I was suggesting that corks are obsolete technology, that is all. Thankfully an ever-shrinking proportion of the world's wines are sealed with an inferior 'quality grade' closure, which seems almost impervious to achieving modern food-grade standards of performance.Benchmark wrote:In the context that almost all cars still run a carburettor and all the great TV's are CRT's and fuel injection is untested and flatscreen TV's are not available and.... well nothing like it. What an abstract comparison.GraemeG wrote:This is like reading about projects to improve the carburettor, or CRT televisions.
Seems to be a serious amount of angst and petulance surrounding an important topic.
It's not like the forum is awash with discussion and this is cluttering more important issues.
Any attempts at improvement, or claims of improvement are worth of discussion. Whether through the lens of the cork/screw cap debate or entirely independent of them.
(Compare to the bottle the wine comes in, for example - inert, reliable - just what you want in food-grade packaging.)
This would all be of no real import, except that most of the world's very best wines still use corks!
But then these wines are also very expensive, and usually made in very limited quantities considering the demand. And a couple-of-% failure rate isn't really an issue for those who can afford them; perhaps they're not that expensive after all.
It's nice that Amorim are still trying to improve their 19th-century closure, even if it only means they're admitting it's still not of acceptable quality!
No angst or petulance, just looking at the facts!
Graeme