TNs: 1982 and 1983 Wolf Blass Black (major surprises)

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
Baby Chickpea
Posts: 582
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 12:17 pm

TNs: 1982 and 1983 Wolf Blass Black (major surprises)

Post by Baby Chickpea »

Some forgotten remnants discovered in my bi-annual cellar clear out for Langton's (clearing the decks of all pre-1990 vintage Aussie wines, excepting the 1986s and icon wines like Grange and Hill of Grace).

Both wines were genuine surprises given I was anticipating heavily vanilla oaked monsters and under-ripe green wine that so typifies Aussie cabernets from this decade (as has been my experience). Even now I can hear the Aussie wine forum critics sniggering the same sentiment about Wolf Blass Black Label wines. But the proof is in the bottle. The corks were like brand new and the bottle fill levels had hardly budged (levels remained 1cm from the cork) – extraordinary for Aussie wines that are over 20 years old. Although I stopped buying Black Label around the 1990 vintage, I may have to reconsider (despite style changes). And the wines were far beyond the typical one-dimensional trait exemplified by most of the wines made in this era (tasted 10-20 years later).

<b>1982 Wolf Blass Black Label</b>
75% cabernet from Langhorne Creek, 25% shiraz from the Barossa and Clare Valley. Mid red colour with slight hints of brown at the edge. Excellent given its age. The nose is exceptional – still cascades with aromas of sweet perfumed berries, just a hint of green but little oak density. Far superior nose to the 83 Black Label. Lovely wine too on the palate and fully mature. The distinct lack of a long length was the only major negative. Much softer and plusher than the 83. Good balance with little tannins left. Quite dry but very easy to drink. Holding up well.
<b>Very Good 17.5 / 20</b>

<b>1983 Wolf Blass Black Label</b>
12% alcohol. 80% cabernet from Langhorne Creek and Clare Valley, 20% merlot from McLaren Vale and Langhorne Creek. Mid red again with no brown and brighter than the 82 (superior clarity). The bouquet is almost quintessential classic Bordeaux – cedar, ash, prunes. But also much greener than the 82 (capsicum) and more secondary vegetative flavours, but certainly not disconcerting or unappealing. The wine tastes like the 82 Black but with added increments of intensity and concentration. None of the capsicum evident here like on the nose. Yes, there is slight taste of spicy oak but this augments the wine and is not in any way prominent. Lovely balance and fills out the palate well. Tannins well integrated, and the length is very good. An all round excellent wine that is mature with balance, weight and a seamless binary taste of primary and evolved characters. The 20-year-old cork looks one year old – only ~10% soaked! 2nd day – no difference. The length is the only real shortcoming but a good effort all round. One of the very best 1983 cabernets I have had from Australia.
<b>Excellent 18.0 / 20</b>
Danny

The voyage of discovery lies not in finding new landscapes but in having new eyes. We must never be afraid to go too far, for success lies just beyond - Marcel Proust

User avatar
markg
Posts: 1313
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 5:25 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Post by markg »

Thanks for those notes Danny, really helpful !
Cheers
-Mark Wickman

WICKMAN'S FINE WINE AUCTIONS
FREE membership, LOWEST auction commissions in Australia.
Now accepting wine for our next auction.
http://www.wickman.net.au

Twitter: @WickWine
YouTube: WickWineAuction

User avatar
Attila
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:50 am
Location: Maroubra-Sydney
Contact:

Post by Attila »

I've drunk the 1983 back in the mid 90's. I remember the appealing softness and balance but it is a fact that the wine finished short. Still, it was quite nice. We've drunk the whole bottle with a friend and we thought that towards the end it lacked excitement. Somehow, we thought, everything that wine had to offer, it offered it in the first glass.
Good to see that you had a bottle in superb condition after all these years.
Cheers,
Attila

David Lole

Post by David Lole »

Danny,

And the 1981 Black Label I tried a couple of years ago (served masked) blew me away, and then some more when its' identity was revealed. I won a bottle at auction recently for a little over 30 bucks with a terrific fill level. Will post a note here once opened. Thanks for your fine notes, as always.

Baby Chickpea
Posts: 582
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 12:17 pm

Post by Baby Chickpea »

Agree on the 81 WB Black David - a top wine when i last had it in the late 90s. I too have one bottle left. Geez $30 is a bargain - I thought thge 1981-1986 Blacks were goin for around $50$70. You might have some competition in the future at these prices .... :wink:
Danny

The voyage of discovery lies not in finding new landscapes but in having new eyes. We must never be afraid to go too far, for success lies just beyond - Marcel Proust

Jakob
Posts: 149
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Sydney City

Post by Jakob »

I've had the Jimmy Watson winning 1975 and the 1976 over the last 18 months, and have to say that the wines have had an amazing depth and weight both times, though I'd agree that the lenght hasn't been overly impressive. A little 'four square' perhaps, but great value - thankfully the prices don't seem to have risen in the same way as other wines of the same quality :D Can't wait to try the good vintages from the 1990's once they're ready!

David Lole

Post by David Lole »

Baby Chickpea wrote:Agree on the 81 WB Black David - a top wine when i last had it in the late 90s. I too have one bottle left. Geez $30 is a bargain - I thought thge 1981-1986 Blacks were goin for around $50$70. You might have some competition in the future at these prices .... :wink:


Thanks Danny, I appreciate your fine sense of comradeship. :roll:

Post Reply