05 Hill of Grace vs 05 Grange

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
graham
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 8:24 pm
Location: Brisbane

05 Hill of Grace vs 05 Grange

Post by graham »

Have heard on the grapevine :lol: that the Hill is something special.
Any views on how these two will stack up against each other?

graham
Nothing is so effective in keeping one young and full of lust as a discriminating palate thoroughly satisfied at least once a day.

User avatar
Craig(NZ)
Posts: 3246
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Craig(NZ) »

not sure how they will stack against each other. All i know is at the prices they are asking neither of them will be stacking in my cellar
Follow me on Vivino for tasting notes Craig Thomson

User avatar
Waiters Friend
Posts: 2775
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 4:09 am
Location: Perth WA

Post by Waiters Friend »

Craig(NZ) wrote:not sure how they will stack against each other. All i know is at the prices they are asking neither of them will be stacking in my cellar


Ditto. Last time I bought Grange was the 1990, which cost me the staggering price of $130 a bottle.
Wine, women and song. Ideally, you can experience all three at once.

Mike Hawkins
Posts: 2747
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am

Post by Mike Hawkins »

Graham,

When I spoke to Peter Gago, he indicated the 2004 Grange is the one to look out for. I'll be buying more of it than the 2005.

OTOH, The 2005 Mt Ed is better than its 2004 counterpart, so I'm guessing the same may hold true with HOG.

I guess that doesn't exactly answer your question - sorry.

Mike

User avatar
Rawshack
Posts: 377
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:19 pm
Contact:

Post by Rawshack »

Craig(NZ) wrote:not sure how they will stack against each other. All i know is at the prices they are asking neither of them will be stacking in my cellar


Ha ha, good post and my sentiments exactly.
The Dog of Wine

Paullie
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:46 pm

Post by Paullie »

Agreed Craig.

JamieH
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 8:05 pm
Location: Brisbane, Aus

Post by JamieH »

if your going to spend the money, buy the Hill of Grace always. Imo a beautifully crafted single vineyard shiraz. i too have heard 2005 is something special from Stephen and Prue!

Cheers

Jamie
Lets just say I have never had a wine I've hated, but there are some I would rather not taste again....

Jay60A
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:01 pm
Location: Richmond, Surrey

Post by Jay60A »

JamieH wrote:if your going to spend the money, buy the Hill of Grace always. Imo a beautifully crafted single vineyard shiraz. i too have heard 2005 is something special from Stephen and Prue!

Cheers

Jamie


There was a WineState vertical of Grange vs HOG a few years back from about the 1980 up to about the 1994(?) vintage which is when Henschke were making great wines. I've mislaid the mag but the tasters were Steve and Pru Henschke, Tim ??? (Adams or Knappstein) and Peter Gago, John Duval. It made fascinating reading. The wines were scored non-blind with detailed TNs from everyone and points. Generally Grange had the edge with I think the 1990 and 1986 Granges leading the pack, then maybe the HOGs from those two vintages. I remember that one of the Penfolds winemakers (Peter Gago I think) loved the 1991 Grange and rated it above all others (19.5/20).

I've drunk a single Grange (1990 though!) and no HOGs so I'm unqualified to answer. But I'd rather have 4-5 bottles of say RWT 1999, or 4-5 bottles of Edelstone 04/05 than a single Grange or HOG so I have to agree with Craig also ...
“There are no standards of taste in wine. Each mans own taste is the standard, and a majority vote cannot decide for him or in any slightest degree affect the supremacy of his own standard". Mark Twain.

JamieH
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 8:05 pm
Location: Brisbane, Aus

Post by JamieH »

Jay60a
I would probably take 5-6 of the super seconds too (not that rich) and most would probably vote for grange as a better wine across decades. i'm just a single vineyard nut when it comes to super premium wines and i think (this will probably get me in trouble) Grange is a cheat!

Feeling my ears burning now.

Cheers

Jamie
Lets just say I have never had a wine I've hated, but there are some I would rather not taste again....

User avatar
griff
Posts: 1906
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Sydney

Post by griff »

JamieH wrote:Jay60a
I would probably take 5-6 of the super seconds too (not that rich) and most would probably vote for grange as a better wine across decades. i'm just a single vineyard nut when it comes to super premium wines and i think (this will probably get me in trouble) Grange is a cheat!

Feeling my ears burning now.

Cheers

Jamie


But Jamie. Have you tried Grange? Not trying to say it is worth the money but it can be fantastic wine and there is a reason it is king of the Australian heap.

cheers

Carl
Bartenders are supposed to have people skills. Or was it people are supposed to have bartending skills?

