Block 6 2003 Gone By Friday
-
- Posts: 3754
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 7:40 am
- Location: Fragrant Harbour.
Block 6 2003 Gone By Friday
Just a heads up for those hoping to get their 3 bottles of Block 6- it will be gone by Friday.
Scuttlebutt from CD staff yesterday.
Not available for tasting however the Coriole Llloyd Reserve 02 up the road is.
Scuttlebutt from CD staff yesterday.
Not available for tasting however the Coriole Llloyd Reserve 02 up the road is.
- Gavin Trott
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:01 pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Contact:
Re: Block 6 2003 Gone By Friday
JamieBahrain wrote:Just a heads up for those hoping to get their 3 bottles of Block 6- it will be gone by Friday.
Scuttlebutt from CD staff yesterday.
Not available for tasting however the Coriole Llloyd Reserve 02 up the road is.
Yes
Very small vintage they tell me, well, that's certainly reflected in my retailer allocation.
regards
Gavin Trott
Gavin Trott
I always think six each of the Block 6 and Hillside is a bit meagre for such excellent wines but three each - ouch. My order went in yesterday as soon as I arrived home from two weeks holiday.
Both of these labels are very consistent avoiding the large ups and downs of vintages. The 2000 of both are top notch despite the vintage, they really do have their sites and viticulture well nailed at Kay's.
Both of these labels are very consistent avoiding the large ups and downs of vintages. The 2000 of both are top notch despite the vintage, they really do have their sites and viticulture well nailed at Kay's.
Cheers - Steve
If you can see through it, it's not worth drinking!
If you can see through it, it's not worth drinking!
-
- Posts: 3754
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 7:40 am
- Location: Fragrant Harbour.
Thank you for the tip. Order is in.
Re: Specials - the 2001 Cabernet for $15 per bottle looks great value.
The oak is the same species as French but from the Balkans, not French forests.
Adair
Re: Specials - the 2001 Cabernet for $15 per bottle looks great value.
Only had the one Noon but I feel that the fruit is not allowed to hang as long as it is done at Noon. I like it better at Kay's.Anonymous wrote:Never had a Kays. Is it an individual style or flavour & how do they compare to Noons? I know the Oak used is unusual.
The oak is the same species as French but from the Balkans, not French forests.
Adair
Wine is bottled poetry.
- Gavin Trott
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:01 pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Contact:
Adair wrote:Thank you for the tip. Order is in.
Re: Specials - the 2001 Cabernet for $15 per bottle looks great value.Only had the one Noon but I feel that the fruit is not allowed to hang as long as it is done at Noon. I like it better at Kay's.Anonymous wrote:Never had a Kays. Is it an individual style or flavour & how do they compare to Noons? I know the Oak used is unusual.
The oak is the same species as French but from the Balkans, not French forests.
Adair
regarding the oak treatment, the 'Balkan' oak is only a component of the oak treatment, there's French and American also.
Also, it is my understanding that the balkan oak comes from the same forest as much of the French oak, simply 'over the border'.
The above information is, I think, correct, from what they told me while barrel tasting at Kays!
regards
Gavin Trott
Gavin Trott
Anonymous wrote:Never had a Kays. Is it an individual style or flavour & how do they compare to Noons? I know the Oak used is unusual.
Nope, not individual, it's just damn good stuff. Hard to compare anything to Noons, now they are individual!
Get onto Kays, you won't be disappointed.
Cheers - Steve
If you can see through it, it's not worth drinking!
If you can see through it, it's not worth drinking!
Let's not get too excited by European oak from places other than France. For most of the cold war there were far more French barrels made than French oak trees cut to make them
One of the keys to oak I understand is the climate they grow in, colder climates produce slower growing trees which produce tighter grained oak, tight grain being seen as a positive.
Therefore whole swathes of the colder parts of Europe are good for sourcing oak. There's nothing special about French forests, it's just that they were the traditional source.
I remember when I first started drinking wine that German oak was common, haven't heard of it lately, must be all cut down?
One of the keys to oak I understand is the climate they grow in, colder climates produce slower growing trees which produce tighter grained oak, tight grain being seen as a positive.
Therefore whole swathes of the colder parts of Europe are good for sourcing oak. There's nothing special about French forests, it's just that they were the traditional source.
I remember when I first started drinking wine that German oak was common, haven't heard of it lately, must be all cut down?
Cheers - Steve
If you can see through it, it's not worth drinking!
If you can see through it, it's not worth drinking!
