terroir...shmorour...the EUREKA moment.

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

Chow Chow wrote:Common Serge,
Saw ur "troll" on the French's over @ WLDG.
How come ur palate took a sudden detour?


my troll was more about marketing than taste,
marketing subject I know, taste I was lacking and never hid that fact on WLDG. My "palete detour" is caused by drinking wines recomended by some WT members (my access in Florida is kinda limited to French juice)
http://www.nocomments.com/1/Paris05/index4.html
http://www.nocomments.com/1/Paris05/index5.html
http://nocomments.com/1/NYC05/index2.html
and..there is NO DETOUR here,
just another facet added to the diamond of knowlege. I still enjoy my frit bombs and that was the first bottle I opened after being back from France...I missed my "tutti-fruity"
;)

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

bigkid wrote:At the risk of exposing my lack of experience, if it is just about the soil then how can vintages of the same wine from the same vineyard taste so different from one year to the next??

Regards,

Allan


it is NOT all about the soil....weather is equally important factor. Don't be afraid to expose the lack of expereince, folks here bark but don't bite the heads off. (at least on the board, I wouldn't wanna meet TORB in the bar brawl with his chair raised above my head :)

I expose my lack of expereince and I learn something,
I think I know it all and I learn nothing.

"He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever."

I personally don't mind to be a fool for 5 mins.

User avatar
bigkid
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:06 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by bigkid »

Serge,

Got a bit relentless there for a while - you're a braver man than I.

Allan

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

bigkid wrote:Serge,

Got a bit relentless there for a while - you're a braver man than I.

Allan


Allan,
being brave always worked for me. (except the stock market :)

TORB
Posts: 2493
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: Bowral NSW
Contact:

Post by TORB »

Serge wrote:
TORB,
1) what credibility are you talking about????



Serge,

When a person make bold statements, and everyone disagrees with them, and they offer not one is shred of fact to back up your statement, then frankly they don't have much credibility.

Is this a scientific symposium?
Are we making earth shuttering discoveries here?
c'mon, thius is a BEVERAGE we are talking about here,
NOTHING more and your attempt of taking ourselves WAY to serious is ruining the moment...mostly for you
:)



No, this is not as scientific symposium, but when people make bold statements, and they are challenged on them, they avoid answering questions posed, or provide any basis of facts for their statements, I will continue to point out the shortcomings of their arguments. If I want to take wine way to seriously, that's my business.

don't turn into an academia, you take all fun out of drinking process
:)


There is a big difference between turning it into academia and sorting the fact for the bovine manure. There is a huge difference between the "fun of the drinking process" and statements and that are made go against all conventional wisdom and knowledge.

2) What reality are you talking about? YOUR reality is not MY reality,
and in a FREE SOCIETIES everybody is entitled to their own realities,
especialy in the realities where the scientific facts and formulas are at miss. NONE of us can prove our SUPPOSITIONS with mathematic formulas, therefore,
MY supposition is as good as yours, or you'd prove me wrong 10 posts ago with FORMULAS, but we both know you can't....


Two points here. Firstly, in a post to Mark, you actually asked him to provide "care to post the link to the SCIENTIFIC STUDIES of the subject so I could read it and the truism."

Secondly on one hand, you are asking for scientific studies and on the other, you are saying that scientific facts and formulas in relation to this are not provable. Thats a big hole, you can't have it both ways.

The only conclusion I can draw from this is that either logic fails to get through to you, or you are a windup merchant, and if it's the latter, I will treat your posts in a manner consistent with the quality of the posts.

In terms of proving you incorrect 10 posts ago, for a start, I have asked you specific and direct questions which you have failed to answer. I have directly challenge statements you've made as been factually incorrect, and you have failed to answer those too. I have made numerous comments to back my position, but all you have done is avoided the logical debate. Secondly, if you wish to be blinded by "your own reality" obviously you are welcome to do so.

The fact that every single person who has contributed this thread basically disagrees with you obviously will not change your mind, because you have made it up already, and despite everyone providing numerous reasons why they think you are wrong, you will continue to believe what you will believe.

