Dr Peppers and Vegemite
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2003 4:58 pm
Is there a basic difference between the American palate and its Oz counterpart?
I've been thinking about this one for a while,mainly as a result of having the occasional lurk around the Mark Squires board at various times. It's a bit hard to put my thought together coherently,because there was so much stimuli for it,but basically,the Dr Peppers and Vegemite analogy seems to fit the bill for my argument.
Just reading through the posts in reference to Australia,you get to read things like this,
"I don't usually like Australian Shiraz,but.......", followed by a reference to an Australian wine that I have never tasted (Shirvington, Marquis Phillips etc) or even seen ,for that matter.
There seems to be an opinion (amongst the posters there,at least) that Australian red wine is sweet,oaky and alcoholic,one dimensional and somewhat boring.(It seems that cool climate shiraz/cabs are as scarce as hens teeth). But it also seems apparent to me that these styles of wine are what they are being pushed into,given the fact that a lot of these wines are export only labels.(Jeremy Oliver made a post where he said he was refused samples for review of some export only wines because they didn't want him to review their wines!) I know that much of this is driven by the Parker phenomenon and his predilection for "Big" wines,but the fact again that most of these wines are in great demand also establishes that their taste pleases plenty of people.
I'm not going to suggest that there is homogeny across the whole population in regard to taste,but is this push to create a style of wine for an individual market (US) a sign that there is a difference in our sweet/savoury response or is it just a fad that will run its course like all others? Interested in your thoughts.
(AND it bugs me that our all wines are getting tarred with the same brush in relation to lack of individuality!!!)
Cheers
I've been thinking about this one for a while,mainly as a result of having the occasional lurk around the Mark Squires board at various times. It's a bit hard to put my thought together coherently,because there was so much stimuli for it,but basically,the Dr Peppers and Vegemite analogy seems to fit the bill for my argument.
Just reading through the posts in reference to Australia,you get to read things like this,
"I don't usually like Australian Shiraz,but.......", followed by a reference to an Australian wine that I have never tasted (Shirvington, Marquis Phillips etc) or even seen ,for that matter.
There seems to be an opinion (amongst the posters there,at least) that Australian red wine is sweet,oaky and alcoholic,one dimensional and somewhat boring.(It seems that cool climate shiraz/cabs are as scarce as hens teeth). But it also seems apparent to me that these styles of wine are what they are being pushed into,given the fact that a lot of these wines are export only labels.(Jeremy Oliver made a post where he said he was refused samples for review of some export only wines because they didn't want him to review their wines!) I know that much of this is driven by the Parker phenomenon and his predilection for "Big" wines,but the fact again that most of these wines are in great demand also establishes that their taste pleases plenty of people.
I'm not going to suggest that there is homogeny across the whole population in regard to taste,but is this push to create a style of wine for an individual market (US) a sign that there is a difference in our sweet/savoury response or is it just a fad that will run its course like all others? Interested in your thoughts.
(AND it bugs me that our all wines are getting tarred with the same brush in relation to lack of individuality!!!)
Cheers