Ego is taking over what this forum was all about so Please keep it to your Cellar Delights
Regards Dazza
Mahmoud Ali wrote:In 2004 I tried another bottle (with a backup wine at the ready) but, lo and behold, the fruit was back and the wine was rich and complex with much more moderate tannins. It was lovely. The wine had been dormant for all this time. Now I have 2 bottles of the '82 Tahbilk left and I plan on serving it blind to people who continue to think that Australian wine, particularly the Shiraz, don't age. As mentioned in another post I have friends who think that the current crop of Australian wines don’t age, that the ’98s are already on the downward slope. Perhaps its true for some of the fruit bomb, high alcohol wines. Time will tell.
I presume by your Ribbet Red reference you are referring to French wines and not the Dan Murphy wine that I used to see when I was there in 2006/7. Well, like you I like to keep my wine purchases in the budget realm and I realize it is difficult in Australia to find good French wines in the budget category. But let me tell you that a 1997 Moss Wood tasted in 2001 was a Bordeaux look alike right from the bouquet. If the more reasonably priced French wines were available in Australia you too might like them. Just a thought.
Cheers…………………Mahmoud.
Bick wrote:Blue wrote:0.05% NZ(1 bottle of cat piss (sav blanc) and 1 bottle of pinot noir, for "people i dont like")
Hilarious
Blue wrote:I just love burgundies...
Maybe you should try some more new world pinot then rather than slate it - some of its quite good.
Mahmoud Ali wrote:Blue,
I too would love to be able to afford DRC, Leroy, etc. but 85% Burgundy and only 1% Italy and no Spain, Germany, Chile, Argentina.........?
What do your friends drink and how do you serve a "mystery" wine?
Mahmoud
Craig(NZ) wrote:Bick
You should know what type of personalities have 85% of Burgundy in their cellars. Dont go there, ignore. They will always look down on the rest of us uneducated people.
Those who can't enjoy a good sauvignon blanc seem blessed with the same personalities too according to my thorough and scientific research
Blue wrote:Craig(NZ) wrote:Bick
You should know what type of personalities have 85% of Burgundy in their cellars. Dont go there, ignore. They will always look down on the rest of us uneducated people.
Those who can't enjoy a good sauvignon blanc seem blessed with the same personalities too according to my thorough and scientific research
No, I do NOT look down. To be honest, i don't care. For your information, i still drink a lot of NZ and other new world pinots for educational purposes. I just don't cellar them.
Some people in this forum don't even drink white wines. Do not mean they look down on people who do drink white wines.
Posting histories and reputation proves that you are more opinionated and patriotic about NZ wines. And about what other people drink, compare to most other posters. Serge Birbair aside, he is still numero uno
No, I can't drink sav blanc. It will ruin my dinner or my drinking session. Not even Sancerre, but thats just me. I will drink beer anyday over sav blanc, honest!! Please kindly describe my personality according to your thorough and scientific research.
Some people in this forum don't even drink white wines. Do not mean they look down on people who do drink white wines.
Posting histories and reputation proves that you are more opinionated and patriotic about NZ wines
No, I can't drink sav blanc. It will ruin my dinner or my drinking session. Not even Sancerre, but thats just me. I will drink beer anyday over sav blanc, honest!! Please kindly describe my personality according to your thorough and scientific research.
Serge Birbair aside, he is still numero uno
Please kindly describe my personality according to your thorough and scientific research.
Blue wrote:My cellar:
85% Burgundy
10% Bordeaux
1% Italian,mostly Barolos
1% German Rieslings
2.95% Australian
0.05% NZ(1 bottle of cat piss (sav blanc) and 1 bottle of pinot noir, for "people i dont like")
Favourite bottles:
Bonneau du Martray CC 91,93,96,99,00,02,04,05
Domaine Levlaive, Ramonet, Coche Dury 1er and GCs
Bouchard Montrachet 02
Bouchard Chevalier Montrachet 02,04,05
Bouchard CC 02,04,05
Rousseau Chambertin 83,84,85,95,96,98,99,01,02,03,04,05, magnums of 98,02
Rousseau Chambertin Clos de Beze 84,98,99,01,02,03,04,05, magnums of 02
Rousseau Clos st Jacques 96,98,99,05 magnums of 05
Rousseau Clos de Ruchottes 90,98,01
other Rousseaus
JF Mugnier Musigny 02,03,05
de Vogue Bonnes Mares 02,04,05, magnum of 02
de Vogue Musigny 05
DRC la Tache 01
DRC Richebourg 98
I just love burgundiesNeed to work a lot harder to be able to afford any DRC and Leroys
maybe never!!
