TV: Couple of Bin 389s and a couple of Old Blocks (Longish)
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:22 pm
Hi All
In winter a man's thoughts turn to red wine and so these 4 wines were knocked off over a couple of nights:
Penfolds Bin 389 1996 & 1998
Both really great examples of Bin 389 (which in my opinion has shown some real variability in the last little while). These 2 are certainly up there with the best. The 1996 is clearly the superior wine, wonderfully integrated and developing some lovely meaty secondary characteristics. However, what I liked was that it still tasted fresh and vibrant. It's not getting old as such and really showed no signs of deterioration at all. It has it all: fruit, tannin, acid and they all come together to make it such a well balanced wine with a long, delicious finish. Not going to rush to drink my remaining 6 as I think it will develop a bit further but it's hard to resist right now. Best of the marque I've ever tasted.
The 1998 was certainly more youthful and in your face, the tannins in particular became a bit trying towards the end of the bottle, but a few more years should soften them up. However, I don't think a couple of years in the cellar will help it match the 1996. There's lots of nice fruit there to be sure and it is big beautiful wine but it just doesn't have the je ne sais quoi of the 1996. I have 11 left and am delighted at the prospect of drinking them over the next 5-10 years but I wish I had 11 more of the 1996 instead.
St Hallett Old Block 1999 & 2002
A couple of absolute rippers and great winter warmers (it was -47C with the windchill the night I opened the 1999!!)and a comparatively balmy (!!!) -21C tonight when I opened the 2002).
Is Old Block one of the best value super-premium Barossa shiraz? On this evidence, I'd say a resounding yes! Given the recent rise in the Canadian dollar I picked the 2002 up for only $38 a bottle (the 1999 cost me $45 about 2 years ago) and I think this makes it simply outstanding value.
The 1999 was the better wine simply because it has had more time to integrate. An absolutely delicious mouthful of chocolate and blueberries but again the key was balance. It's a powerful wine but I found no signs of palate fatigue emerging as we demolished the bottle. Smooth tannins, luscious ripe fruit but with enough acidity to avoid that nasty cloying effect that I find with some of its peers. Could have easily drunk a second bottle.
I have 5 of these left and will leave a couple to develop further. The other 3 will be drunk when the mood takes me simply beacuse I haven't enjoyed a red as much as this in a while. A great wine at the height of its powers. More proof that ther 1999 vintage for Barossa shiraz is seriously under-rated and in many respects is vastly superior to the much vaunted 1998. Yummo!
The 2002 was a different proposition. Took a sniff and it almost blew my head off..massive nose of fruit, alcohol and mint. First mouthful had a similar effect, heaps of ripe fruit but serious dose of mouth-puckering tannins. This really is a monster. Decided to decant again and leave it for a few hours in a dark place to allow it to calm down a bit. Which it did. This is going to be a classic. The overwhelming flavour I got was milk chocolate, really fine milk chocolate, but with hints of pepper and mint. Even after several hours it was a massive wine. Much harder work than the 1999 but promises ever so much. Glad I tried this as my local outlet still has boxes of this left and I think another 6 pack will find it's way into my cellar. Great wine but needs a lot of time. I won't be touching another for 4 or 5 years at least methinks.
It's drinking wines like the 4 described above that remind me why I love Australian wine. Despite my flirtations with allegedly more refined and definitely more expensive Eurostuff I find these wines so much more fun to drink and invariably more pleasurable. Also, every time I finish a bottle and it's minus a million celsius outside I try to remember exactly why it was I left Australia!!
Cheers
Martin
In winter a man's thoughts turn to red wine and so these 4 wines were knocked off over a couple of nights:
Penfolds Bin 389 1996 & 1998
Both really great examples of Bin 389 (which in my opinion has shown some real variability in the last little while). These 2 are certainly up there with the best. The 1996 is clearly the superior wine, wonderfully integrated and developing some lovely meaty secondary characteristics. However, what I liked was that it still tasted fresh and vibrant. It's not getting old as such and really showed no signs of deterioration at all. It has it all: fruit, tannin, acid and they all come together to make it such a well balanced wine with a long, delicious finish. Not going to rush to drink my remaining 6 as I think it will develop a bit further but it's hard to resist right now. Best of the marque I've ever tasted.
The 1998 was certainly more youthful and in your face, the tannins in particular became a bit trying towards the end of the bottle, but a few more years should soften them up. However, I don't think a couple of years in the cellar will help it match the 1996. There's lots of nice fruit there to be sure and it is big beautiful wine but it just doesn't have the je ne sais quoi of the 1996. I have 11 left and am delighted at the prospect of drinking them over the next 5-10 years but I wish I had 11 more of the 1996 instead.
St Hallett Old Block 1999 & 2002
A couple of absolute rippers and great winter warmers (it was -47C with the windchill the night I opened the 1999!!)and a comparatively balmy (!!!) -21C tonight when I opened the 2002).
Is Old Block one of the best value super-premium Barossa shiraz? On this evidence, I'd say a resounding yes! Given the recent rise in the Canadian dollar I picked the 2002 up for only $38 a bottle (the 1999 cost me $45 about 2 years ago) and I think this makes it simply outstanding value.
The 1999 was the better wine simply because it has had more time to integrate. An absolutely delicious mouthful of chocolate and blueberries but again the key was balance. It's a powerful wine but I found no signs of palate fatigue emerging as we demolished the bottle. Smooth tannins, luscious ripe fruit but with enough acidity to avoid that nasty cloying effect that I find with some of its peers. Could have easily drunk a second bottle.
I have 5 of these left and will leave a couple to develop further. The other 3 will be drunk when the mood takes me simply beacuse I haven't enjoyed a red as much as this in a while. A great wine at the height of its powers. More proof that ther 1999 vintage for Barossa shiraz is seriously under-rated and in many respects is vastly superior to the much vaunted 1998. Yummo!
The 2002 was a different proposition. Took a sniff and it almost blew my head off..massive nose of fruit, alcohol and mint. First mouthful had a similar effect, heaps of ripe fruit but serious dose of mouth-puckering tannins. This really is a monster. Decided to decant again and leave it for a few hours in a dark place to allow it to calm down a bit. Which it did. This is going to be a classic. The overwhelming flavour I got was milk chocolate, really fine milk chocolate, but with hints of pepper and mint. Even after several hours it was a massive wine. Much harder work than the 1999 but promises ever so much. Glad I tried this as my local outlet still has boxes of this left and I think another 6 pack will find it's way into my cellar. Great wine but needs a lot of time. I won't be touching another for 4 or 5 years at least methinks.
It's drinking wines like the 4 described above that remind me why I love Australian wine. Despite my flirtations with allegedly more refined and definitely more expensive Eurostuff I find these wines so much more fun to drink and invariably more pleasurable. Also, every time I finish a bottle and it's minus a million celsius outside I try to remember exactly why it was I left Australia!!
Cheers
Martin