Page 2 of 4

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:07 pm
by GrahamB
Brian

My guess is

2168 corks

Graham

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:07 pm
by GrahamB
As we have been allowed two guesses then

2276

Graham

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:13 pm
by Daryl Douglas
I like the ones that are black at one end :lol:!!!

The dimensions aren't those of a really big fishtank.

I reckon about 850.

daz

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:23 pm
by Andrew Jordan
Andrew,

1. I'm retired, I have plenty of time and it only happens about every 8-10 years. I broke it into batches and counted them into small containers so I wouldn't lose count too often, I did have to recount some batches.


As an accountant by trade, it is wonderful to see good auditing procedures in place. :P

2. These are only the corks with brands on them (not just the cork maker/batch), the non-branded ones go off for various good (so I'm told) uses. So you would have to at least double the number of bottles drunk, or at least tasted, though only a very small portion of tasting group wines make it into the tank. (It's more than your guess too.)


So what would this number be out of interest sake? :roll:

2nd guess for me 1,519 (marked corks).

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:26 pm
by alimunro
put me down for 2005


been lurking for a while - but this is the challenge I needed to make me register.

cheers,
al

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:28 pm
by Andrew Jordan
been lurking for a while - but this is the challenge I needed to make me register.


Brian,

The ploy worked! :D

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:31 pm
by Mal
Im going to go 1070 8)

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:48 pm
by Vickie
Hi Brian,

Fingers crossed...2404

:P

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:54 pm
by Vickie
How about 2776?

Vickie :lol:

...this is excellent

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:05 pm
by camw
1) 1178
2) 1179

Thanks Brian.

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:54 pm
by platinum
1124 was my guess without a clue

So I will say 1070 which is 54 less than my first guess...Damn someone has covered that :(

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:57 pm
by Chuck
Second guess 1788.

Chuck

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:01 pm
by Davo
If we are second guessing, and I find people doing it to me every day, I would have to guess 1834

Thanks for the fun and I hope to help you get started on the next tank

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:05 pm
by Muscat Mike
Well Chief,
would you believe 1888 :idea: :?: :?: :?:
MM.

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:08 pm
by Christo
Brian,
have to say great respone 42 post thus far & 290 views...great ratio! :wink: Amazing what a chance at a free bottle of wine will do!! ... & i'll bet we've all got excessive cellars as it is. :twisted:

By the way, what happens if the wine is corked?! :shock: :shock: :wink: :lol:

c 8)

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:47 pm
by jester
Brian,
1389

or

1228

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:50 pm
by Steve
1178!

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:15 am
by MartinJohnC
How about 2160 ?

Thanks Martin

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:38 am
by Serge Birbrair
second guess
2166

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:40 am
by Deejay
second guess 1711

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:48 am
by Red Bigot
alimunro wrote:put me down for 2005


been lurking for a while - but this is the challenge I needed to make me register.

cheers,
al


Welcome aboard Al, keep on posting now you have taken the plunge.

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:49 am
by Red Bigot
Christo wrote:By the way, what happens if the wine is corked?! :shock: :shock: :wink: :lol:
c 8)


I'll either give you your money back or give you John Glaetzer's address/fax number. ;-)

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:19 am
by JohnP
First guess - 1952

Second guess - 1900

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:32 am
by Mike Hawkins
1864

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:41 am
by GrahamB
JohnP wrote:First guess - 1952

Second guess - 1900


John, I'm guessing a birth year here. But which one?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:45 am
by Red Bigot
I'm still waiting for the scientific approach to appear, where are all the mathematicians and engineers?

50 x 27 x 30 = 40500 cc = 40.5 litres (plus a little more 'cos it's heaped up over the top edge a little in the middle), now you just need to work out the average volume of a cork under random stacking conditions where there is a large variation in cork size. :shock: :twisted:

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:56 am
by JohnP
Red Bigot wrote:I'm still waiting for the scientific approach to appear, where are all the mathematicians and engineers?

50 x 27 x 30 = 40500 cc = 40.5 litres (plus a little more 'cos it's heaped up over the top edge a little in the middle), now you just need to work out the average volume of a cork under random stacking conditions where there is a large variation in cork size. :shock: :twisted:


What!!!! You want us to actually think about it - I thought we were supposed to be guessing :lol:

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:09 am
by grahamg
My Guess is 1479, 500 years before I was born...

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:34 am
by Wizz
Red Bigot wrote:I'm still waiting for the scientific approach to appear, where are all the mathematicians and engineers?

50 x 27 x 30 = 40500 cc = 40.5 litres (plus a little more 'cos it's heaped up over the top edge a little in the middle), now you just need to work out the average volume of a cork under random stacking conditions where there is a large variation in cork size. :shock: :twisted:


Mine had some pseudo science behind it, but you'll all see my method once I've patented it.. :-)

AB

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:38 am
by Deejay
I am using a slightly different scientific method - I have made a box of the same dimensions and now I am trying to drink 1500-2000 bottles of Red with a few bubblies to get the unequivocal answer. IT may take me a while but the experiment should be fun.

Dave