. the wine Seems have awakened but again no way near a 389 taste in my memory.
Overall - still medium body- fragrant improved as breathe longer. It just don't like that it has spend 20 months in used barrels in aging as said in the website - there are many many others whom spend just 5-9 months in barrel that displays much more oak than this KH SC.
5 hour later (1/2 gone with screwed cap on)
Smell; initally still lots of blackcurrent; smell fruity & good but the aroma disappear fairly quickly in glass even with heavy swirl.
Palate; sounds a bit like 389 with rather 1 dimension taste-still oak prescence is not much & aftertaste a bit acidic. => the wine has peaked ??
Look forward to taste it on 2nd day to see if can improve or not. Stocked 6 at a px of AUD$8.67 per bottle on special price.