rooman wrote:Blue wrote:My cellar:
85% Burgundy
10% Bordeaux
1% Italian,mostly Barolos
1% German Rieslings
2.95% Australian
0.05% NZ(1 bottle of cat piss (sav blanc) and 1 bottle of pinot noir, for "people i dont like")
Favourite bottles:
Bonneau du Martray CC 91,93,96,99,00,02,04,05
Domaine Levlaive, Ramonet, Coche Dury 1er and GCs
Bouchard Montrachet 02
Bouchard Chevalier Montrachet 02,04,05
Bouchard CC 02,04,05
Rousseau Chambertin 83,84,85,95,96,98,99,01,02,03,04,05, magnums of 98,02
Rousseau Chambertin Clos de Beze 84,98,99,01,02,03,04,05, magnums of 02
Rousseau Clos st Jacques 96,98,99,05 magnums of 05
Rousseau Clos de Ruchottes 90,98,01
other Rousseaus
JF Mugnier Musigny 02,03,05
de Vogue Bonnes Mares 02,04,05, magnum of 02
de Vogue Musigny 05
DRC la Tache 01
DRC Richebourg 98
I just love burgundiesNeed to work a lot harder to be able to afford any DRC and Leroys
maybe never!!
I have to admit I do love burgundy. fortunately i have never really mastered the stuff hence my cellar is a little more balanced. I am however interested in the Rousseau you have, is it really that much more constant or just plain better than other houses (forget the DRC and LeRoy sideline). Is the Clos de Beze a big jump in quality over the standard Chambertin?
monghead wrote:rooman wrote:
I have to admit I do love burgundy. fortunately i have never really mastered the stuff hence my cellar is a little more balanced. I am however interested in the Rousseau you have, is it really that much more constant or just plain better than other houses (forget the DRC and LeRoy sideline). Is the Clos de Beze a big jump in quality over the standard Chambertin?
Is the Rousseau Chambertain not above the Clos de Beze in the Rousseau pecking order???
Blue wrote:monghead wrote:rooman wrote:
I have to admit I do love burgundy. fortunately i have never really mastered the stuff hence my cellar is a little more balanced. I am however interested in the Rousseau you have, is it really that much more constant or just plain better than other houses (forget the DRC and LeRoy sideline). Is the Clos de Beze a big jump in quality over the standard Chambertin?
Is the Rousseau Chambertain not above the Clos de Beze in the Rousseau pecking order???
Yeah, Rousseau Chambertin is above Clos de beze. Some years(rare), Clos de Beze is actually better than Chambertin. To be honest, if you blind taste me it will be difficult to tell which is which.
Rousseaus wines(for me) are just very consistent, even for bad years(especially Grand Crus). I never had a bad Rousseau, unless corked. We had a 1983 Chambertin a few months ago with Phillip Jones. We were very impressed with the wine, 1983 is a bad year, rot! Not for his Chambertin, not a sign of rot. I'd personally have a bad year Chambertin for a much lesser price than a good year les-Cazetiers or even Mazis and Charmes-Chambertin.
With DRC and Leroy, I just can't imagine the price of Rousseau's Chambertin if le Chambertin is as small(land size) as La Tache, Musigny, Richebourg or even Romanee Conti. For me, i like Rousseau better than Leroy, but DRC......No, maybe Musignys!! No, stuff all that, my true weakness and love is le Montrachet!!!!
Daryl Douglas wrote:Hmmm, labels and egos seem inevitably drawn to each other.
Blue wrote:Daryl Douglas wrote:Hmmm, labels and egos seem inevitably drawn to each other.