707 wrote:Let's not get too excited by European oak from places other than France. For most of the cold war there were far more French barrels made than French oak trees cut to make them
One of the keys to oak I understand is the climate they grow in, colder climates produce slower growing trees which produce tighter grained oak, tight grain being seen as a positive.
Therefore whole swathes of the colder parts of Europe are good for sourcing oak. There's nothing special about French forests, it's just that they were the traditional source.
I remember when I first started drinking wine that German oak was common, haven't heard of it lately, must be all cut down?
As we seem to have diverted to oak, 2 relevant things I have learnt that I think useful:
1) American oak and French (European) oak are 2 different species.
2) Tight grained is not necessarily the best for aging wines. If the winemaker wants the oak input but does not want to have the oxidising effects of barrel aging, "looser" grained oak might be better as it imparts the oak flavour faster. e.g. Chardonnay (oh sorry, no one else drinks that here)
Adair
Wine is bottled poetry.
- Gavin Trott
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:01 pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Contact:
TORB wrote:So do I! I had my annual quota in February when I had a mouthfull of Giaconda and it was so good I didn't spit it!
So your 2005 quota was filled by Giaconda. I know your 2003 quota was filled by the 1973 Leroy La Piéce-sous-le-Bois Meursault. What was your 2004 quota? You seem to like a good Chardonnay then!
Adair
Wine is bottled poetry.
Adair wrote:As we seem to have diverted to oak, 2 relevant things I have learnt that I think useful:
1) American oak and French (European) oak are 2 different species.
2) Tight grained is not necessarily the best for aging wines. If the winemaker wants the oak input but does not want to have the oxidising effects of barrel aging, "looser" grained oak might be better as it imparts the oak flavour faster. e.g. Chardonnay (oh sorry, no one else drinks that here)
Adair
I'll add something else to the mix. When Wayne Dutschke did the launch of his 02 reds in Brisbane, he showed us 3 interesting Barrel samples. One was clearly American Oak, the second was French oak, then he showed us a third barrel. THis was a bit harder, ad the room was split 50/50 as to what the oak was. it turned out to be American Oak, but from Mississippi, not Kentucky. Much colder growing climate, much tighter grained, and a very different effect on the wine.
Diffrent oaks for diffrent folks,
AB
Block 6
I can remembering touring the MacLaren in June 1998, going to the then unheard of in NZ Kay Bros.
Tried the shiraz and cab then was offerred the 95 Block 6. Wow. After 4 days absolute solid tasting and note taking Barossa and McLaren, it went bang to the top of the score sheet. bought enough to need to declare over allowance on the return to New Zealand.
The 95 is an extraordinary vintage which I thought had a bigger and more structured frame than the 98.
I have 2 left, among the most prized aussie reds I have. At $30 they were astonishingly good qpr!!
C
Tried the shiraz and cab then was offerred the 95 Block 6. Wow. After 4 days absolute solid tasting and note taking Barossa and McLaren, it went bang to the top of the score sheet. bought enough to need to declare over allowance on the return to New Zealand.
The 95 is an extraordinary vintage which I thought had a bigger and more structured frame than the 98.
I have 2 left, among the most prized aussie reds I have. At $30 they were astonishingly good qpr!!
C
bigkid wrote:OK guys, be fair - What is Block 6? I take it that it is a Kays' wine. Any more details? I notice that it doesn't appear on the Kays Website. Is it just for subscribers? Is it impossible to get on the list?
Regards,
Allan
Allan, there is a bit about the Block 6 on the Kays web site:
http://www.kaybrothersamerywines.com/block6hist.html
It's their top-level shiraz, hand-crafted from a single block of vines mostly planted in 1891 I think. The Hillside Shiraz is made from vines sourced from Block 6 cuttings.
I think it is still possible to get on the mailing list, Block 6 and Hillside are allocated to 3 bottles each for the 2003 vintage due to low production, it's usually a 6-bottle limit. Or you can buy them from Gavin if he has any left.
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)
-
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 12:17 pm
-
- Posts: 3754
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 7:40 am
- Location: Fragrant Harbour.
I was in a Dan Murphys store in NSW yesterday, and they had 12 bottles of 03 Block 6 sitting in the rack for sale. I had ordered my 3 from the winery, and pondered about buying the lot, but not sure about the wine, and I was far from home. The price was around $56.
Bit sad to see that, when mailing list customers get 3 bottles, and anyone can buy the 12 from Dan Murphys. Do Kays have their priorities a bit wrong here?
Bruce
Bit sad to see that, when mailing list customers get 3 bottles, and anyone can buy the 12 from Dan Murphys. Do Kays have their priorities a bit wrong here?
Bruce