I love those!Mivvy wrote:All I can see there is AOC Bourgogne Dave - I thought Polymer only drank Cali and Oregon Chardonnay???
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
We love them because they're similar to Burgundy
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Its cold here but now I feel like a Chardy...
I love those!Mivvy wrote:All I can see there is AOC Bourgogne Dave - I thought Polymer only drank Cali and Oregon Chardonnay???
Just to clarify, that wasn't in reference to Polymer's post, it was in reference to Felix's post.dave vino wrote:Not sure about that, Polymer has shared all of these bottles with me, so he has an inkling of all the highs and lows. I daresay he has had way, way more than me at this level. I'm just a happy chappy who is able to go along for the ride when circumstances allow.JamieBahrain wrote:So what Felix is saying, is many contemporary drinkers who say all roads lead to Burgundy, haven't even drunk the really good wines. They probably just read about them.![]()
We are in disagreement and just to clarify, I wasn't talking of supermarket Bourgogne, I was inclusive of right up and beyond Leroy etc.Polymer wrote:But generic whatever from a small no name no reputation producer...its pretty bad..it also sells for sub 10 EUR. I don't see a point with this though...all regions have mostly crap wine (by volume) and probably everyone on this board, as educated wine drinkers, drink in that top 5% or even 1%.
Not what I'm sayingJamieBahrain wrote:Sorry Ian. All roads lead to Burgundy.
G'day Felix.felixp21 wrote:Not sure that gets you too many cru Italian wines!!!
Still agree with this despite various interpretations emerging of "All Roads Lead To Rome/ All Roads Lead To Burgundy". A pretty clear assumption and to be honest the first time I heard this used was years ago and All Roads Lead To Bordeaux.Michael McNally wrote: The general malignment and implied snobbery of some who say "yes, your journey will start with Shraz, but will end up with Burgundy" gives me the $hitS.
+1 ConCon J wrote:I'm not following what we are trying to prove here anymore.![]()
Cheers Con.
After reading the post prior to yours I can well understand what you mean. Hilarious.Con J wrote:I'm not following what we are trying to prove here anymore.
That you aren’t a bogan to drink SA shiraz.Con J wrote:I'm not following what we are trying to prove here anymore.![]()
Cheers Con.
Well umm yes Sam...nobody has had a fight yet...but not sure how a Shiraz thread turned into a pisstake regarding pinot and cabernet and roads and really wealthy people??!!sjw_11 wrote:I think this is one of the very rare threads (debates) where Jamie, Mahmoud, Craig and I are all in alignment.
Oh dear, and I had thought, without taking an extreme view of either side, that I was leaning slightly towards Polymer's position in defending the broad meaning behing the all roads lead to notion. It just goes to show how convoluted this thread has become.sjw_11 wrote:I think this is one of the very rare threads (debates) where Jamie, Mahmoud, Craig and I are all in alignment.
No worries, it's all in jest.sjw_11 wrote:Haha OK false alarm, my bad.
All good SamMahmoud Ali wrote:No worries, it's all in jest.sjw_11 wrote:Haha OK false alarm, my bad.
Cheers ........................ Mahmoud.