3) As for Degrees, I have an Electrical Engineer Degree in High Voltage Transmission lines. Will you take for granted everything I say about the effects on vineyards the high voltage transmission lines have? It would be foolish, to say politely, if you do.


Correct, I think you have adequately proved the value of your input.

4) as for posting facts:
if you get me the funding,
$220,000,000 US would be enough,
I'll conduct the study on the root level and post my findings....I bet there is a reason NONE has been done so far ....winemaking is not an exact science.


Part of that is probably the most accurate thing you've said "winemaking is not an exact science" but whilst there is awful lot is not known, there is one hell of a lot that is!
Cheers
Ric
TORBWine

Chow Chow
Posts: 204
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Location: Sepang - the Hottest F1
Contact:

Post by Chow Chow »

WOW! I'm impressed Ric. Considering "LAW" as ur next proffession :?: :wink:
Purple Tongue

TORB
Posts: 2493
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: Bowral NSW
Contact:

Post by TORB »

Serge wrote:
I expose my lack of expereince and I learn something,
I think I know it all and I learn nothing.

"He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever."

I personally don't mind to be a fool for 5 mins.


There is no one as deaf as someone who refuses to hear and no one who is so blind as someone who refuses to see.

On one hand, you say you want to learn but on the other when a position based on logic is presented, you just stick to an intrenched position and your answer goes off on tangents.
Cheers
Ric
TORBWine

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

TORB wrote:
Serge wrote:
I expose my lack of expereince and I learn something,
I think I know it all and I learn nothing.

"He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever."

I personally don't mind to be a fool for 5 mins.


There is no one as deaf as someone who refuses to hear and no one who is so blind as someone who refuses to see.

On one hand, you say you want to learn but on the other when a position based on logic is presented, you just stick to an intrenched position and your answer goes off on tangents.


TORB,
you talk well, but do you HEAR what I say?

I said it before in previous posts and I'll say it again JUST FOR YOU:
Secondary,
this might not have come clear, but what I basically was reffering and fascinated by was the metamorphosis the wine was going thru, as the minerals contained in it were getting AERATION and how it changed in the mouth in time/space continuum


I guess the post I made originally made perfect sense to me with CONJUNCTION of my first wine orgasm post.


and if YOU, TORB,
can prove me WRONG that the wine metamorphosis and resulting orgasm in the mouth in conjuncture with food was caused by OTHER factors than the minerals in the soil,
please state your case and I'll be taking down YOUR arguments with immerse pleasure.

shoot.

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

Serge,

When a person make bold statements, and everyone disagrees with them, and they offer not one is shred of fact to back up your statement, then frankly they don't have much credibility.


and what should I do when the entire world disagrees with me? Shoot myself or join those who believe that the Earth is flat? THAT was a popular and wide spread opinion for many years. TORB, you taking it way to personal, which is of course your God's given right,
but you won't drag me into it, sorry, it takes a bit more than your posts
;)

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

There is a big difference between turning it into academia and sorting the fact for the bovine manure. There is a huge difference between the "fun of the drinking process" and statements and that are made go against all conventional wisdom and knowledge.


"conventional wisdom and knowledge" 50 years ago was that the French make the best wines in the World, and we both KNOW that that conventional wisdom and knowledge ain't worth 3 cents coin today.

therefore, the argument is weak, at best, to say politely.

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

Two points here. Firstly, in a post to Mark, you actually asked him to provide "care to post the link to the SCIENTIFIC STUDIES of the subject so I could read it and the truism."

Secondly on one hand, you are asking for scientific studies and on the other, you are saying that scientific facts and formulas in relation to this are not provable. Thats a big hole, you can't have it both ways.


TORB,
once again you have failed to HEAR me, and YES, I can have it BOTH ways because I know, and you know and HE knows,
there are no studies he can stick in my eye,
therefore, asking for waht can't be delivered IS having it both ways, as you put it
:)

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

The only conclusion I can draw from this is that either logic fails to get through to you, or you are a windup merchant, and if it's the latter, I will treat your posts in a manner consistent with the quality of the posts.


Damn, now I am really upset, will pack my toys and leave your sand box! and you are correct in a way,
I USED to be a "windup" merchant,
I was in the marketing before retirement.