True, true, so does unaffodability and jealousy![]()
Nothing worse than no label and high ego though...![]()
Just like cars, some people happy with a toyota corolla or camry, they won't see the point of driving a Porsche or Aston Martin, will they? No, i dont own a Porsche or Aston, hopefully one day.
dave vino wrote:Lock me in for the car Eddie. I'd rather a nice car over a wine any day.
Nothing like giving it in 2nd gear and feeling the wiggle and lane drift as the car fights for traction and then hitting a bend and powering out of it.
In an ideal world I'd be sipping my Rockford BP while trying to not upset the glass winding my way around the GOR Rain Forest section in a M3/GT2/SL65 with some Wagner blaring out on the stereo.
hmmm wrote:dave vino wrote:Lock me in for the car Eddie. I'd rather a nice car over a wine any day.
Nothing like giving it in 2nd gear and feeling the wiggle and lane drift as the car fights for traction and then hitting a bend and powering out of it.
In an ideal world I'd be sipping my Rockford BP while trying to not upset the glass winding my way around the GOR Rain Forest section in a M3/GT2/SL65 with some Wagner blaring out on the stereo.
M3/GT2/SL65, ho hum... i guess like a lot of wines... can have so much more for so much less.
hmmm wrote:dave vino wrote:Lock me in for the car Eddie. I'd rather a nice car over a wine any day.
Nothing like giving it in 2nd gear and feeling the wiggle and lane drift as the car fights for traction and then hitting a bend and powering out of it.
In an ideal world I'd be sipping my Rockford BP while trying to not upset the glass winding my way around the GOR Rain Forest section in a M3/GT2/SL65 with some Wagner blaring out on the stereo.
M3/GT2/SL65, ho hum... i guess like a lot of wines... can have so much more for so much less.
dave vino wrote:Lock me in for the car Eddie. I'd rather a nice car over a wine any day.
Nothing like giving it in 2nd gear and feeling the wiggle and lane drift as the car fights for traction and then hitting a bend and powering out of it.
In an ideal world I'd be sipping my Rockford BP while trying to not upset the glass winding my way around the GOR Rain Forest section in a M3/GT2/SL65 with some Wagner blaring out on the stereo.
Blue wrote:hmmm wrote:dave vino wrote:Lock me in for the car Eddie. I'd rather a nice car over a wine any day.
Nothing like giving it in 2nd gear and feeling the wiggle and lane drift as the car fights for traction and then hitting a bend and powering out of it.
In an ideal world I'd be sipping my Rockford BP while trying to not upset the glass winding my way around the GOR Rain Forest section in a M3/GT2/SL65 with some Wagner blaring out on the stereo.
M3/GT2/SL65, ho hum... i guess like a lot of wines... can have so much more for so much less.
M3/GT2/SL65 naturally come with nice bottles of wines, no?
hmmm wrote:Blue wrote:hmmm wrote:dave vino wrote:Lock me in for the car Eddie. I'd rather a nice car over a wine any day.
Nothing like giving it in 2nd gear and feeling the wiggle and lane drift as the car fights for traction and then hitting a bend and powering out of it.
In an ideal world I'd be sipping my Rockford BP while trying to not upset the glass winding my way around the GOR Rain Forest section in a M3/GT2/SL65 with some Wagner blaring out on the stereo.
M3/GT2/SL65, ho hum... i guess like a lot of wines... can have so much more for so much less.
M3/GT2/SL65 naturally come with nice bottles of wines, no?
yes... but they do shout "look at my $$$ and my no sense of original taste in cars" and in the case of windy forest driving $400,000 (is that how much a GT2 costs!!!![]()
) buys you a slower and more cumbersome car than say the new GTR and your definitely paying more than twice as much for it... i do think the SL65 is a very nice car, (well the black series SL65 anyway)...
Blue wrote:
I have to disagree, sorry. I dont know about GT2(dont really like it) but I'll take a GT3, Aston Martin or even a standard 911 over GTR. For the same money of GT2, Murcielago. Slower yes, but they look so much better than GTR in my opinion. Yes they do shout look at my $$$, but i guess i'll buy it for me to enjoy more than anything. What you'd rather have?A more demanding or even a bit high maintenance good looking wife or the not so good looking one who does the job or a little bit better.![]()
So much for a "cellar delight" topic....