Re: Right, what are we/you drinking now .. tonight
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:15 pm
deleted
Australia's First, and best, wine discussion board, and group ... Join Us!
https://forum.auswine.club/
TiggerK wrote:Seriously nice drinking Con! Hmm, a touch of smoky bacon brett sounds good, albeit more friendly in Nth Rhone, I assume it just overpowered everything else.
Old Rayas is awesome, how I wish Aussie Grenache could try more towards this style...... I'm sure terroir is a big factor, but I suspect the winemaking is equally so.
I love the wine dinners around Christmas, everyone seems to pull out the good stuff.michel wrote:Often a conversation I have hadTiggerK wrote:Seriously nice drinking Con! Hmm, a touch of smoky bacon brett sounds good, albeit more friendly in Nth Rhone, I assume it just overpowered everything else.
Old Rayas is awesome, how I wish Aussie Grenache could try more towards this style...... I'm sure terroir is a big factor, but I suspect the winemaking is equally so.
How come we can’t do great grenache?
I have a secret soft spot for grenache but I want mote than a fruit bomb
Some CNDP can be most excellent
Many are big sloppy monsters.
Another post perhaps?
HI Felix.felixp21 wrote:great drinking, Con!!!Con J wrote:Christmas function last night.
2002 Krug. Acid, minerals, green apples, lovely.
1996 Krug. Advanced and slightly corked, acid and lacked fruit.
2013 Jean Charton – Chevalier Montrachet “Clos Des Chevaliers”. Tropical fruit, white flowers with a creamy vanilla finish.
2010 Blain Gagnard – Batard Montrachet. Liked it better the Chevalier.
2007 Armand Rousseau – Clos de la Roche. Very pretty from the start.
2001 Armand Rousseau – Clos de la Roche. Bottle stink at first and needed time to open up.
1982 Chateau Haut Brion – Smoky bacon brett, a shame.
2007 Bruno Giacosa – Le Rocche del Lalletto Riserva Barolo. This was absolutely fabulous.
1994 Henschke – Hill of Grace. Very good.
1998 Chateau Rayas – CdP Reserve. Burgundy in disguise, loved it.
1989 Hugel – Tokay Pinot Gris VT. Fresh and vibrant, good acid with time ahead.
2002 Dr Loosen – Bernkasteler Lay Riesling Eiswein. More advanced than the Hugel, good not great.
1970 Dows – Vintage Port. Great way to finish.
Cheers Con.
IMO, the Chevalier from Chartron is a better wine than BG's Batard (I own and have tasted both) but drinking a Chevalier at 4 years of age is like drinking a top Bordeaux at 4 years of age. Try it again in another 5-7 years and you will be amazed. Interestingly, I think Chartron's Chevalier is better than his Montrachet (hmmm, maybe, so does he... he always draws a skull and x-bones on his Chevalier barrel and seems to take most pride in showing it)
Chartron hit it out of the park in 2014, 15 and the little 16 he produced. His renovated winery is a beauty, and the quality has improved incredibly over the past 3 vintages.
Hi Tony.Sigmamupi wrote:Jamie - thanks. I will have to keep my hands off them for some time yet. I bought them at different times on sale at Ponti and unfortunately I didn't buy any of the 2007 Barbaresco Asili Riserva which was also on promo at 18% discount. I am not sure if I would want to pay the prices that any of the Bruno Giacosa current releases are demanding.JamieBahrain wrote:Tony
I had the 2007 Asili Riserva a few months ago and it was magnificent but will be better in 5 years with a long maturation plateau.
Falletto Riserva is a bit like Monfortino. It will outlive us all and I suggest keep an eye on beserkers forum or cellartracker to catch a long window- in about 10 years but !
Haven't had the 2004 from memory. Had magnums of 90's vintages I didn't feel ready three years back.
felixp21 wrote:Christmas function last night:
Moet and Chandon Brut NV bleh, commercial battery acid. At this level, there are a myriad of Grower Champagnes that offer miles better quality. Not a great start. 83pts drink now.
2010 Coche-Dury Meursault Perrieres flint and citrus, bit of smoke. Good length, although not quite as long as I would have hoped. Little bit worked, but still a lovely wine. Needs another 3-4 years to reach it's peak. 91pts drink 2020-2030
2005 Domaine Leflaive Chevalier Montrachet tropical fruits and butter. Nice touch of bitterness at the end, great length. I would have picked this as Meursault if blind. Much better then the Coche. 95pts drink now-2030.
I have had two Leflaives 6+ years in a row that are not pre-moxed, surely a minor miracle!!!
Perrot-Minot Chambertin Clos de Beze still an infant (like most 05's) this has masses of tannin but now it is easier to see the quality of the underlying fruit, which is simply superb. Bit of a waste to open now, but should be amazing in another decade. One of the 2005's I feel confident will evlove into something really special. 94+++ drink: 2030-2045
2000 Lynch Bages never been a fan of this wine. This continues those thoughts, a wine that is a little dilute and has a rather drying finish. Once again, I get the faint smell of vomit on the nose, not really what you want in a good Bordeaux. This has always been a polarising wine, and it is easy to see why. 88pts drink: now-2030
then there was some Port floating around, but i had to leave early and after a quick sip I forgot to check the label. Was pretty nice!!!
