James, your comments on Foster's actions with the McLaren Vale growers are "interesting" and if as stated, reprehensible.
As far as Rosemount being an $8 brand, that's all the low end wines have been worth for years.

Ian S wrote:One thing that does worry me about Seppeltsfield is Fosters references to tourism being key. Most tourist operations are pretty horrificly low in the quality stakes and I just can't see this working myself. Maybe they're thinking of introducing an admission charge like I recently heard about in the US (US$25 no less!).
TORB wrote:Ian S wrote:One thing that does worry me about Seppeltsfield is Fosters references to tourism being key. Most tourist operations are pretty horrificly low in the quality stakes and I just can't see this working myself. Maybe they're thinking of introducing an admission charge like I recently heard about in the US (US$25 no less!).
Ian,
There is no doubt the tour will cost money; in fact I think a tour and tasting may already cost now.
TORB wrote:Ian S wrote:One thing that does worry me about Seppeltsfield is Fosters references to tourism being key. Most tourist operations are pretty horrificly low in the quality stakes and I just can't see this working myself. Maybe they're thinking of introducing an admission charge like I recently heard about in the US (US$25 no less!).
Ian,
There is no doubt the tour will cost money; in fact I think a tour and tasting may already cost now.
marsalla wrote:You can mention all the 'rejuvenated' seppelts lines you like, but in reality those lines would be less than 1000 tonnes production, with limited opportunity to grow.
marsalla wrote:I think anyone who thinks Seppelts Great Western wont be chopped is kidding themselves. I have heard they are doing less than half the intake last vintage than they were a few years ago. There are big empty sheds that are full of nothing. My tip is they will drive the brand down through neglect. You can mention all the 'rejuvenated' seppelts lines you like, but in reality those lines would be less than 1000 tonnes production, with limited opportunity to grow. Not many grower contracts being renewed in victoria, and the glenlofty vineyard is about to be sold.
Red Bigot wrote:chillwrx wrote:I recently visited seppelt great western and the staff new nothing of the seppeltsfield sale and have concerns for their own positions. I was unable to get any further info but perhaps more communication from Fosters to their staff might be appropriate.
What if they divested themselves of Great Western too? Are sales of Salinger and irregular vintages of Show reserve Sparkling shiraz that proiftable![]()
I understand that they only make those two wines now and occasionally crush for Karadoc when busy. Given the reasons for selling seppeltsfield, great Western is not safe.
???![]()
![]()
![]()
I think Gt Western is pretty safe, it's home of the boom St Peters, Chalambar, Moyston, Victoria level, Benno and the Original Sparkling Shiraz (plus a few whites, both still and sparkling, from limited runs to bulk stuff), Seppelts Victoria is one of the standout examples of how to successfully run a sub-business within a larger organisation by finding someone with the talent and drive to do it properly. Truly a jewel in the crown and a great turnaround story over the past 5 years or so.
chillwrx wrote:The ST Peters vineyard is there but the wines are only crushed at Great Western and bottled made elsewhere. The only wines made completely at GW are Show reserve Sparkling and Salinger. All others are made elsewhere now according to Seppelt Staff.
By the rationale that has seen Seppeltsfield sold GW is not safe.
chillwrx wrote:
The ST Peters vineyard is there but the wines are only crushed at Great Western and bottled made elsewhere. The only wines made completely at GW are Show reserve Sparkling and Salinger. All others are made elsewhere now according to Seppelt Staff.
By the rationale that has seen Seppeltsfield sold GW is not safe.