JamieH
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 8:05 pm
Location: Brisbane, Aus

Post by JamieH »

Carl,
i've tried ,89, 92,96,99 and 2001 all outstanding wines, the 1996 will probably still be in my top 50 wines of my life when i die. My beef is, Penfolds take the best fruit from Mclaren vale, coonawarra and barossa (this is just the 2003 vintage), within these regions multiple vineyards. with all this access to some of the most expensive and supposedly best fruit in south australia it should be spectacular, year in year out, which it usually is. Only for me, its still cheating, my idea of a true fine wine is not a blend of fruit from a whole state, but at the very least 1 region. all the other icon wines of the world i can think of come from one region at the very least. it would like to see penfolds produce grange all from Barossa fruit or even better a single vineyard, just for one year. all of this is just my opinon though, like i said i'm a big single vineyard fan.
Lets just say I have never had a wine I've hated, but there are some I would rather not taste again....

User avatar
griff
Posts: 1906
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Sydney

Post by griff »

JamieH wrote:Carl,
i've tried ,89, 92,96,99 and 2001 all outstanding wines, the 1996 will probably still be in my top 50 wines of my life when i die. My beef is, Penfolds take the best fruit from Mclaren vale, coonawarra and barossa (this is just the 2003 vintage), within these regions multiple vineyards. with all this access to some of the most expensive and supposedly best fruit in south australia it should be spectacular, year in year out, which it usually is. Only for me, its still cheating, my idea of a true fine wine is not a blend of fruit from a whole state, but at the very least 1 region. all the other icon wines of the world i can think of come from one region at the very least. it would like to see penfolds produce grange all from Barossa fruit or even better a single vineyard, just for one year. all of this is just my opinon though, like i said i'm a big single vineyard fan.


That is well considered opinion then. Tried some great Granges there. Would like to try the 99 actually but haven't come across it.

I guess I am less romantic in that for me a fine wine is what is in the glass in front of me :)

cheers

Carl
Bartenders are supposed to have people skills. Or was it people are supposed to have bartending skills?

Jay60A
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:01 pm
Location: Richmond, Surrey

Post by Jay60A »

griff wrote:
JamieH wrote:Carl,
i've tried ,89, 92,96,99 and 2001 all outstanding wines, the 1996 will probably still be in my top 50 wines of my life when i die. My beef is, Penfolds take the best fruit from Mclaren vale, coonawarra and barossa (this is just the 2003 vintage), within these regions multiple vineyards. with all this access to some of the most expensive and supposedly best fruit in south australia it should be spectacular, year in year out, which it usually is. Only for me, its still cheating, my idea of a true fine wine is not a blend of fruit from a whole state, but at the very least 1 region. all the other icon wines of the world i can think of come from one region at the very least. it would like to see penfolds produce grange all from Barossa fruit or even better a single vineyard, just for one year. all of this is just my opinon though, like i said i'm a big single vineyard fan.


That is well considered opinion then. Tried some great Granges there. Would like to try the 99 actually but haven't come across it.

I guess I am less romantic in that for me a fine wine is what is in the glass in front of me :)

cheers

Carl


Show you how great the terroir is for Latour, Margaux etc. They are making tens of thousands of cases of the stuff from a single site.

Just a thought ... Wonder what a Latour-Margaux blend would be like?
:shock:
“There are no standards of taste in wine. Each mans own taste is the standard, and a majority vote cannot decide for him or in any slightest degree affect the supremacy of his own standard". Mark Twain.

User avatar
griff
Posts: 1906
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Sydney

Post by griff »

Jay60A wrote:
griff wrote:
JamieH wrote:Carl,
i've tried ,89, 92,96,99 and 2001 all outstanding wines, the 1996 will probably still be in my top 50 wines of my life when i die. My beef is, Penfolds take the best fruit from Mclaren vale, coonawarra and barossa (this is just the 2003 vintage), within these regions multiple vineyards. with all this access to some of the most expensive and supposedly best fruit in south australia it should be spectacular, year in year out, which it usually is. Only for me, its still cheating, my idea of a true fine wine is not a blend of fruit from a whole state, but at the very least 1 region. all the other icon wines of the world i can think of come from one region at the very least. it would like to see penfolds produce grange all from Barossa fruit or even better a single vineyard, just for one year. all of this is just my opinon though, like i said i'm a big single vineyard fan.


That is well considered opinion then. Tried some great Granges there. Would like to try the 99 actually but haven't come across it.

I guess I am less romantic in that for me a fine wine is what is in the glass in front of me :)

cheers

Carl


Show you how great the terroir is for Latour, Margaux etc. They are making tens of thousands of cases of the stuff from a single site.

Just a thought ... Wonder what a Latour-Margaux blend would be like?
:shock:


And what about bit of Hermitage in the mix? :D

cheers

Carl
Bartenders are supposed to have people skills. Or was it people are supposed to have bartending skills?

JamieH
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 8:05 pm
Location: Brisbane, Aus

Post by JamieH »

Jay60a wrote-
Show you how great the terroir is for Latour, Margaux etc. They are making tens of thousands of cases of the stuff from a single site.

Just a thought ... Wonder what a Latour-Margaux blend would be like?

Now wouldn't that be interesting, a five first growth blend, called the Bordeaux, 8) if only we of the the normal world could every hope to try it.

Jamie
Lets just say I have never had a wine I've hated, but there are some I would rather not taste again....

Post Reply