Langtons & Winefront Monthly

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
707
Posts: 1173
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 1:24 pm
Location: Adelaide, centre of the wine universe

Langtons & Winefront Monthly

Post by 707 »

Just had a long read of the Winefront Monthly which arrived overnight.

Campbell provides a full run down of what's in & out & up & down with some, as always, insightful and thougfht provoking comment.

I know I've said this before, but anyone who's on this forum and not subscribing to Winefront Monthly is missing out big time, it's a great read for the price of a good bottle of wine per year.
Cheers - Steve
If you can see through it, it's not worth drinking!

Jersey
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:34 am
Location: New Jersey

Post by Jersey »

Thanks Steve,
Went ahead and just signed up, should get the past 3 months back issues as a bonus. I almost signed up to 'winestate' however recent discussions left me a little uncertain, glad I held off.

Cheers, Look forward to some good reading.
Mick.
"Compromises are for relationships, not wine."

BenK
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 10:04 am

Post by BenK »

I have to agree with Steve. Sensational.

707
Posts: 1173
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 1:24 pm
Location: Adelaide, centre of the wine universe

Post by 707 »

Jersey wrote:Thanks Steve,
Went ahead and just signed up, should get the past 3 months back issues as a bonus. I almost signed up to 'winestate' however recent discussions left me a little uncertain, glad I held off.

Cheers, Look forward to some good reading.
Mick.


Oh Mick, what a lucky escape. Winestate is a sad waste of trees. You'll love WFM, some of Campbell's quotes have me rolling around in laughter. What about this one at the end of a TN "If I didn't drink it, I'd have to shag it"
Last edited by 707 on Wed Jul 27, 2005 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers - Steve
If you can see through it, it's not worth drinking!

User avatar
Maximus
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Central Otago
Contact:

Post by Maximus »

Steve,

You made reference to Langtons in the thread title....?

And whilst I hear everyone talk up Winefront Monthly - and rightly so, it's a great magazine - take the high praise with a grain of salt. Sometimes the writing style (and repetitive nature of the odd article) isn't everyone's cup of tea.

Still, I personally think CM is doing a great job - just what the Aussie wine industry ordered.

2c,
Max
-----
Avant d’être bon, un vin doit être vrai

Jeff2

Post by Jeff2 »

fair point Max. But then, absolutely nothing is everyone's cup of tea. I guess something with only a single topic can't really be anything other than repetitive i.e. this month, we feature wine, the next month, more wine, for something different in January, more wine. I personally find it as enteraining as it can be, but then, I love wine :-)

I just can't believe that the August edition is out in July. That must be a first :D

Now, on Langtons and its list, is it really true that Cullen chardonnay, and Cape Mentelle Chardonnay, have been ditched, yet Petaluma chardonnay is still on???? That has got to be a clanger.

Great to see Rockford at the top, where it belongs.

Jeff. 2

707
Posts: 1173
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 1:24 pm
Location: Adelaide, centre of the wine universe

Post by 707 »

Maximus wrote:Steve,

You made reference to Langtons in the thread title....?



Yes, the August edition of WFM is devoted to the changes and CMs thoughts on them.

Understand your point about writing styles, I love his flair and passion in the TNs but I want more than just TNs and Campbell's lead stories are excellent IMO.
Cheers - Steve
If you can see through it, it's not worth drinking!

Guest

Post by Guest »

Langton's Classification is for the punters, WineFront Monthly is for the drinkers.

TORB
Posts: 2493
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: Bowral NSW
Contact:

Post by TORB »

Anonymous wrote:Langton's Classification is for the punters, WineFront Monthly is for the drinkers.


True, but then drinkers do need to buy and Langton sells so drinkers frequent the race track. :wink:
Cheers
Ric
TORBWine

GraemeG
Posts: 1737
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:53 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by GraemeG »

Didn't the chardys take a hammering! Giaconda up to the firsts, sure, but 4 others downgraded and another 5 gone altogether.

Doesn't seem right that Lovedale is more popular than Vat 1, but there you go...!

cheers,
Graeme

Guest

Post by Guest »

When will AC and RP wine reviews on Langtons site be updated? They are years behind now. Not that I take them too seriously :?

JamieBahrain
Posts: 3754
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 7:40 am
Location: Fragrant Harbour.

Post by JamieBahrain »

Yes superb stuff from Winefront.

Campbell's heads up journalism- the Giaconda the other recent example- is unequalled.

Laurence

Post by Laurence »

I know that this is against the run of things here, but I buy about 70% of the wines I drink out of auction. The other 30% I buy and drink as young wines out of retail. I stopped cellaring wine a few years ago, now I only buy wines that I like at the time, rather than wines that I guess I'll like in ten years. All the wine I buy out of auction is for drinking, I never think of the investment side of it. Yes, some of the wine I buy turns out to be porrly stored. But in general I have very few problems. The wines on the langtons list don't much concern me, or not in themselves, but I do have a keen interest in the overall auction scene, so the toings and froings are decent bedside reading for me.

Laurence.

Post Reply