Its Sunday ... time for you weekly drinking reports...

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
beef
Posts: 179
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by beef »

Adair wrote:In fact, the 2004 Chalambar is not in the same league as the 2004 Seppelt Victorian Shiraz! Adair


*** I whole-heartedly agree. For ~10 bucks, I don't think I've ever tasted a better wine than the 2004 Victorian.

Oh, and the 2004 Chalambar is indeed crap.

Stuart

Adam

Post by Adam »

mkcoleman wrote:
Faustino I, 1996 Gran Reserve
10GBP from Heathrow airport when I was back some 6 months ago. Loveley drop, cherry red colour, medium bodied, mellow, smooth and nice gentle finish
Aggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....Dr Ahnoose!!

Old joke :)

Davo
Posts: 1120
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:09 pm

Post by Davo »

beef wrote:
Oh, and the 2004 Chalambar is indeed crap.

Stuart


Actually yes, and no.

I have had a huge amount of bottle variation with this wine. We just finished a dozen, all shipped together. 2 bottles were brilliant, 2 were undrinkable and the rest were scattered in between. Some were possibly showing signs of undergoing either a secondary ferment or mlf in the bottle as they opened with a distinct pop.

davidg
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 2:16 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by davidg »

Adair wrote:David,

Good note. Thanks. Similar characters to my bottle but... "a hint of spice"... my bottle had heaps of spice and all other things nice - pepper, leather, earth and a heap of Penfolds-like formic acid - crushed ants. Seriously great complexity.

<snip>

No issues for my $25. I wish the 2004 Chalambar was in the same league, but alas it is not. In fact, the 2004 Chalambar is not in the same league as the 2004 Seppelt Victorian Shiraz! What has happened to the 2004 Chalambar since it was bottled? :? :shock:

Adair


I wonder if I drank it a tad to cold. I sometimes find that the first thing I loose as the temp in the glass falls is complexity in the spice notes rather than the fruit.

Never tried the 2004 -- sounds like I haven't missed anything
David G

"I'm going to die with a twinkle in my eye cause I sung songs, spun stories, loved, laughed and drank wine"

User avatar
n4sir
Posts: 4023
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 10:53 pm
Location: Adelaide

Post by n4sir »

bacchaebabe wrote:96 Penfolds Old Vine This is a blend and not made anymore, methinks. Unfortunately, a bit tired. Fruit quite muted and while pleasant enough, just felt a bit over the hill. Pass


This has been known as the Bin 138 Old Vine GSM (or thereabouts) since the 1998 vintage. I've still got a couple of the 1996 left, so I'd better try one soon by the sound of it.

Cheers,
Ian
Forget about goodness and mercy, they're gone.

Gary W
Posts: 993
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 10:41 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by Gary W »

n4sir wrote:
bacchaebabe wrote:96 Penfolds Old Vine This is a blend and not made anymore, methinks. Unfortunately, a bit tired. Fruit quite muted and while pleasant enough, just felt a bit over the hill. Pass


This has been known as the Bin 138 Old Vine GSM (or thereabouts) since the 1998 vintage. I've still got a couple of the 1996 left, so I'd better try one soon by the sound of it.

Cheers,
Ian


The 94 Old Vine is still going strong. Lovely wine.
GW

Post Reply