So we're concluding about half the top tier of Langtons' classification isn't worthy?
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
On first view it would seem so although the thread question invites only negative opinions.GraemeG wrote:
So we're concluding about half the top tier of Langtons' classification isn't worthy?!
Craigphillisc wrote:Nearly all of Henschke![]()
![]()
Cheers Craig
My exposure to very old Burgundy is dropping off though I agree there are some amazing wines. I don't see as much of it these days as pricing is through the roof and there's a proliferation of fakes making sourcing critical.Ian S wrote:Hi Jamie
Sort of a similar experience, with me realising that I really don't enjoy young red Burgundy at all (whereas I can enjoy young nebbiolo wines). I have however experience those breath-taking moments with a couple of bottles bought at auction 1969 vintage, drunk less than a decade ago.
Long live the Grenaissance!Wizz wrote:Hi Ian, if you're interested, try some of the new Australians, particularly from McLaren Vale. They have my Burgundy/Barolo loving friends in thrall at the moment. S C Pannell, Yangarra, Vanguardist, Paralian come to mind right now. Ochota Barrels as well (RIP Taras). All dialling down the ripeness and oak significantly.Ian S wrote: Grenache - pretty much across the globe. Too often jammy upfront fruit and without the grip of tannin (or acidity) that could keep it balanced, nor enough complexity beyond that initial blast of fruit. I did once think that I liked it in Gigondas, until I found out the ones I liked had significant syrah in the blend
Cheers
Andrew
I agree with the sentiment regarding vfm in champagne/sparkling and just not getting about 80% of the wines I try. Ironically I've always liked moet whenever I've tried it and i think it good value at $30 a bottle.Ian S wrote: We're arguably the reverse, in getting this, but no other champagnes have excited us in the same way, with only a small few getting a begrudging "it's ok". We've had such poor value out of champagne, that we maybe buy / drink a bottle every two years or so. 5 bottles sit in the cellar, of varying age.
Could not agree more Jamie. I am quite active on Instagram, and every man and their dog seems to fret over Red Burgundy on their wine pages.JamieBahrain wrote:I've been fortunate enough to regularly drink Red Burgundy wine from most of the great producers. For the last 16 years a near weekly experience, whether a formal tasting or just a few bottles with friends. I've been guided through the region by top local collectors and friends who are importers for some of the most lauded producers. Whilst there have been some excellent wines, some even exceptional on occasion, I don't get the fuss. With prices having boomed beyond the reasonable, the myth has perpetuated with the masses. Pulling the cork on a fine Red Burgundy is a social media frenzy for many these days.
Anyways, Burgundy has been done to death. Wouldn't be sad to never have another bottle. Far more soulful wine regions about for mine.
The beauty about wine is it is subjective. I opened up a Mount Langi Ghiran Langi Shiraz 1998 for my 50th birthday this year, and it was sublime. My wine of the year.Mark Carrington wrote:Two that consistently underwhelm: Moss Wood Cab & Mount Langi Ghiran Shiraz.
No grudge Jamie, yep, over the journey coutesy of previous buys a long time ago and one or two friends who have very deep pockets, I have managed to taste a great many vintages. The pricing structure is outrageously stupid...beyond belief and after tasting 30 shirazes last week in the Valley, many as good or better than Mt Ed at 1/3 to 1/4 the price. Good luck to all those who can shell out $1400 for a sixer.JamieBahrain wrote:Craigphillisc wrote:Nearly all of Henschke![]()
![]()
Cheers Craig
You've written up the odd note praising Henschke shiraz I think I recall? You don't get the wines or is it just a continued grudge on their pricing?
My exposure to very old Burgundy is dropping off though I agree there are some amazing wines. I don't see as much of it these days as pricing is through the roof and there's a proliferation of fakes making sourcing critical.Ian S wrote:Hi Jamie
Sort of a similar experience, with me realising that I really don't enjoy young red Burgundy at all (whereas I can enjoy young nebbiolo wines). I have however experience those breath-taking moments with a couple of bottles bought at auction 1969 vintage, drunk less than a decade ago.
Old Rioja is the most consistent very old wine I've experienced from my time abroad- if we are looking at between 40-100 years. The small window of free availability of these wines probably gone now ( even 30's and 40's Rioja available at Spainish Michelin restaurants a decade ago for under a few hundred euros )
felixp21 wrote:50% of Burgundy is drunk too young.
45% of Burgundy is drunk too old.
That makes it a very expensive exercise. However, the 5% might just keep you hooked
I’m actually happy when people in general don’t like the wines I like. It minimises the demand pressure on price! Riesling is Exhibit A....sjw_11 wrote:felixp21 wrote:50% of Burgundy is drunk too young.
45% of Burgundy is drunk too old.
That makes it a very expensive exercise. However, the 5% might just keep you hooked![]()
![]()
... so add in lets say 5% corked ... and geez you better hope that one bottle you got the timing right, wasn't the one that was corked!
I have really enjoyed reading this thread. I am always intrigued by different tastes, and this just again affirms for me something I constantly bang on about with people who don't yet know wine - never listen to anyone who tells you there is a single and only "right" answer to what is good!
I appreciate the suggestions. Definitely happy to taste and the increased structure sounds like there may be hope yet that I'd like them!Michael McNally wrote:Long live the Grenaissance!Wizz wrote:Hi Ian, if you're interested, try some of the new Australians, particularly from McLaren Vale. They have my Burgundy/Barolo loving friends in thrall at the moment. S C Pannell, Yangarra, Vanguardist, Paralian come to mind right now. Ochota Barrels as well (RIP Taras). All dialling down the ripeness and oak significantly.Ian S wrote: Grenache - pretty much across the globe. Too often jammy upfront fruit and without the grip of tannin (or acidity) that could keep it balanced, nor enough complexity beyond that initial blast of fruit. I did once think that I liked it in Gigondas, until I found out the ones I liked had significant syrah in the blend
Cheers
Andrew
Agree with Wizz here Ian. Aussie Grenache is now lighter, more aromatic and has more structure. I second Yangarra and Vaguardist and add Aphelion and Dodgy Bros.
Agree about Orange wine as mentioned elsewhere in the thread.
Cheers
Michael
Where does premox fit infelixp21 wrote:50% of Burgundy is drunk too young.
45% of Burgundy is drunk too old.
That makes it a very expensive exercise. However, the 5% might just keep you hooked
One of the comments of the year!Rossco wrote:Where does premox fit infelixp21 wrote:50% of Burgundy is drunk too young.
45% of Burgundy is drunk too old.
That makes it a very expensive exercise. However, the 5% might just keep you hooked
.... in the "too old" categoryRossco wrote:Where does premox fit infelixp21 wrote:50% of Burgundy is drunk too young.
45% of Burgundy is drunk too old.
That makes it a very expensive exercise. However, the 5% might just keep you hooked
DIAM has brought me back to some producers..the ones I will still buy w/ cork are ones that I have found to have fewer premox issues..felixp21 wrote: WRT premox, there are now a considerable number of Producers that have gone to diam (Leflaive, Chartron) or screwcap (Michelot et al). I still purchase White Burgundy, but my purchases are limited only to those that do not seal with cork.