Value for money - a hypothetical question

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply

$500 to spend at Penfolds

1 Btl of Grange
4
7%
3 Btls of Bin 707
3
5%
4 Btls of RWT
13
22%
5 Btls of Yattarna
0
No votes
6 Btls of Magill Estate
3
5%
1 Case of Bin 389
13
22%
1.5 Cases of Bin 407
0
No votes
2 Cases of Bin 28 (or 128)
3
5%
4 Cases of Koonunga Hill
0
No votes
8 Btls St Henri
20
34%
 
Total votes: 59

tonsta
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Adelaide

Value for money - a hypothetical question

Post by tonsta »

G'day all,

Someone recently asked me whether I would pay $500 for a bottle of Grange. I said that it was all relative to what you could afford.

Not many of you would dispute Grange is a top drop, but if I gave you $500 to spend at the Penfolds Cellar Door what would you choose - assuming a good vintage (refer Poll)?

:lol: Just a bit of fun! :P

Tony

fred
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:35 pm

Post by fred »

I voted for the case of 389 but your choices are slightly odd both as to numbers and as to omissions:-

eg for the latter I would have chosen say 8 bottles of St Henri!

tonsta
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Adelaide

Post by tonsta »

fred wrote:I voted for the case of 389 but your choices are slightly odd both as to numbers and as to omissions:-

eg for the latter I would have chosen say 8 bottles of St Henri!


OOPS...Sorry Fred I forgot about the St Henri! I will try to add it

What is odd about the numbers? they are only supposed to be a ball park estimate i.e. not exactly to the dollar.

Tony

fred
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:35 pm

Post by fred »

Well general basis is that Grange won't be discounted much but

RWT circ $110-120 pb

magill will come to around $80 pb

St Henri to $60

389 to $35-8

kalimna to $17

based on recent vintages.

That will give me for $500,
around

4+RWT (but <5)
6 Magill
8 St Henri
13 389
29 kalimna...

...so being unkind the poll may be flawed by taking into account the additional 'non-optimal exchange rate'!

regards

User avatar
roughred
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: ALBURY

Post by roughred »

Nothing flawed about it...the numbers stack up pretty well to me...I took the 707

Alex F
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:45 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Alex F »

I took the 389 as well... although I would have preferred the St Henri...

User avatar
Wayno
Posts: 1633
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 6:31 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Post by Wayno »

62.75 bottles of Rawsons Retreat for me.
Cheers
Wayno

Give me the luxuries of life and I will willingly do without the necessities.

User avatar
Partagas
Posts: 493
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Perth

Post by Partagas »

Took 707 easy but would definitely choose St Henri over all of them.

Ratcatcher
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:01 pm
Location: Hobart

Post by Ratcatcher »

I chose the RWT assuming it's 1998 or 2002 standard.

I would have taken St H if it had been in the poll.

My preference would have been 1 x RWT, 3 x St H and the remainder in 389.

Red Red Wine
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:55 pm

Post by Red Red Wine »

I would choose the case of 389.

tonsta
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Adelaide

Post by tonsta »

Ratcatcher wrote:I would have taken St H if it had been in the poll.

Hi Ratcatcher

I tried to update the poll to include the St Henri but I couldn't.

Tony

User avatar
Gavin Trott
Posts: 1860
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:01 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Post by Gavin Trott »

tonsta wrote:
Ratcatcher wrote:I would have taken St H if it had been in the poll.

Hi Ratcatcher

I tried to update the poll to include the St Henri but I couldn't.

Tony


I added it

Vote away.

BTW I would take the St Henri too!
regards

Gavin Trott

GraemeG
Posts: 1737
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:53 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by GraemeG »

I arrived late enough to catch the new poll, so 8 St H it is! And it mirrors real life, since it is the most numerous Penfolds wine in my cellar. (technically equal with 389, but I'm likely to buy some 04 Henri, whereas I've passed on 389 since the 98 vintage.)
cheers,
Graeme

User avatar
griff
Posts: 1906
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Sydney

Post by griff »

I was a 389 vote but the St Henri would be the pick (just hope no Foster's ppl will use this poll to increase prices)

cheers

Carl
Bartenders are supposed to have people skills. Or was it people are supposed to have bartending skills?

Gary W
Posts: 993
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 10:41 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by Gary W »

AFAIK all the prices will be going up significantly next vintage anyway...
GW

Damo961
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:24 am
Location: Canberra

Post by Damo961 »

They already have in my local dan's.
or at least stopped being 'discounted'
Their regular price on Bin 389 has gone up $8 in the last 2 months or so.
with similar sorts of increases across most of the penfolds range.

Was in the Barossa on the weekend and the cellar door rrp is 51.90 for the 389 :shock:

User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Post by Red Bigot »

Damo961 wrote:They already have in my local dan's.
or at least stopped being 'discounted'
Their regular price on Bin 389 has gone up $8 in the last 2 months or so.
with similar sorts of increases across most of the penfolds range.

Was in the Barossa on the weekend and the cellar door rrp is 51.90 for the 389 :shock:


VC single bottle price is $52.99.

It's possible I'll never buy another Penfolds red to cellar, maybe the odd bottle to try, there are too many alternatives that attract me at present.
That would definitely be the end of an era of drinking Penfolds reds that started for me about 40 years ago. :-(
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)

seanwines
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:17 pm

Post by seanwines »

In the Poll, you might have given another option. Spending the $500 on a wine other than penfolds!

I would never buy any of their wines.

For your information: They still had some Grange for sale at CD a few weeks ago.