You don't wanna have a dialoge, you wanna have a monolog with me
doing
Image
I am afraid I am not cut up for that....sorry, Sire.

TORB
Posts: 2493
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: Bowral NSW
Contact:

Post by TORB »

Serge,

Interesting chain of events.

TORB,
you talk well, but do you HEAR what I say?

I said it before in previous posts and I'll say it again JUST FOR YOU:
Secondary,
this might not have come clear, but what I basically was reffering and fascinated by was the metamorphosis the wine was going thru, as the minerals contained in it were getting AERATION and how it changed in the mouth in time/space continuum


Sorry, I miss read it, what your first post said was
"Than we started tasting wines...wines which evolved with ever sip...and it became VERY clear...
The REASON why the French wines are so evolving is:
terroir, not the climate, not the rains, not the barrels, but the SOIL itself!
RICH with minerals which find it's way into the grape, and when oxydized, produce all those flavors nobody else can produce or duplicate."


In that post, your word; you have stated terroir, climate and rain is is not important, the minerals in the soil itself is the most important factor. Thats is all this debate is about. The rest are all side issues.

As for stating I don't want to have a dialogue with you, I want to have a mologue; I think I have answered every point you have raised, if that is not a dialogue, what is?

TORB,
once again you have failed to HEAR me, and YES, I can have it BOTH ways because I know, and you know and HE knows,
there are no studies he can stick in my eye,
therefore, asking for waht can't be delivered IS having it both ways, as you put it


Interesting; I am reasonably sure there are wine studies going on all over the world that I know nothing about, but I do not profess to know everything. When I was in McLaren Vale recently, by accident I found out about a whole reseach arm that was funded by jointly by Oz growers, the government and the CSIRO that had was doing research into things I could not spell, let alone understand. The budget is in the millions of $, so its not small potatoes, or grapes in this case.

and what should I do when the entire world disagrees with me? Shoot myself or join those who believe that the Earth is flat? THAT was a popular and wide spread opinion for many years. TORB, you taking it way to personal, which is of course your God's given right,


How do you know what I am or am not feeling? Engaging in a rational debate does not mean that one has to take it personally.

Accusing me of being a believer of the flat earth society is astounding. Your origional premise, unless I have failed to spot it, is that you have dismissed the effect of "terroir, the climate, the rains, the barrels"; and have stated that the major reason that French wine is great is because it all revolves around the soil. I am stating it takes more than just the soil to make those wines great; note I am not dismissing the role of the sole, but I am saying it is one factor in many. Now if that is flat earth thinking, then I am guilty.

In one of your last posts you now state
and if YOU, TORB,
can prove me WRONG that the wine metamorphosis and resulting orgasm in the mouth in conjuncture with food was caused by OTHER factors than the minerals in the soil, ....


You have now moved the goal posts. In the initial post, it was the soil alone, now it has become the soil with the addition of food. And I have to prove you wrong.

No one is disputing you had a wine orgasm.

What I am disputing is that it the sole (or even the main) reason the wine is great is because of the soil the grapes are grown in -- even leaving aside the influence of food. My contention is there are a number of factors that make a wine great and you cannot just isolate one.

As to my proving it, you have decided to dismiss other peoples posts on this subject as well as my thoughts.

"conventional wisdom and knowledge" 50 years ago was that the French make the best wines in the World, and we both KNOW that that conventional wisdom and knowledge ain't worth 3 cents coin today.


Another interesting comment. Firstly, 50 years ago when that statement was made, it was correct! Secondly, whilst many other countries are making some great wines today, the top French wines are still regarded by many as some of the best wine in the world. That does not mean that ll French wine is great, they do make a lot of swill, but then so does a lot of other countries.

And as far as being in marketing, does having been the International Marketing Director for one of the worlds largest computer software companies count?
Cheers
Ric
TORBWine

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

And as far as being in marketing, does having been the International Marketing Director for one of the worlds largest computer software companies count?


I don't know without seeing the results and yearly charts of profitability.