Sub-$50? Examples?felixp21 wrote:Christmas function last night:
Moet and Chandon Brut NV bleh, commercial battery acid. At this level, there are a myriad of Grower Champagnes that offer miles better quality. Not a great start. 83pts drink now.
sorry, I am not really that sure what is available down there wrt grower champagne. Up here, i could nominate scores that are cheaper than Moet NV here, therefore I presume the same applies down there. For me, Guilleminot NV Prestige ($35AUD in HK) is simply outstanding, and if it is available in Aus, jump in!!swirler wrote:Sub-$50? Examples?felixp21 wrote:Christmas function last night:
Moet and Chandon Brut NV bleh, commercial battery acid. At this level, there are a myriad of Grower Champagnes that offer miles better quality. Not a great start. 83pts drink now.
Gimonnetswirler wrote:Sub-$50? Examples?felixp21 wrote:Christmas function last night:
Moet and Chandon Brut NV bleh, commercial battery acid. At this level, there are a myriad of Grower Champagnes that offer miles better quality. Not a great start. 83pts drink now.
Moet is appalling in its lack of bottle fermented character. Total rip off.Mike Hawkins wrote:Gimonnetswirler wrote:Sub-$50? Examples?felixp21 wrote:Christmas function last night:
Moet and Chandon Brut NV bleh, commercial battery acid. At this level, there are a myriad of Grower Champagnes that offer miles better quality. Not a great start. 83pts drink now.
Pol Roger
Roederer
Piper
All are streets in front of Moet
would never even consider buying it, let alone cellaring it. Too many good Champagnes out thereswirler wrote:Most experts and champagne fanatics I've heard have said that it's remarkably good for the price and the huge volumes produced. A bit like Guigal CdR. Nobody is claiming it is awesome, though! Just decent for the money.
And if it's too acid for you, Felix, just cellar it a few years like DJ.
and while we are at it, Roederer own all the vineyards they use, and are considered by the locals as pretty much the original "grower" Champagne.swirler wrote:Gimonnet is the only grower there, Mike. Their NV is usually priced around $70 (although one place seems to have good prices on Gimonnet ATM.)
As I said, not much/no grower champagne for less than $50 in Australia.
Of those GMs only Piper is priced similarly to Moet. I agree that it is better.
Felix,
Have you heard of Google or wine-searcher?
To be clear, I was referring to the NV Brut Imperial. Have you tasted the stuff out in the market right now ? Pretty much entirely fruit driven with no discernible complexity from bottle ferment characters like the bready/doughy/biscuity notes. It’s like they’ve somehow managed the entire process of “time on lees” without deriving any of the nice characters that should come from said process.swirler wrote:What do you mean, Cuttlefish?
A number of the growers have become more expensive in recent times. Some ... eg Gimonnet... used to imported by the retailer, therein bypassing a profit centre. Others become more established brands and consequently prices moved ... eg Bonville. For others, I just don’t understand the NV pricing, especially as I know the CD prices (most of these of these are sub EUR 18 including French taxes which wouldn’t be paid by the importer), notwithstanding importation costs and WET etc.swirler wrote:Gimonnet is the only grower there, Mike. Their NV is usually priced around $70 (although one place seems to have good prices on Gimonnet ATM.)
As I said, not much/no grower champagne for less than $50 in Australia.
Of those GMs only Piper is priced similarly to Moet. I agree that it is better.
Felix,
Have you heard of Google or wine-searcher?
Wait till you try the 08 Comtes Felix. It destroys anything I’ve had from Taittinger ...... and Comtes is probably my favourite wine on the planet.felixp21 wrote:2008 Tattinger Artist Collection Sebastio Selgado
wowser!!! I am not usually a big fan of what I consider the gimmicky Champagne releases, but this is a truly stunning wine. Awesome mouth-feel, length and complexity, this needs another 3-5 years in a cool cellar by which time this will be monumental. I am a huge fan of the 2006 Comtes, but I think this just shades it. Amazing.
drink: 2020-2030 95 pts
It’s certainly not undrinkable for my tastes, but I think there are some larg-ish production labels that are better. I agree that 2 or 3 years cellaring improves itdeejay81 wrote:Contrary to the Moet NV bashing, I've had a number of 3-5 year bottle aged Moet's that have been quite delicious....
What’s the 06 Comtes like?Mike Hawkins wrote:Wait till you try the 08 Comtes Felix. It destroys anything I’ve had from Taittinger ...... and Comtes is probably my favourite wine on the planet.felixp21 wrote:2008 Tattinger Artist Collection Sebastio Selgado
wowser!!! I am not usually a big fan of what I consider the gimmicky Champagne releases, but this is a truly stunning wine. Awesome mouth-feel, length and complexity, this needs another 3-5 years in a cool cellar by which time this will be monumental. I am a huge fan of the 2006 Comtes, but I think this just shades it. Amazing.
drink: 2020-2030 95 pts
Taswirler wrote:06 Comte is really good. Moet x10,000 I gotta try the 08.
Mike,
Things were better a few years back. Definitely was a time to stock up
Cuttlefish,
Some would say that a lack of lees derived character isn't a bad thing if you are seeking terroir in wines. Although there's not much terroir in Moet