Damo961
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:24 am
Location: Canberra

Post by Damo961 »

Red Bigot wrote:VC single bottle price is $52.99.

It's possible I'll never buy another Penfolds red to cellar, maybe the odd bottle to try, there are too many alternatives that attract me at present.
That would definitely be the end of an era of drinking Penfolds reds that started for me about 40 years ago. :-(


I think I'm about to go the same way.
I have half a dozen of the 04 389 from before the price rise and they may be my last for quite some time.
The value for money just isn't there anymore

And at the cellar door - while the staff were friendly - a tasting line-up that stops at 389 really isn't good enough.
Sure you can pay for a premium tasting. But at Torbrek for example a $5 fee gets you a full flight tasting - including 5 wines between $125 and $225
And they said the fee was really only to discourage freeloaders - it obviously doesn't go anywhere close to covering the cost.

Penfolds seem all corporate marketing these days. and there are plenty of other guys out there just trying to make good wine.

User avatar
KMP
Posts: 1246
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 4:02 am
Location: Expat, now in San Diego, California
Contact:

Post by KMP »

GraemeG wrote:I arrived late enough to catch the new poll, so 8 St H it is! And it mirrors real life, since it is the most numerous Penfolds wine in my cellar. (technically equal with 389, but I'm likely to buy some 04 Henri, whereas I've passed on 389 since the 98 vintage.)
cheers,
Graeme


Ditto, it would be St Henri for me and with the price around $35USD I could get a dozen for the $500, but I only ever get a six-pack of each vintage. So with the extra $250USD I might buy a bottle of Grange or not.

Mike

Barney
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 1:15 pm
Location: Little Hampton

Post by Barney »

Damo961 wrote:
Red Bigot wrote:VC single bottle price is $52.99.

It's possible I'll never buy another Penfolds red to cellar, maybe the odd bottle to try, there are too many alternatives that attract me at present.
That would definitely be the end of an era of drinking Penfolds reds that started for me about 40 years ago. :-(


I think I'm about to go the same way.
I have half a dozen of the 04 389 from before the price rise and they may be my last for quite some time.
The value for money just isn't there anymore

And at the cellar door - while the staff were friendly - a tasting line-up that stops at 389 really isn't good enough.
Sure you can pay for a premium tasting. But at Torbrek for example a $5 fee gets you a full flight tasting - including 5 wines between $125 and $225
And they said the fee was really only to discourage freeloaders - it obviously doesn't go anywhere close to covering the cost.

Penfolds seem all corporate marketing these days. and there are plenty of other guys out there just trying to make good wine.


Have more Penfolds reds than any other brand by far including all those mentioned above, with recent discounting have always found them pretty good VFM. This will change over the next few years if the price increases become a reality, I think they will struggle with volumes if they increase prices too much. Is it possible the are banking on an increase in prices across the board in the next year or so as a result of decreased yields ?.

User avatar
Craig(NZ)
Posts: 3246
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Craig(NZ) »

I think I'm about to go the same way.
I have half a dozen of the 04 389 from before the price rise and they may be my last for quite some time.
The value for money just isn't there anymore


I bought most of my 2004 389 for NZ$27, one for NZ$30 and one for NZ$10.

Amazing how price for St Henri has rocketed in Australia. Seen it for $80+ there. Its not a very trendy wine in NZ and I see it reasonably regularly on special at under $50. I have never spent over $50 on a St Henri.

Personally assuming a good vintage (ie 94,96,98 or 04) id go the case of 389 (or 9x 389 and 2x st henri)
Follow me on Vivino for tasting notes Craig Thomson

User avatar
n4sir
Posts: 4020
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 10:53 pm
Location: Adelaide

Post by n4sir »

It's a bit dependent on the particular vintages of the wines being offered too - normally St Henri would be the go for me, but with the current release (2003) I would opt for something else (in order of preference, 2004 Bin 707, RWT, Magill Estate then Bin 389).

I still nominated St Henri as that would normally be my pick, but that could change in future if there's even further significant price hikes in store next year.

Cheers,
Ian
Forget about goodness and mercy, they're gone.

platinum
Posts: 301
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:09 am

Post by platinum »

Ratcatcher wrote:I chose the RWT assuming it's 1998 or 2002 standard.

.


Ditto

Though I think from the 04 vintage its not easy to find it at $125 Aud anymore.

I would consider paying $50 for 389 if its in the class of the 96 in future but I highly doubt it.

I would take a single bottle of Bin 60A over a single Grange anyday and its available still for just under $500.

How much are the wines expected to go up by?

monghead
Posts: 1769
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 10:28 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by monghead »

Hi guys,

Had to vote the Grange, as it is still the best Australian red I have had by a long shot. It's ability to keep, and drinkability 30+ years on, even in sub-standard vintages eg '77, make it an easy decision.

Cheers,

Monghead

User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Post by Red Bigot »

platinum wrote: I would consider paying $50 for 389 if its in the class of the 96 in future but I highly doubt it.


I tried a bottle of the 2005 Bin 389 at the NWS, a half-empty bottle from judging made it to lunch. I'm not sure what score/medal it got, but to me it's a very good wine, showing good fruit richness and impeccable balance/backbone, it could be the best since 98 and maybe up there with the 96. It is certainly the most immediately satisfying 389 I've tried since the 98, all the others have left niggling doubts about fruit, acid, balance, structure, this one hit all the right spots, nothing out of place.

Whether it's worth $50+ or even a $40 street price is up to personal preference, I'll try it again on release and decide then.
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)

Post Reply