Page 2 of 4
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:07 pm
by GrahamB
Brian
My guess is
2168 corks
Graham
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:07 pm
by GrahamB
As we have been allowed two guesses then
2276
Graham
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:13 pm
by Daryl Douglas
I like the ones that are black at one end
!!!
The dimensions aren't those of a really big fishtank.
I reckon about 850.
daz
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:23 pm
by Andrew Jordan
Andrew,
1. I'm retired, I have plenty of time and it only happens about every 8-10 years. I broke it into batches and counted them into small containers so I wouldn't lose count too often, I did have to recount some batches.
As an accountant by trade, it is wonderful to see good auditing procedures in place.
2. These are only the corks with brands on them (not just the cork maker/batch), the non-branded ones go off for various good (so I'm told) uses. So you would have to at least double the number of bottles drunk, or at least tasted, though only a very small portion of tasting group wines make it into the tank. (It's more than your guess too.)
So what would this number be out of interest sake?
2nd guess for me
1,519 (marked corks).
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:26 pm
by alimunro
put me down for 2005
been lurking for a while - but this is the challenge I needed to make me register.
cheers,
al
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:28 pm
by Andrew Jordan
been lurking for a while - but this is the challenge I needed to make me register.
Brian,
The ploy worked!
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:31 pm
by Mal
Im going to go 1070
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:48 pm
by Vickie
Hi Brian,
Fingers crossed...
2404
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:54 pm
by Vickie
How about
2776?
Vickie
...this is excellent
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:05 pm
by camw
1) 1178
2) 1179
Thanks Brian.
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:54 pm
by platinum
1124 was my guess without a clue
So I will say 1070 which is 54 less than my first guess...Damn someone has covered that
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:57 pm
by Chuck
Second guess 1788.
Chuck
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:01 pm
by Davo
If we are second guessing, and I find people doing it to me every day, I would have to guess 1834
Thanks for the fun and I hope to help you get started on the next tank
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:05 pm
by Muscat Mike
Well Chief,
would you believe 1888
MM.
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:08 pm
by Christo
Brian,
have to say great respone 42 post thus far & 290 views...great ratio!
Amazing what a chance at a free bottle of wine will do!! ... & i'll bet we've all got excessive cellars as it is.
By the way, what happens if the wine is corked?!
c
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:47 pm
by jester
Brian,
1389
or
1228
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:50 pm
by Steve
1178!
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:15 am
by MartinJohnC
How about 2160 ?
Thanks Martin
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:38 am
by Serge Birbrair
second guess
2166
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:40 am
by Deejay
second guess 1711
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:48 am
by Red Bigot
alimunro wrote:put me down for 2005
been lurking for a while - but this is the challenge I needed to make me register.
cheers,
al
Welcome aboard Al, keep on posting now you have taken the plunge.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:49 am
by Red Bigot
I'll either give you your money back or give you John Glaetzer's address/fax number.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:19 am
by JohnP
First guess - 1952
Second guess - 1900
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:32 am
by Mike Hawkins
1864
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:41 am
by GrahamB
JohnP wrote:First guess - 1952
Second guess - 1900
John, I'm guessing a birth year here. But which one?
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:45 am
by Red Bigot
I'm still waiting for the scientific approach to appear, where are all the mathematicians and engineers?
50 x 27 x 30 = 40500 cc = 40.5 litres (plus a little more 'cos it's heaped up over the top edge a little in the middle), now you just need to work out the average volume of a cork under random stacking conditions where there is a large variation in cork size.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:56 am
by JohnP
Red Bigot wrote:I'm still waiting for the scientific approach to appear, where are all the mathematicians and engineers?
50 x 27 x 30 = 40500 cc = 40.5 litres (plus a little more 'cos it's heaped up over the top edge a little in the middle), now you just need to work out the average volume of a cork under random stacking conditions where there is a large variation in cork size.
What!!!! You want us to actually think about it - I thought we were supposed to be guessing
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:09 am
by grahamg
My Guess is 1479, 500 years before I was born...
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:34 am
by Wizz
Red Bigot wrote:I'm still waiting for the scientific approach to appear, where are all the mathematicians and engineers?
50 x 27 x 30 = 40500 cc = 40.5 litres (plus a little more 'cos it's heaped up over the top edge a little in the middle), now you just need to work out the average volume of a cork under random stacking conditions where there is a large variation in cork size.
Mine had some pseudo science behind it, but you'll all see my method once I've patented it..
AB
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:38 am
by Deejay
I am using a slightly different scientific method - I have made a box of the same dimensions and now I am trying to drink 1500-2000 bottles of Red with a few bubblies to get the unequivocal answer. IT may take me a while but the experiment should be fun.
Dave