Haselgrove H Shiraz: Rubbish for $67
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 1:56 pm
I was recently given a bottle of 2002 Haselgrove H Shiraz.
What a disappointment.
The oak was out of control, far overwhelming the fruit. Not good oak mind you - overly charry, almost acrid oak like that peaty smoky taste in a strong scotch.
I think the winemaker was trying to cover up the poor quality fruit which was overripe and jammy - but not concentrated and rather dilute.
After drinking this wine I looked it up in Halliday and apparently it costs 67 bucks. Are you kidding? I have had better $15 wines.
We drank this along side a 1999 St Henri - which was outstanding in comparison (and cheaper) and made the Haselgrove look very poor indeed.
I also noticed a plastic taste - perhaps Brett, which could explain the poor performance.
Has anyone else out there had this wine and thought the same thing?
What a disappointment.
The oak was out of control, far overwhelming the fruit. Not good oak mind you - overly charry, almost acrid oak like that peaty smoky taste in a strong scotch.
I think the winemaker was trying to cover up the poor quality fruit which was overripe and jammy - but not concentrated and rather dilute.
After drinking this wine I looked it up in Halliday and apparently it costs 67 bucks. Are you kidding? I have had better $15 wines.
We drank this along side a 1999 St Henri - which was outstanding in comparison (and cheaper) and made the Haselgrove look very poor indeed.
I also noticed a plastic taste - perhaps Brett, which could explain the poor performance.
Has anyone else out there had this wine and thought the same thing?