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

Sorry, I miss read it, what your first post said was Quote:
"Than we started tasting wines...wines which evolved with ever sip...and it became VERY clear...
The REASON why the French wines are so evolving is:
terroir, not the climate, not the rains, not the barrels, but the SOIL itself!
RICH with minerals which find it's way into the grape, and when oxydized, produce all those flavors nobody else can produce or duplicate."


In that post, your word; you have stated terroir, climate and rain is is not important, the minerals in the soil itself is the most important factor. Thats is all this debate is about. The rest are all side issues.


This is my fault,
as I wasn't clear from the start what I meant. I now fully understand your reaction,
we had a communication problem.

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

You have now moved the goal posts.


not really...we were just playing different games, I played "American Football" and you played European one
:)

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

What I am disputing is that it the sole (or even the main) reason the wine is great is because of the soil the grapes are grown in -- even leaving aside the influence of food. My contention is there are a number of factors that make a wine great and you cannot just isolate one.


Now YOU opened another can of worms...
what IS a "great wine"? I personally consider my fruit bombs GREAT WINE,
and some do NOT. ...and I'll NEVER expect everybody agree with me on definition what "greatness" is, it's a VERY personal hallmark.


As to my proving it, you have decided to dismiss other peoples posts on this subject as well as my thoughts.


not true....I NEVER dismiss my opponents, I might not agree with statements, but I NEVER DISMISS,
especially opponents like you and posters of this board,
whom I find HEADS above e-Bobbers.....either I agree or not. Aussies have class and straightforwardness many snobs are missing.

TORB
Posts: 2493
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: Bowral NSW
Contact:

Post by TORB »

Serge wrote:
And as far as being in marketing, does having been the International Marketing Director for one of the worlds largest computer software companies count?


I don't know without seeing the results and yearly charts of profitability.


Serge,

This is symtomapic of the whole problem. For a start, it was a rhetorical question and although I stated something that was quantifiable and factual, you elected not to believe what I have said and asked for proof. Why question don't you believe me, or don't you believe anything I say, or possibly this is just a game?

This is my fault,
as I wasn't clear from the start what I meant. I now fully understand your reaction,
we had a communication problem.


At last, we getting somewhere!

Now YOU opened another can of worms...
what IS a "great wine"? I personally consider my fruit bombs GREAT WINE,
and some do NOT. ...and I'll NEVER expect everybody agree with me on definition what "greatness" is, it's a VERY personal hallmark.


Serge, you are doing it again! Down another sidetrack!! If you wish to take what I have said and take it off on a tangent, then that's fine, but don't accuse me of opening a can of worms. The reason that I make this point is simple. How can a wine give you an orgasm, if it is not great? It doesn't matter what anyone else thinks of it, the fact is the world moved for you, so by definition, as far as you are concerned, it must be a great wine.
Cheers
Ric
TORBWine

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

TORB wrote:
Serge, you are doing it again! Down another sidetrack!! If you wish to take what I have said and take it off on a tangent, then that's fine, but don't accuse me of opening a can of worms. The reason that I make this point is simple. How can a wine give you an orgasm, if it is not great? It doesn't matter what anyone else thinks of it, the fact is the world moved for you, so by definition, as far as you are concerned, it must be a great wine.


TORB,
to end this thread:
I am not accusing you of anything! P E R I O D.

As for Greatness.....let's forget about wine for a second and go back to the term orgasm. I'm sure not all orgasms of your life were delivered by great women....I know mine weren't. End of story
:)

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

P.S. my wife just peaked over my shoulder and agrees with me fully-
according to her, only SHE is great
:)

TORB
Posts: 2493
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: Bowral NSW
Contact:

Post by TORB »

Serge,

I too will end this thread, frankly I have difficulty in following your reasoning.

eg:

Serge - Now YOU opened another can of worms...

Ric - ......but don't accuse me of opening a can of worms.

Serge - I am not accusing you of anything! P E R I O D.
Cheers
Ric
TORBWine

Serge Birbrair

Post by Serge Birbrair »

it wasn't an acusation, that was a compliment on using the same tactics you credited me with
:)

you haven't get used to compliments much have you?
:)

lines from the movie "Trading Places"

...Randolph - Mother always said you were greedy.

..Mortimer - She meant it as a compliment

:)

Post Reply