sjw_11 wrote:Luke W wrote:2010 Penfolds St Henri - Andrew Caillard you've got to be kidding me. Sorry I found this very average and kinda derivative of a middle of the road Penfolds red. If it was a Bin 389 from a better year I'd be sending it back and thinking that it was corked. It was nice but boring and one dimensional.
It was aerated and decanted for a couple of hours and then drunk slowly for 2 more hours. It didn't improve substantially. Have I been conned? Glad I only bought 3.
Interesting feedback Luke... this might put the cat among the pigeons given how many on here (including me!) bought some of this... Mine are 12,000 miles away in my cellar - anyone else tried one of these lately who agrees or disagrees?
I have seen it about half a dozen times now, last on Friday night with, to be fair, spaghetti marinara. Standard St Henri. FWIW, I thought a 91-92 point wine.
I get bored of repeating myself, but the ACCC should take a look into this whole con. I would be willing to bet a million or two the hype of this wine has pushed Penfolds wine sales across the board significantly up.
Perhaps the most amusing encounter was at the great wines of the world, in HK, where a prominent HK collector (and anyone who knows HK wine collectors knows they just
love to speak their minds), dragged a very famous American wine critic over hot coals discussing this wine. In the end, the critic acknowledged it's inferiority side-by-side with several left bank from 2010, and agreed his 98 points might have been "a little generous". hmmm, sometimes I wonder if they are critics or lemmings, afraid of being outside the norm.
As for Andrew Caillard, well, enough said. I mean to be fair, there are bad footballers, and bad doctors too.